Background The study was conducted to examine the impact of oral contraceptives (OCs) on serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels by obesity status in reproductive-age women. Study design Ovulatory women, ages 18–35 years, of normal (< 25 kg/m2; n = 10) and obese (> 30 kg/m2; n = 10) body mass index (BMI) received a low-dose OC (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol/100 mcg levonorgestrel) for two cycles. Serum samples obtained at several time points during active pill use and hormone-free intervals were analyzed for AMH, FSH, LH, estradiol and inhibin B. Results AMH levels did not differ by OC cycle day in either BMI group. On average, AMH levels were 34% lower in the obese group (2.9±2.1 versus 4.4±1.8ng/ml, p<0.05). Modeling to determine differences in AMH throughout the cycle based on obesity status demonstrated significiantly lower levels (p<0.05), whereras serum AMH, FSH, LH, estradiol and inhibin B levels revealed no correlations when all time points were included. Conclusions In reproductive-aged women, serum AMH levels do not appear to fluctuate during OC use but AMH levels are significantly lower in obese women. Lower levels do not appear to be due to differences in gonadotropin levels or ovarian activity.

Oral Diseases (2012) 18, 625–632 Non‐exposed bisphosphonate‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a newly reported complication arising from bisphosphonate therapy that presents with atypical symptoms and no apparent mucosal fenestration or exposure of necrotic bone. The clinical observation of the presence of necrotic bone underneath normal epithelial coverage was not conclusive for the diagnosis of BRONJ based on current guidelines established by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR), which specify the presence of clinically exposed necrotic bone for more than 8 weeks. Hence, the purpose of this review is to critically assess the current guidelines for diagnosis and management of BRONJ and propose a modified staging system and treatment guidelines to properly address the non‐exposed variant of BRONJ lesions.

No abstract

Optimal care for breast cancer patients undergoing aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is ensured when estradiol (E2) levels are adequately suppressed. To assess treatment efficacy accurately, it is important to measure the serum E2 levels using a well validated assay method with high sensitivity and specificity. This translates into the urgent need to evaluate various E2 immunoassay kits, which are frequently used in hospital settings to measure E2 serum levels in patients undergoing AI treatment, so clinicians obtain accurate and reliable measurements allowing appropriate clinical decision making. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of different commercially available and commonly used E2 immunoassay kits regarding measurement of E2 levels in the serum of postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with AIs, in comparison to a highly accurate and reliable mass spectrometry assay. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from 77 postmenopausal breast cancer patients who were treated with an AI. Serum E2 levels were measured by 6 immunoassay methods and by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which served as the standard for comparison. Analysis of E2 by LC-MS/MS showed that 70% of the samples had levels that were <5 pg/ml. Three of the assays carried out with commercial E2 immunoassay kits had poor sensitivities and were not able to detect E2 levels <10 or <20 pg/ml. Although two of the E2 assays using commercial kits demonstrated a better sensitivity (5 pg/ml), the measured E2 values were substantially higher than those obtained by LC-MS/MS. The assay with the sixth commercial E2 kit grossly underestimated the true E2 values. E2 assays carried out with commercial E2 immunoassay kits lack the accuracy to measure the very low serum E2 levels found in patients being treated with AIs. Serum samples from such patients should be sent to laboratories that use a mass spectrometry assay.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplant for symptomatic focal cartilage defects in the knee has demonstrated favorable short- to midterm outcomes. However, the reoperation rate is high, and literature on mid- to long-term outcomes is limited. Purpose: To analyze clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), failures, and graft survival rates after OCA transplant of the femoral condyles at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Review of a prospectively maintained database of 205 consecutive patients who had primary OCA transplant was performed to identify patients with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Outcomes including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), CSOs, complications, reoperation rate, and failures were evaluated. Failure was defined as revision cartilage procedure, conversion to knee arthroplasty, or macroscopic graft failure confirmed using second-look arthroscopy. Patient preoperative and surgical factors were assessed for their association with outcomes. Results: A total of 160 patients (78.0% follow-up) underwent OCA transplant with a mean follow-up of 7.7 ± 2.7 years (range, 5.0-16.3 years). Mean age at the time of surgery was 31.9 ± 10.7 years, with a mean symptom duration of 5.8 ± 6.3 years. All mean PRO scores significantly improved, with 75.0% of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and 58.9% of patients achieving significant clinical benefit for the International Knee Documentation Committee score at final follow-up. The reoperation rate was 39.4% and was associated with a lower probability of achieving MCID. However, most patients undergoing reoperation did not proceed to failure at final follow-up (63.4% of total reoperations). A total of 34 (21.3%) patients had failures overall, and the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 86.2% and 81.8%, respectively. Failure was independently associated with greater body mass index, longer symptom duration, number of previous procedures, and previous failed cartilage debridement. Athletes were protected against failure. Survival rates over time were not affected by OCA site ( P = .154), previous cartilage or meniscal procedure ( P = .287 and P = .284, respectively), or concomitant procedures at the time of OCA transplant ( P = .140). Conclusion: OCA transplant was associated with significant clinical improvement and durability at mid- to long-term follow-up, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 86.2% and 81.8%, respectively. Maintenance of CSOs can be expected in the majority of patients at a mean of 7.7 years after OCA transplant. Although the reoperation rate was high (39.4%) and could have adversely affected chances of maintaining MCID, most patients did not have failure at long-term follow-up.

No abstract

No abstract

Long-term daily preventive treatment should be considered for patients with MRM and those with severe PMM. Miniprophylaxis can be used in PMM rather than daily preventive treatment. When considering the use of short-term miniprophylaxis, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, and frovatriptan have shown efficacy; however, frovatriptan appears to be the triptan of choice based on overall efficacy. Oral contraceptives may be considered if patients do not respond to or cannot tolerate typical migraine preventive medications. In patients with migraine with aura, oral contraceptives should be used with caution as this may add to the risk of stroke in this population.