Despite its longer procedure time and higher perforation rate, ESD resulted in higher en bloc resection and curative rates compared with EMR and all ESD perforations were successfully managed by conservative endoscopic treatment.

Trainee endoscopists are able to perform colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection without serious complications under the guidance of experienced specialists. They can perform it safely and independently after preparatory training and experience with ≥ 30 cases.

No abstract

ESD is safe and effective for the treatment of recurrent or residual colorectal tumors. However, because of its technical difficulty, the en bloc resection rate is lower than that for the treatment of nonrecurrent lesions.

No abstract

Background and Study Aims There are a few reports about the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). However, there is no detailed analysis that divides EGJ cancers into Barrett’s adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of ESD for EGJ cancers, comparing these two adenocarcinomas. Patients and Methods This study included 43 patients who underwent ESD for type II EGJ cancers between 2004 and 2011. Pathological examination of resected specimens confirmed 14 cases of Barrett’s adenocarcinoma and 29 cases of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Cutting margins on the oral side were placed 1 cm from the squamocolumnar junction, or 1 cm away from the slight elevation that is an endoscopic sign of subsquamous carcinoma extension. Clinical outcomes, prevalence and length of subsquamous carcinoma extension, and long-term outcomes were compared between these two types of adenocarcinoma. Results No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between these two types of adenocarcinoma (en bloc, 100 % versus 100 %; complete, 100 % versus 89.7 %; curative, 85.7 % versus 75.9 %). No serious adverse events were encountered. The prevalence of subsquamous carcinoma extension was significantly higher in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma compared with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Local and distant recurrence were not observed in any cases with curative resection during the follow-up period (1.6 – 87.6 months). Conclusion ESD for EGJ cancers, including both Barrett’s adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, was efficient and useful. ESD with a 1 cm safety margin may be acceptable for EGJ cancers.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a feasible technique for treating large superficial colorectal tumors because it provides a higher en-bloc resection rate and is less invasive than surgical resection.

Locoregional steroid injections could be efficient for the prevention of stricture formation after ESD for superficial esophageal cancer.