No abstract

No abstract

Intermittent dosing of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole on 2 consecutive days per week is an effective alternative prophylactic regimen for P. carinii pneumonia in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma. This analysis does not support a difference in neutropenia during maintenance therapy between patients who are treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus an alternative drug.

Background Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comes with a significant risk of life‐threatening infection during periods of prolonged severe neutropenia. We studied the impact of preventive intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration at onset of absolute neutropenia on the incidence and outcome of life‐threatening infections during treatment of childhood AML. Procedures This is a retrospective study on pediatric patients (aged 0–18 years) consecutively diagnosed with de novo AML and treated at a single institution from April 2005 through February 2013. Patients were treated on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) AAML0531 protocol or with a modified United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UK MRC) AML 10 regimen. Pertinent data were extracted from hard copy or electronic chart review. Results A total of 76 chemotherapy phases were analyzed from 29 patients. In each phase reported, preventive antibiotics were initiated when the daily absolute neutrophil count was <500 cells/mcl, before onset of fever. Seven episodes of bacteremia were documented with predominantly coagulase‐negative staphylococci and viridans group streptococci. One infection‐related death occurred, attributed to progressive respiratory failure occurring months after documented candidal pneumonia. Conclusions Initiation of preventive antibiotics at the onset of absolute neutropenia was associated with no mortality from bacteremia. This preventive approach appears feasible and safe. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1149–1154. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Teenage survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have increased morbidity likely due to their prior multicomponent treatment. Habits established in adolescence can impact individuals’ subsequent adult behaviors. Accordingly, healthy lifestyles, avoiding harmful actions, and appropriate disease surveillance are of heightened importance among teenage survivors. We review the findings from prevention science and their relevance to heath promotion. The capabilities and current uses of eHealth components including e-learning, serious video games, exergaming, behavior tracking, individual messaging, and social networking are briefly presented. The health promotion needs of adolescent survivors are aligned with those eHealth aspects to propose a new paradigm to enhance the wellbeing of adolescent ALL survivors.

Background We sought to determine whether survivors of standard risk ALL (SR-ALL) treated without cranial radiation have increased risk for obesity by assessing changes in body mass index (BMI) during and after treatment; identifying contributing patient and treatment factors; comparing rates of overweight/obese to national health data. Procedure Eligibility for this retrospective cohort study included 1) previous enrollment on legacy therapy trials CCG1922 or CCG1952; 2) continuous first remission; and 3) age at follow-up evaluation of 6-16.99 years. Height and weight from diagnosis, consolidation, start of maintenance, last cycle of maintenance, and off-therapy were analyzed. Results The 269 subjects were a median age of 3.5 years at diagnosis and 13.3 years at follow-up. BMI% significantly increased from induction to consolidation (+17.6 ± 1.6%), start of maintenance to end-of-treatment (+3.3 ± 1.6%) and decreased from end-of-treatment to follow-up (−3.5 ± 1.6%,). Higher BMI% at follow-up was associated with higher BMI% at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), but not age at diagnosis, gender, or race. Patients previously randomized to dexamethasone had a stronger association between BMI% at diagnosis and BMI% at follow-up than those who received prednisone (p=0.0005). At follow-up, 39% of survivors were overweight or obese; the relative risk of overweight/obese was 1.028 (p=0.738) compared to the general population. Conclusions Our study of patients with SR-ALL found a significant increase in BMI% largely during the first month of therapy that is greater with dexamethasone than prednisone. However, after therapy, there was no increased risk of overweight/obese BMI compared to non-cancer peers.

Background Within pediatric oncology, parental decision making regarding participation in clinical trials that aim to reduce therapy to mitigate side effects is not well studied. The recently completed Children's Oncology Group trial for standard‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AALL0932) included a reduction in maintenance therapy, and required consent for randomization immediately prior to starting maintenance. At our institution, 40% of children enrolled on AALL0932 were withdrawn from protocol therapy prior to randomization due to parental choice. This study sought to identify factors that impacted parental decision making regarding randomization on AALL0932. Procedure Parents of children enrolled on AALL0932 at our institution were eligible if their child met criteria for the average‐risk randomization. Parents were invited to participate in a 30‐50‐minute phone interview. Questions focused on factors that shaped parental decision making about randomization, as well as their perspectives about the clinical trial experience more generally. Results Fear of receiving less therapy and subsequent relapse was the predominant reason to decline randomization. Reasons given for consenting to randomization included trust in the physician, altruism, hope for less therapy, and potential for fewer side effects. Parents also reflected on ways to support future families making decisions about clinical trial participation. Conclusion While many parents recognize the importance of clinical trials aiming to mitigate side effects, the fear of their own child relapsing with less than standard therapy may dissuade them from study participation. Recognizing and addressing these concerns will be important for enrollment and retention in future clinical trials.

No abstract