Background
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as a bridge (BTT) to heart transplantation (HTX) may be limited by the formation of anti-HLA antibodies. Whether sensitization occurs with continuous axial flow LVAD implant as assessed by Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay is unknown.
Methods
Cytotoxic panel reactive antibody (PRA) and SAB assays were analyzed in HTX recipients undergoing LVAD implant as a BTT. Sensitization was defined as peak anti-HLA antibody values of >2000 mean fluorescent intensity as these values have been found to correlate with flow cytometric crossmatch results.
Results
LVADs were implanted as BTT in 30 patients. There were 7% (2/30) of patients prior to and no patients after LVAD implant with PRA >10%. However, 20% (6/30) of patients prior to and 53% (16/30) after LVAD were sensitized as measured by SAB (p=0.024). At HTX, 47% (14/30) of patients remained sensitized. A positive virtual crossmatch was observed in 28% (4/14) of the sensitized patients at HTX. There was no difference between the sensitized and non-sensitized groups (p>0.4 for all) in usage of blood products (64 11 vs. 63 39 units), time to HTX (286 63 vs. 257 48 days) and 1 year after HTX, there were no differences in rejection (total rejection score 0.30 vs. 0.37) and survival (93% vs. 88%).
Conclusion
Allosensitization after LVAD is common despite cytotoxic PRA being negative. One year after HTX, this sensitization does not translate into increased acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection or reduced survival.
Rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor affects senescence through suppression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). We studied the safety and feasibility of low-dose rapamycin and its effect on SASP and frailty in elderly undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). 13 patients; 6 (0.5mg), 6 (1.0mg), and 1 patient received 2mg oral rapamycin (serum rapamycin <6ng/ml) daily for 12 weeks. Median age was 73.9±7.5 years and 12 were men. Serum interleukin-6 decreased (2.6 vs 4.4 pg/ml) and MMP-3 (26 vs 23.5 ng/ml) increased. Adipose tissue expression of mRNAs (arbitrary units) for MCP-1 (3585 vs 2020, p=0.06), PPAR-γ (1257 vs 1166), PAI-1 (823 vs 338, p=0.08) increased, whereas interleukin-8 (163 vs 312), TNF-α (75 vs 94) and p16 (129 vs 169) decreased. Cellular senescence-associated beta galactosidase activity (2.2% vs 3.6%, p=0.18) tended to decrease. We observed some correlation between some senescence markers and physical performance but no improvement in frailty with rapamycin was noted. (NCT01649960).
BackgroundQuadrangular space syndrome involves compression of the axillary nerve and posterior circumflex humeral artery. In a few cases, its management requires surgical decompression. The current study reviews the surgical approaches used in the decompression of neurovascular structures and presents our reflections and recommendations.
MethodologyIn this study, four human cadavers were used for dissection of the axillae and the scapular region by the senior residents of the Department of Anatomy and Department of Orthopedics. The residents dissected the quadrangular space in the eight upper limbs using anterior and posterior surgical approaches.
ResultsTo identify the quadrangular space and secure its contents, the posterior approach was recognized as the easier and quicker method by both Anatomy and Orthopedic residents; however, it may result in increased postoperative morbidity. Although the anterior (deltopectoral) approach involves more skill, it reduces postoperative morbidity.
ConclusionsThe anterior (deltopectoral) approach with suggested modifications can be an effective method in the surgical decompression of quadrangular space syndrome. The authors suggest more cadaveric studies to provide anatomists and surgeons with the opportunity to practice and evaluate older and newer surgical approaches.
Background: The axillary nerve and posterior circumflex humeral artery are compressed in Quadrangular Space Syndrome (QSS), which can be treated with conservative approaches or surgical decompression in recalcitrant instances. There are no clear guidelines for determining which surgical method is optimal for treating QSS and other disorders that mirror QSS. Objective: The goal of this study is to grade and review past, current, and planned medicinal and surgical care modalities for QSS. Materials and Methods: The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022332766). To identify recent advances in the methods/techniques of medical and surgical management of QSS, PubMed and Medline databases were searched until March 2022 for publications, including case studies, case reports, and review articles, using medical subject headings terms like quadrilateral space syndrome, surgical management, and medical management. Throughout the study, all the authors scrupulously followed a well-developed registered review process and the risk of bias in systematic reviews guidance tool. Data on proposed medical and surgical management methods/techniques were compiled, and each was analyzed based on the underlying neuro-vascular systems. Results: There were 88 items found in the first search. Following applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 papers were chosen for synthesis in the review study after a thorough assessment. Three studies (conservative and advanced) focused on medical care of QSS, while 12 articles (prior, current, and newer) focused on surgical management of QSS. Only four of the 15 studies reviewed proposed different surgical approaches/techniques for surgical decompression in QSS. Conclusions: There were two regularly used surgical procedures discovered, one anterior/delto-pectoral and the other posterior/ scapular. The anterior route is more technically straightforward and can be employed for surgical QSS decompression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.