SummaryBackgroundIntracerebral haemorrhage growth is associated with poor clinical outcome and is a therapeutic target for improving outcome. We aimed to determine the absolute risk and predictors of intracerebral haemorrhage growth, develop and validate prediction models, and evaluate the added value of CT angiography.MethodsIn a systematic review of OVID MEDLINE—with additional hand-searching of relevant studies' bibliographies— from Jan 1, 1970, to Dec 31, 2015, we identified observational cohorts and randomised trials with repeat scanning protocols that included at least ten patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage. We sought individual patient-level data from corresponding authors for patients aged 18 years or older with data available from brain imaging initially done 0·5–24 h and repeated fewer than 6 days after symptom onset, who had baseline intracerebral haemorrhage volume of less than 150 mL, and did not undergo acute treatment that might reduce intracerebral haemorrhage volume. We estimated the absolute risk and predictors of the primary outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage growth (defined as >6 mL increase in intracerebral haemorrhage volume on repeat imaging) using multivariable logistic regression models in development and validation cohorts in four subgroups of patients, using a hierarchical approach: patients not taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset (who constituted the largest subgroup), patients taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset, patients from cohorts that included at least some patients taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset, and patients for whom both information about anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset and spot sign on acute CT angiography were known.FindingsOf 4191 studies identified, 77 were eligible for inclusion. Overall, 36 (47%) cohorts provided data on 5435 eligible patients. 5076 of these patients were not taking anticoagulant therapy at symptom onset (median age 67 years, IQR 56–76), of whom 1009 (20%) had intracerebral haemorrhage growth. Multivariable models of patients with data on antiplatelet therapy use, data on anticoagulant therapy use, and assessment of CT angiography spot sign at symptom onset showed that time from symptom onset to baseline imaging (odds ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·36–0·70; p<0·0001), intracerebral haemorrhage volume on baseline imaging (7·18, 4·46–11·60; p<0·0001), antiplatelet use (1·68, 1·06–2·66; p=0·026), and anticoagulant use (3·48, 1·96–6·16; p<0·0001) were independent predictors of intracerebral haemorrhage growth (C-index 0·78, 95% CI 0·75–0·82). Addition of CT angiography spot sign (odds ratio 4·46, 95% CI 2·95–6·75; p<0·0001) to the model increased the C-index by 0·05 (95% CI 0·03–0·07).InterpretationIn this large patient-level meta-analysis, models using four or five predictors had acceptable to good discrimination. These models could inform the location and frequency of observations on patients in clinical practice, explain treatment effects i...

BackgroundLeukoaraiosis and collateral blood flow are processes that involve small vessels, the former related to flow within the deep perforating arterioles and the latter involving the small, cortical pial-pial connections, both of which are independently used to predict cerebrovascular events and treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate their relationship to each other.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for stroke with pre-procedural CT imaging within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Leukoaraiosis was graded by the total Fazekas score on non-contrast CT, periventricular white matter (PVWM) and deep white matter (DWM) scores, both ranging from 0 to 3. Collateral cerebral blood flow was measured by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Radiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) collateral scale.Results178 patients were included with a mean age of 67.6±14.8 years. We found an inverse relationship between total Fazekas score and collateral flow (p<0.0001). Among patients with good collaterals, 75.1% had total Fazekas scores of 0–2, compared with 36.6% of patients with moderate collaterals and 32.7% of patients with poor collaterals with total Fazekas scores of 0–2. Mean Fazekas scores were 1.6±1.5, 3.1±1.5 and 3.4±1.6 for good, moderate and poor collaterals, respectively (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, total Fazekas score was the only variable independently associated with collateral status (p<0.0001).ConclusionsIncreasing severity of leukoaraiosis is associated with poor collateral grade among ischemic stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. These findings suggest that leukoaraiosis may be a marker for global cerebrovascular dysfunction.

