Introduction
Allosensitization has been shown to negatively impact post-heart transplant (HTx) survival even with a negative crossmatch. Whether MCS-related allosensitization is associated with worse post-HTx survival remains controversial.
Materials and Methods
Adult HTx recipients listed in the United Network for Organ Sharing database (7/06–12/12) were identified. Multivariate Cox regression assessed the effect of allosensitization on survival. Propensity matching was performed to compare allosensitized and non-sensitized patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared matched and unmatched patients in both the MCS and medically managed cohorts.
Results
We identified 11,840 HTx recipients, of whom 4,167 had MCS. MCS was associated with allosensitization in multivariate logistic regression. Each different MCS devices was associated with worse post-HTx survival in multivariate Cox regression. Allosensitization did not predict post-HTx mortality in MCS patients, HR: 1.07 (0.89–1.28), P=0.48. Among patients without MCS, allosensitization was associated with post-HTx mortality, HR: 1.19 (1.03–1.39), P=0.02. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed equivalent survival in unmatched and matched cohorts when comparing MCS patients who were allosensitized and non-sensitized MCS patients. Among non-MCS patients, allosensitization was associated with worse survival in both unmatched and matched analysis.
Conclusions
MCS was associated with allosensitization. For MCS patients, allosensitization did not independently predict worse post-HTx outcome. Among non-MCS patients, allosensitization was associated with worse post-HTx survival. Allosensitization appears to be a heterogeneous process influenced by presence of MCS.