International guidelines for cytotoxicity limits for the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay require reductions in cell growth of greater than 50%. This sets no upper limit on toxicity and there is concern about the number of false or irrelevant results obtained in the aberration assay, i.e., positive results at toxic dose levels only, with no evidence for primary DNA damaging ability and with negative results in the other genotoxicity tests. We have previously proposed that no truly genotoxic compound would be missed if the toxicity of the highest dose did not exceed 50%. Cell growth measured by cell counts as a percentage of controls can underestimate toxicity. For example, if we seed half a million cells per culture, and the controls double to 1 million during the experiment, a culture that truly has no growth will still have a cell count 50% of the control. Measurement of population doublings (PDs) more accurately assesses cell growth. To assess the use of PD in dose selection, we examined previous data from this lab and data from new experiments with "true," primary DNA damaging clastogens, and with clastogens, including drugs, thought to act indirectly, through cytotoxicity-associated mechanisms. We compared aberration results where the highest doses scored were based on 50% reductions in final cell counts with results obtained when the highest doses were based on PD. The PD method allows detection of true clastogens, including those that are active in a range with some toxicity, and reduces the number of toxicity-related "false"-positive results.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Chromosome aberrations can occur by secondary mechanism(s) associated with cytotoxicity, induced by chemicals that do not attack DNA. Aberrations are formed from DNA double-strand breaks, and DSBs are known to be induced by nonmutagenic (Ames test negative) noncarcinogens at toxic levels [Storer et al. (1996): Mutat Res 368:59-101]. Here, 8 of 12 of these chemicals caused aberrations in CHO cells at cytotoxic doses, and often only when cell counts (survival) at 20 hr approached < or =50% of controls. Five of eight noncarcinogens (2,4,-dichlorophenol, dithiocarb, menthol, phthalic anhydride, and ethionamide) and one of two equivocal carcinogens (bisphenol A) caused aberrations, usually over a narrow dose range with steeply increasing cytotoxicity. Phthalic anhydride and ethionamide were positive only at doses with precipitate. Phenformin was negative even at toxic doses and ephedrine and phenylephrine were negative and gave little toxicity. Aberrations were also induced by metabolic poisons, 2,4-dinitrophenol, (uncouples oxidative phosphorylation), and sodium iodoacetate, (Nal; blocks ATP production). Five of the chemicals that induced aberrations in CHO cells were tested in human TK6 cells and four were positive, the fifth being equivocal. Stable aberrations (translocations) were induced in human cells by Nal. Clearly, chemicals can give "false-positive" results in the chromosome aberration assay at cytotoxic levels, though cytotoxicity does not always produce aberrations, so that further information (e.g., DNA reactivity) is needed to determine whether a result is a "false-positive." Primary DNA-damaging chemicals such as alkylators are also cytotoxic, but give strong increases in aberrations without marked initial toxicity by the measures used here, although the aberrations they induce do reduce long-term survival in colony-forming assays.

No abstract

No abstract