Differences in all major outcome measures were markedly better in patients with complete versus incomplete but still 'successful' revascularization using prior thresholds, with ORs in the order of those seen in recent definitive trials comparing EVT to an intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Background and purposeThe Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a commonly used scoring system to select patients with stroke for endovascular treatment (EVT). However, the inter- and intra-reader variability is high.ObjectiveTo determine whether the inter- and intra-reader variability is different for various regions of the ASPECTS scoring system by evaluating the interobserver variability of ASPECTS between different readers in a per-region analysis.Materials and methodsAll patients with acute ischemic stroke who proceeded to EVT in our institutions over a 4-year period were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Images were reviewed by two experienced neuroradiologists, who recalculated the ASPECTS independently. We examined each region of the ASPECTS system to evaluate agreement between the raters in each area.Results375 patients were included. The median total ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8–9). The most common region showing ischemic change was the insula, with the M6 region being least commonly affected. Overall interobserver agreement for ASPECTS using Cohen’s κ was 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.61). The region with the highest agreement was the insula (κ=0.56; 0.48 to 0.64). The region with the lowest agreement was M3 (κ=0.34; 0.12 to 0.56). Agreement was relatively good when ASPECTS were dichotomized into 0–5 versus 6–10 (κ=0.66; 0.49 to 0.84).ConclusionsSubstantial interobserver variability is found when calculating ASPECTS. This variability is region dependent, and practitioners should take this into account when using ASPECTS for treatment decisions in patients with acute stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in adults, but our ability to prognosticate from baseline imaging data is limited. The ASPECTS measures ischemic change in the middle cerebral artery territory on noncontrast CT based on 10 anatomic regions. Here, we investigated whether infarction in particular regions was associated with worse long-term outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We identified consecutive patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy for ICA/MCA occlusion at 2 comprehensive stroke centers. Pretreatment ASPECTS was assessed by 2 blinded reviewers. Clinical data including demographics, baseline NIHSS score, and 90-day mRS were collected. The relationship between individual ASPECTS regions and the mRS score (0-2 versus 3-6) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-three patients were included (mean age, 70 years; 46% men), of whom 214 had poor outcome (mRS ¼ 3-6). Caudate (OR ¼ 3.26; 95% CI, 1.33-8.82), M4 region (OR ¼ 2.94; 95% CI, 1.09-9.46), and insula (OR ¼ 1.75; 95% CI, 1.08-2.85) infarcts were associated with significantly greater odds of poor outcome, whereas M1 region infarction reduced the odds of poor outcome (OR ¼ 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.99). This finding remained unchanged when restricted to only patients with good recanalization. No significant associations were found by laterality. Similarly, no region was predictive of neurologic improvement during the first 24 hours or of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS:Our results indicate that ASPECTS regions are not equal in their contribution to functional outcome. This finding suggests that patient selection based on total ASPECTS alone might be insufficient, and infarct topography should be considered when deciding eligibility for thrombectomy.

IntroductionManagement approaches for intracranial atherosclerosis include medical, surgical, or endovascular treatment. Among endovascular treatments, recent studies have stated that submaximal angioplasty (SA) may offer considerable benefits and be a promising alternative to aggressive medical therapyand/or stenting in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD).ObjectiveTo investigate the rates of periprocedural and long-term cerebrovascular accidents, mortality, and restenosis in patients with symptomatic ICAD who were treated with SA.MethodsAn electronic database search was performed for relevant studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with ICAD following SA. Outcomes of interest were incidence of transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage, stroke, and mortality in the periprocedural period and at 1 year. The periprocedural period was defined as the time from SA until 30 days after the procedure. Technical success and restenosis rates after the procedure were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 19 studies with 777 patients were identified. The technical success rate was 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%). The incidence of 30-day and 1-year stroke (all types) was 3% (95% CI 1% to 5%) and 5% (95% CI 4% to 8%), respectively. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality was found to be 1% (95% CI 0% to 2%) and 2% (95% CI 0% to 4%), respectively. The combined incidence of stroke or death was 5% (95% CI 3% to 8%) at 30 days, and 9% (95% CI 7% to 12%) at 1 year.ConclusionThe findings suggest that SA might be a promising alternative treatment in the treatment of symptomatic ICAD due to its favorable technical profile, periprocedural safety, and long-term efficacy. A randomized clinical trial is warranted to compare the safety and efficacy of SA with 'gold standard' medical treatment.

