New trends in study design based on drug profiles include the use of adjuvant therapies and the inclusion of patients with comorbidities. The recent expansion of inclusion/exclusion criteria in pediatric clinical trials of ADHD allows for a more rigorous analysis of associated benefits and risks with the use of adjuvant therapy.
The aim of the study was to examine functional brain activity in response
to unpleasant images in individuals with the 7-repeat (7R) allele compared to
individuals with the 4-repeat (4R) allele of the dopamine receptor D4
(DRD4) gene (VNTR in exon 3). Based on the response ready
hypothesis, individuals with the DRD4-4R/7R genotype were
expected to show greater functional brain activity in response to unpleasant
compared to neutral stimuli in specific regions of the frontal, temporal,
parietal and limbic lobes, which form the networks involved in attentional,
emotional, and preparatory responses. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
activity was studied in 26 young adults (13 with the DRD4-4R/7R
genotype and 13 with the DRD4-4R/4R genotype). Participants
were asked to look at and subjectively rate unpleasant and neutral images.
Results showed increased brain activity in response to unpleasant images
compared to neutral images in the right temporal lobe in participants with the
DRD4-4R/7R genotype versus participants with the
DRD4-4R/4R genotype. The increase in right temporal lobe
activity in individuals with DRD4-4R/7R suggests greater
involvement in processing negative emotional stimuli. Intriguingly, no
differences were found between the two genotypes in the subjective ratings of
the images. The findings corroborate the response ready hypothesis, which
suggests that individuals with the 7R allele are more responsive to negative
emotional stimuli compared to individuals with the 4R allele of the
DRD4 gene.
Although clinical studies of eltoprazine did not conclusively demonstrate its efficacy in treating pathological aggression in humans, eltoprazine has shown to be a well-tolerated drug in both healthy volunteers and patients across several indications studied thus far. More recently, the role of eltoprazine in reducing symptoms of ADHD in adults has been explored in a clinical trial. Future research may provide endophenotypical characteristics to help identify specific subgroups of patients with ADHD, who can benefit from the development of eltoprazine, to maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse reactions.
Background
The vast majority of COVID-19 disease occurs in outpatients where treatment is limited to anti-virals for high-risk subgroups. Acebilustat, a leukotriene B4 (LTB4) inhibitor, has potential to reduce inflammation and symptom duration.
Methods
In a single-center trial spanning Delta and Omicron variants, outpatients were randomized to 100 mg of oral acebilustat or placebo for 28 days. Patients reported daily symptoms via electronic query through Day 28 with phone follow-up on Day 120 and collected nasal swabs on Days 1-10. The primary outcome was sustained symptom resolution to Day 28. Secondary 28-day outcomes included time to first symptom resolution, area under the curve (AUC) of longitudinal daily symptom scores; duration of viral shedding through Day 10; and symptoms on Day 120.
Results
Sixty participants were randomized to each study arm. At enrollment, median duration and number of symptoms were 4 (IQR 3-5) days and 9 (IQR 7-11) symptoms. Most patients (90%) were vaccinated with 73% having neutralizing antibodies. A minority (44%) of participants (35% in the acebilustat arm and 53% in placebo) had sustained symptom resolution at Day 28 (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.34-1.04, p = 0.07 favoring placebo). There was no difference in mean AUC of symptom scores over 28 days (difference in mean of AUC 9.4, 95% CI -42.1-60.9, p=0.72). Acebilustat did not impact viral shedding or symptoms at Day 120.
Conclusions
Sustained symptoms through Day 28 were common in this low-risk population. Despite this, LTB4 antagonism with acebilustat did not shorten symptom duration in outpatients with COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.