1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7992(95)90040-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A role for mismatch repair in production of chromosome aberrations by methylating agents in human cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently shown that the O 6 -meG DNA adduct is the predominant carcinogenic lesion in MMR competent mice, and based on our data here, suggest that this is also the case for MMR de®cient mice (Allay et al, 1999). Of interest, MMR-defective cells have been shown to have reduced numbers of chromosomal aberrations following methylating agent exposure, indicating that MMR processing of O 6 -meG may be critical to these aberrations (Galloway et al, 1995). From this, we predict that most of the carcinogenic lesions in PMS2 7/7 mice are point mutations rather than chromosomal in nature.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have recently shown that the O 6 -meG DNA adduct is the predominant carcinogenic lesion in MMR competent mice, and based on our data here, suggest that this is also the case for MMR de®cient mice (Allay et al, 1999). Of interest, MMR-defective cells have been shown to have reduced numbers of chromosomal aberrations following methylating agent exposure, indicating that MMR processing of O 6 -meG may be critical to these aberrations (Galloway et al, 1995). From this, we predict that most of the carcinogenic lesions in PMS2 7/7 mice are point mutations rather than chromosomal in nature.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…This futile cycle is associated with DNA double strand breaks whenever the single strand extends to the replication site, either leading to S phase arrest and, ultimately, induction of apoptosis (Meikrantz et al, 1998) and cell death. Surviving cells are loaden with G to A mutations or can undergo nonhomologous recombination and chromosomal rearrangements at the site of the patches (Galloway et al, 1995), contributing to the carcinogenesis of methylating agents in MMR competent animals. In contrast, MMR de®cient cells, due to the lack of initiation of MMR, are tolerance to methylating agents (Fink et al, 1998;Liu et al, 1996) and a large number of O 6 -meG DNA adducts, which we have previously reported to be 96 pg/mg guanine bases 3 h after MNU treatment and over 70 pg/mg guanine bases by 18 h (Liu et al, 1994), are converted to G to A mutations and results in a marked increase in tumorigenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That events of this type indeed arise in cells treated with methylating agents was suggested by an increase in SCE frequency in the treated MMR-proficient 293T L␣ + cells (data not shown; N. Mojas, L.Stojic, and J. Jiricny, in prep. ; see also Galloway et al 1995;Kaina et al 1997). The timing of these events broadly coincided with the formation of foci containing RPA, ATR (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current model, supported by a broad range of evidence, suggests that O 6 MeG pairs with thymine, forming a mismatch that is subject to mismatch repair (MMR) (Karran and Stephenson, 1990;Kat et al, 1993;Duckett et al, 1996). Owing to repetitive, faulty MMR cycles provoked by the mispairing properties of O 6 MeG, secondary DNA lesions are formed, which either directly or upon interference with DNA replication trigger chromosomal damage and cell death, which is executed mainly by apoptosis (Galloway et al, 1995;Kaina et al, 1997;Hickman and Samson, 1999). Cells defective in MMR are highly resistant to O 6 MeG-generating agents such as the model alkylating drug N-methyl-N 0 -nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and similar acting anticancer drugs (Kat et al, 1993;Dosch et al, 1998;Marra et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%