Positive-strand RNA viruses use diverse mechanisms to regulate viral and host gene expression for ensuring their efficient proliferation or persistence in the host. We found that a small viral noncoding RNA (0.4 kb), named SR1f, accumulated in Red clover necrotic mosaic virus (RCNMV)-infected plants and protoplasts and was packaged into virions. The genome of RCNMV consists of two positive-strand RNAs, RNA1 and RNA2. SR1f was generated from the 3 untranslated region (UTR) of RNA1, which contains RNA elements essential for both cap-independent translation and negative-strand RNA synthesis. A 58-nucleotide sequence in the 3 UTR of RNA1 (Seq1f58) was necessary and sufficient for the generation of SR1f. SR1f was neither a subgenomic RNA nor a defective RNA replicon but a stable degradation product generated by Seq1f58-mediated protection against 533 decay. SR1f efficiently suppressed both cap-independent and cap-dependent translation both in vitro and in vivo. SR1f trans inhibited negative-strand RNA synthesis of RCNMV genomic RNAs via repression of replicase protein production but not via competition of replicase proteins in vitro. RCNMV seems to use cellular enzymes to generate SR1f that might play a regulatory role in RCNMV infection. Our results also suggest that Seq1f58 is an RNA element that protects the 3-side RNA sequences against 533 decay in plant cells as reported for the poly(G) tract and stable stem-loop structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Many lines of recent evidence indicate that noncodingRNAs including microRNAs and small interfering RNAs play an important role in the control of gene expression in diverse cellular processes and in defense responses against molecular parasites such as viruses and transposons. Viruses also use many different types of RNAs in trans for regulating the expression of their own genomes or host genomes temporally and spatially to ensure efficient virus proliferation and/or latency in host cells. These RNAs include subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs), viral genomic RNA itself, and many types of noncoding viral RNAs.For example, the adenovirus virus-associated RNAs (VA RNAs) (23) are small noncoding RNA transcripts. They inhibit the activation of RNA-induced protein kinase and thereby interfere with the activation of the interferon-induced cellular antiviral defense systems (38). VA RNAs also interfere with RNA interference pathways by acting as substrates for Dicer and suppressing the activity of Dicer probably involved in cellular antiviral mechanisms (2, 55). Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNAs (EBERs) (56) inhibit RNA-induced protein kinase as VA RNAs (38). They also are known to encode microRNAs, which are thought to work for persistent infection (28). On the other hand, recently, EBERs have been reported to be recognized by RIG-I, a cytosolic protein with a DexD/H box RNA helicase domain that recognizes viral RNA in mammalian cells, and to activate signaling to induce type I interferon (35). Thus, associations of viral small RNAs with virus infection are complicated.sgRNAs also fun...
The genome of Red clover necrotic mosaic virus (RCNMV) consists of RNA1 and RNA2, both lacking a cap structure and a poly(A)tail. RNA1 has a translational enhancer element (3'TE-DR1) in the 3' untranslated region (UTR). In this study, we analyzed the roles of 5' and 3' UTRs of RNA1 in 3'TE-DR1-mediated cap-independent translation in cowpea and tobacco BY-2 protoplasts using a dual-luciferase (Luc) reporter assay system. Most mutations introduced into RNA1 5' UTR in reporter Luc mRNA abolished or greatly reduced cap-independent translation in BY-2 protoplasts, whereas those mutations had no or much milder effects if any on translational activity in cowpea protoplasts. Our results suggest that a stem-loop structure predicted in the 5' proximal region of RNA1 plays important roles in both translation and RNA stability. We also show that 3'TE-DR1-mediated cap-independent translation relies on a ribosome-scanning mechanism in both protoplasts.
Both neem extract and azadirachtin are widely used in agriculture as organic pesticides because they are nontoxic to humans, animals, and the environment. However, their effects on soil microorganisms and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which directly affect soil quality, remain largely unexplored. In this study, the effects of neem extract and azadirachtin on the activity of soil microbes and rhizosphere microorganisms was evaluated. We found that 0.1 and 0.4 gmL -1 of the extract and 1.25 and 2.5 µgmL -1 of azadirachtin inhibited the activity of soil microorganisms in vitro. Treating soil with azadirachtin for two months reduced the number of microorganisms present, while two months of treatment with neem extract increased the number of microorganisms in both the soil and the rhizosphere. The phytopathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum was more resistant to azadirachtin than Rhizobium sp. Moreover, treatment of mung beans with neem extract or azadirachtin reduced the number of root nodules and Trichoderma asperellum in the rhizosphere, when compared to the control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.