2018
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining ‘success’: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between incomplete and complete revascularization

Abstract: Differences in all major outcome measures were markedly better in patients with complete versus incomplete but still 'successful' revascularization using prior thresholds, with ORs in the order of those seen in recent definitive trials comparing EVT to an intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(3 reference statements)
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study demonstrated that the effect of mTICI-3 reperfusion was not significantly modified by patients' baseline characteristics such as age, sex, NIHSS score, ASPECTS, and target occlusion location among patients www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ with anterior circulation occlusion. Previous studies have reported the effect of complete reperfusion on outcomes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][22][23][24] , but the heterogeneity of this effect according to patients' characteristics has not been fully investigated. Although the superiority of mTICI-3 reperfusion did not reach statistical significance in some subgroups, presumably due to insufficient power, our findings provide further support for the importance of achieving mTICI-3 reperfusion regardless of the baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study demonstrated that the effect of mTICI-3 reperfusion was not significantly modified by patients' baseline characteristics such as age, sex, NIHSS score, ASPECTS, and target occlusion location among patients www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ with anterior circulation occlusion. Previous studies have reported the effect of complete reperfusion on outcomes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][22][23][24] , but the heterogeneity of this effect according to patients' characteristics has not been fully investigated. Although the superiority of mTICI-3 reperfusion did not reach statistical significance in some subgroups, presumably due to insufficient power, our findings provide further support for the importance of achieving mTICI-3 reperfusion regardless of the baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful reperfusion in endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is commonly defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scores of 2b or 3 [1][2][3] . It has been shown that outcomes of patients with complete reperfusion (mTICI-3) are superior to those with incomplete reperfusion (mTICI-2b) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] , and the importance of achieving mTICI-3 reperfusion is remarked. However, whether the superiority of mTICI-3 is retained in any patient subgroups has not been fully investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical outcome after MT can be improved by an increasing degree of reperfusion evaluated by the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) scale [3,4]. Accordingly, complete reperfusion (TICI 3) is leading to a markedly better outcome with the highest rate of excellent functional outcome (mRS ≤ 1) [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TICI-3 patients fared dramatically better than TICI-2B across all outcome measures, including modified Rankin scores and mortality rates 1. This analysis raises two important issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The meta-analysis by Rizvi et al comparing patients with TICI-3 versus TICI-2B revascularization redefines the meaning of ‘successful’ recanalization 1. TICI-3 patients fared dramatically better than TICI-2B across all outcome measures, including modified Rankin scores and mortality rates 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%