Not only Islamic financial institutions rate impressively, but also Islamic banking. Statistics released by Bank Indonesia prove the premise. At the same time, supporting the legality of Islamic banking operations became more solid. Although at the beginning of its establishment faced legal problems, but since the enactment the Islamic Banking No. 21 of 2008 has been issued, the problem is resolved. Authority that important in the dynamics of Islamic banking regulation is the National Sharia BoardCouncil of Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). The council became the source of authoritative institutions in guarding the observance of the Islamic banking industry to comply with the rules of sharia. All Islamic banking products must be controlled under sharia compliance by the DSN-MUI. Then, the fatwa is absorbed by Bank Indonesia and Bank Indonesia Regulation (Peraturan Bank Indonesia) is set to be. In this context, the national banking regulator has a significant association with DSN-MUI fatwa.Tidak hanya lembaga keuangan syariah saja yang melaju dengan impresif, perbankan syariah pun melaju dengan impresif pula. Angka statistik yang dirilis Bank Indonesia membuktikan premis tersebut. Pada waktu yang bersamaan, legalitas yang menopang operasional perbankan syariah pun semakin kokoh. Walaupun diawal pendiriannya menghadapi masalah legalitas, namun sejak ditetapkannya UU no 21 tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah maka masalah legalitas relatif sudah teratasi. Otoritas yang penting dalam dinamika regulasi perbankan syariah adalah Dewan Syariah Nasional-Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). Lembaga ini menjadi sumber otoritatif dalam mengawal ketaatan pelaku industri perbankan syariah untuk mematuhi aturan syara. Semua produk perbankan syariah harus difatwakan sesuai syariah oleh DSN-MUI. Fatwa ini kemudian diserap oleh Bank Indonesia dan ditetapkan menjadi Peraturan Bank Indonesia. Dalam konteks ini maka regulasi perbankan nasional memiliki keterkaitan yang signifikan dengan fatwa DSN-MUI.
The background of the article is the contents of Article 59 paragraph (3) and explanation of paragraph (1) of the Law on Judicial Power. The article authorizes the District Court to implement the decision of the Sharia arbitration body on the resolution of Islamic economic disputes. The article and explanation of the verse contradicts the absolute authority of the Religious Courts regulated in Article 49 letter (i) of the Law on Religious Courts. This shows that, the legislators are not consistent in making laws and regulations, so that it creates legal uncertainty. By applying the normative legal research method to the statute approach and case approach, this article seeks to describe the phenomenon of legal conflicts that occur. From the in-depth analysis it can be concluded that the legal provisions regarding the implementation of the decision of the National Sharia Arbitration Board are regulated in the Arbitration Law, the Judicial Power Act and the Religious Courts Act. The legal substance of the provisions therein enables antinomy or legal conflicts. Antinomy settlement can use the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.