Background
This study evaluated the impact of sarcopenia and psoas major muscle volume on the survival of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy.
Methods
We reviewed data from 110 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy in our department between June 2007 and February 2017. Psoas major muscle volume was quantified based on computed tomography data using Synapse Vincent software. The psoas major muscle volume index was calculated as psoas major muscle volume/height squared (cm3/m2). We analysed relapse-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival after radical nephroureterectomy to identify factors that predicted patient survival.
Results
The median psoas major muscle volume index was 121.5 cm3/m2, and the psoas major muscle volume index was <100 cm3/m2 in 34 of 110 patients (30.9%). Multivariate analysis indicated that ≥pT3-stage cancer, lymphovascular invasion and a psoas major muscle volume index of <100 cm3/m2 were independent predictors of shorter relapse-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Using these factors, patients were stratified into three groups: low, intermediate and high risks for relapse-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival.
Conclusions
Low psoas major muscle volume resulting from sarcopenia, high T stage and the presence of lymphovascular invasion was associated with poor survival in patients with urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy, supporting the use of psoas major muscle volume as a new objective prognostic marker.
This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the LDN-PSA (LacdiNAc-glycosylated-prostate specific antigen) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients suspected of having clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate specific antigen levels ranging between 3.0 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL and suspicious lesions with PI-RADS (Prostate ImagingeReporting and Data System) category !3 were included prospectively. The LDN-PSA was measured using an automated 2-step Wisteria floribunda agglutinin lectineantieprostate specific antigen antibody sandwich immunoassay. Results: Two hundred four patients were included. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 105 patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, prostate specific antigen density (OR 1.61, P [ .010), LDN-PSAD (OR 1.04, P [ .012), highest PI-RADS category (3 vs 4, 5; OR 14.5, P < .0001), and location of the lesion with highest PI-RADS category (transition zone vs peripheral zone) (OR 0.34, P [ .009) were significant risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. Among the patients with the highest PI-RADS category 3 (n[113), clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 28 patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with the highest PI-RADS category 3, age (OR 1.10, P [ .026) and LDN-PSAD (OR 1.07, P < .0001) were risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: LDN-PSAD would be a biomarker for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with prostate specific antigen levels 20 ng/mL and suspicious lesions with PI-RADS category !3. The use of LDN-PSAD as an adjunct to the use of prostate specific antigen levels would avoid unnecessary biopsies in patients with the highest PI-RADS category 3. Multi-institutional studies with large population are recommended.
Objectives: There is no recommended observation time for patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. This study was undertaken to determine the postoperative observation time by investigating the hazard rate for prostate-specific antigen failure and other-cause death using Weibull analysis. Methods: We included 612 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between June 2002 and December 2017. Risk classification was categorized by the D'Amico risk classification, and the patients were divided into three age groups: <60, 60-69 and ≥70 years. The hazard rates at each point were derived using Weibull analysis. The optimal observation time after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was determined as the intersection point at which the hazard rate of other-cause death overtakes the hazard rate of prostate-specific antigen failure.Results: In all groups classified by age, the hazard rate of other-cause deaths increased over time. In contrast, the hazard rate of prostate-specific antigen failure decreased gradually. The ≥70 years age group showed the highest hazard rate. The hazard rate of prostate-specific antigen failure was highest in the high-risk group. The patients aged ≥70 and 60-69 years in the low-risk group were recommended 6 years 6 months and 14 years 8 months, respectively, for observation. The remaining patients were recommended >25 years of postsurgical observation. Conclusions: The observation time after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy could be estimated by comparing the estimated hazard rates of prostate-specific antigen failure and other-cause death based on Weibull analysis. Urologists should pay attention to age and risk classifications for optimal postoperative observation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.