No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

A case of acute compartment syndrome of the forefoot after revisional arthroplasty of the forefoot is presented. Shortening of the compartments due to bony resection and extensive dissection due to previous scarring may have predisposed to the pathological condition. Prompt decompression based on clinical grounds prevented any long term sequelae. Allowance must be made for the concomitant use of local anaesthetic procedures which may obscure the clinical picture.

We designed an experimental study to prove the existence of the popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and to define its role in providing static stability of the knee. We also examined the contribution of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). We found this ligament to be present in all eight human cadaver knees examined. These specimens were mounted on a specially designed rig and subjected to posterior, varus and external rotational forces. We used the technique of selective sectioning of ligaments and measured the displacement with a constant force applied, before and after its division. We recorded the displacement in primary posterior translation, coupled external rotation, primary varus angulation and primary external rotation. Statistical analysis using the standard error of the mean by plotting 95% confidence intervals, was used to evaluate the results. The PFL had a significant role in preventing excessive posterior translation and varus angulation, and in restricting excessive primary and coupled external rotation. Isolated section of the belly of popliteus did not cause significant posterolateral instability of the knee. The LCL was also seen to act as a primary restraint against varus angulation and secondary restraint against external rotation and posterior displacement. Our findings showed that in knees with isolated disruption of the PFL stability was restored when it was reconstructed. However in knees in which the LCL was also disrupted, isolated reconstruction of the PFL did not restore stability.

We describe a posterior approach to the elbow which combines the advantages of both splitting and reflecting the triceps. It gives protection to the ulnar nerve and its blood supply during the operation while providing excellent exposure of the distal humerus. During closure, the triceps muscle can be tensioned, thereby improving stability of the elbow. This approach has particular relevance to unlinked total elbow arthroplasty allowing early rehabilitation of the joint. [Br] 1999;81-B:1020-2. J Bone Joint Surg Received 2 December 1998; Accepted after revision 23 April 1999Many surgical approaches to the elbow have been described, of which the posterior is the most common. It provides excellent access for the fixation of fractures of the distal humerus and olecranon, and is the approach used most commonly for total elbow arthroplasty. [1][2][3][4] In the posterior approach the triceps 3,5,6 is either split or reflected 4,7 or the olecranon is divided.

In 28 patients with a solitary diagnosis of instability of the trapeziometacarpal joint because of a rupture of the anterior oblique ligament, reconstruction was carried out using a slip of the tendon of flexor carpi radialis. We were able to review 26 patients. The results after a follow-up of four years seven months showed that most (87%) had significant relief from pain and symptoms. Seventeen were graded as good to excellent. The mean grip strength recovered to 86% of the contralateral side. Most patients (81%) felt that they had subjective improvement and would have undergone the operation again. A lesser functional result was seen in those who developed a flexion deformity because of overtightening of the reconstruction. Increased awareness of this lesion can lead to an early and clear diagnosis so that the patient may be advised adequately. We describe a specific, diagnostic, clinical test which we have used consistently and successfully.

We describe a technique of soft-tissue reconstruction which is effective for the treatment of chronic lunotriquetral instability. Part of extensor carpi ulnaris is harvested with its distal attachment preserved. It is passed through two drill holes in the triquetrum and sutured to itself. This stabilises the ulnar side of the wrist. We have reviewed 46 patients who underwent this procedure for post-traumatic lunotriquetral instability with clinical signs suggestive of ulnar-sided carpal instability. Standard radiographs were normal. All patients had pre-operative arthroscopy of the wrist at which dynamic lunotriquetral instability was demonstrated. A clinical rating system for the wrist by the Mayo clinic was used to measure the outcome. In 19 patients the result was excellent, in ten good, in 11 satisfactory and in six poor. On questioning, 40 (87%) patients said that surgery had substantially improved the condition and that they would recommend the operation. However, six (13%) were unhappy with the outcome and would not undergo the procedure again for a similar problem. There were six complications, five of which related to pisotriquetral problems. The mean follow-up was 39.1 months (6 to 100). We believe that tenodesis of extensor carpi ulnaris is a very satisfactory procedure for isolated, chronic post-traumatic lunotriquetral instability in selected patients. In those with associated pathology, the symptoms were improved, but the results were less predictable.