Background and purposeThe Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a widely used measure of ischemic change on non-contrast CT. Although predictive of long-term outcome, ASPECTS is limited by its modest interobserver agreement. One potential solution to this is the use of machine learning strategies, such as e-ASPECTS, to detect ischemia. Here, we compared e-ASPECTS with manual scoring by experienced neuroradiologists for all 10 individual ASPECTS regions.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 178 baseline non-contrast CT scans from patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. All scans were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists with a third reader arbitrating disagreements for a consensus read. Each ASPECTS region was scored individually. All scans were then evaluated using a machine learning-based software package (e-ASPECTS, Brainomix). Interobserver agreement between readers and the software for each region was calculated with a kappa statistic.ResultsThe median ASPECTS was 9 for manual scoring and 8.5 for e-ASPECTS, with an overall agreement of κ=0.248. Regional agreement varied from κ=0.094 (M1) to κ=0.555 (lentiform), with better performance in subcortical regions. When corrected for the low number of infarcts in any given region, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa ranged from 0.483 (insula) to 0.888 (M3), with greater agreement for cortical areas. Intraclass correlation coefficients were between 0.09 (M1) and 0.556 (lentiform).ConclusionManual scoring and e-ASPECTS had fair agreement in our dataset on a per-region basis. This warrants further investigation using follow-up scans or MRI as the gold standard measure of true ASPECTS.

BACKGROUND: Weighting neuroimaging findings based on eloquence can improve the predictive value of ASPECTS, possibly aiding in informed treatment decisions for acute ischemic stroke. PURPOSE:Our aim was to study the contribution of region-specific ASPECTS infarction to acute ischemic stroke outcomes. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports on ASPECTS in patients with acute ischemic stroke from 2000 to March 2019.STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed articles and extracted data. Three-month poor functional outcome defined as mRS .2 was the primary end point.DATA ANALYSIS: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare the association between infarct and mRS .2 among ASPECTS regions. Subanalyses included the following: laterality of stroke (left/right), imaging technique (NCCT or advanced imaging with DWI, CTP, or CTA), and interventional technique (IV-tPA/conservative management or mechanical thrombectomy).DATA SYNTHESIS: M6 infarct was most associated with poor functional outcome (OR ¼ 3.26; 95% CI, 2.21-4.80; P , .001). Pair-wise comparisons of ASPECTS regions regarding the association between infarct and mRS .2 were not significant, with the exception of M6 versus lentiform (P ¼ .009). However, pair-wise comparisons among ASPECTS regions were not significant among subgroup analyses.LIMITATIONS: Limitations were the heterogeneity of time points, neuroimaging modalities, and interventional techniques; limited studies for inclusion; publication bias among some comparisons; and the retrospective nature of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated an unequal impact of some ASPECTS subregions in predicting outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke laterality, imaging technique, and interventional technique subgroup analyses showed no differences among ASPECTS regions in predicting outcome. Investigation in larger cohorts is required to assess the association of ASPECTS with acute ischemic stroke outcome.ABBREVIATIONS: AIS ¼ acute ischemic stroke; M1 ¼ anterior inferior frontal lobe; M2 ¼ temporal lobe; M3 ¼ inferior parietal and posterior temporal lobe; M4 ¼ anterior superior frontal lobe; M5 ¼ precentral and superior frontal lobe; M6 ¼ superior parietal lobe; MT ¼ mechanical thrombectomy; PRISMA ¼ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis