: DALK using the big-bubble technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure for eyes with moderate to advanced keratoconus. In case of extensive intraoperative DM perforation, it does not pose any limitation to ongoing penetrating keratoplasty.
A transparent cornea is essential for the formation of a clear image on the
retina. The human cornea is arranged into well-organized layers, and each layer
plays a significant role in maintaining the transparency and viability of the
tissue. The endothelium has both barrier and pump functions, which are important
for the maintenance of corneal clarity. Many etiologies, including Fuchs’
endothelial corneal dystrophy, surgical trauma, and congenital hereditary
endothelial dystrophy, lead to endothelial cell dysfunction. The main treatment
for corneal decompensation is replacement of the abnormal corneal layers with
normal donor tissue. Nowadays, the trend is to perform selective endothelial
keratoplasty, including Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
and Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty, to manage corneal endothelial
dysfunction. This selective approach has several advantages over penetrating
keratoplasty, including rapid recovery of visual acuity, less likelihood of
graft rejection, and better patient satisfaction. However, the global limitation
in the supply of donor corneas is becoming an increasing challenge,
necessitating alternatives to reduce this demand. Consequently, in
vitro expansion of human corneal endothelial cells is evolving as a
sustainable choice. This method is intended to prepare corneal endothelial cells
in vitro that can be transferred to the eye. Herein, we
describe the etiologies and manifestations of human corneal endothelial cell
dysfunction. We also summarize the available options for as well as recent
developments in the management of corneal endothelial dysfunction.
DALK is an effective alternative surgical procedure for patients with keratoconus; the outcomes are comparable to PK in terms of refractive errors, BCVA, CSF, and HOAs.
A successful corneal graft requires both clarity and an acceptable refraction. A clear corneal graft may be an optical failure if high astigmatism limits visual acuity. Intraoperative measures to reduce postkeratoplasty astigmatism include round and central trephination of cornea with an adequate size, appropriate sutures with evenly distributed tension, and perfect graft-host apposition. Suture manipulation has been described for minimising early postoperative astigmatism. If significant astigmatism remains after suture removal, which cannot be corrected by optical means, then further surgical procedures containing relaxing incisions, compression sutures, laser refractive surgery, insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments, wedge resection, and toric intraocular lens implantation can be performed. When astigmatism cannot be reduced using one or more abovementioned approaches, repeat penetrating keratoplasty should inevitably be considered. However, none of these techniques has emerged as an ideal one, and corneal surgeons may require combining two or more approaches to exploit the maximum advantages.
Pterygium is a relatively common ocular surface disease. The clinical aspects and the treatment options have been studied since many years ago, but many uncertainties still exist. The core pathologic pathway and the role of heredity in the development of pterygium are still attractive fields for the researchers. The role of pterygium in corneal irregularities, in addition to the refractive properties of pterygium removal, has been increasingly recognized through numerous studies. The association between pterygium and ocular surface neoplasia is challenging the traditional beliefs regarding the safe profile of the disease. The need for a comprehensive clinical classification system has encouraged homogenization of trials and prediction of the recurrence rate of the pterygium following surgical removal. Evolving surgical methods have been associated with some complications, whose diagnosis and management are necessary for ophthalmic surgeons. According to the review, the main risk factor of pterygium progression remains to be the ultraviolet exposure. A major part of the clinical evaluation should consist of differentiating between typical and atypical pterygia, where the latter may be associated with the risk of ocular surface neoplasia. The effect of pterygium on astigmatism and the aberrations of the cornea may evoke the need for an early removal with a purpose of reducing secondary refractive error. Among the surgical methods, conjunctival or conjunctival-limbal autografting seems to be the first choice for ophthalmic surgeons because the recurrence rate following the procedure has been reported to be lower, compared with other procedures. The use of adjuvant options is supported in the literature, where intraoperative and postoperative mitomycin C has been the adjuvant treatment of choice. The efficacy and safety of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents and cyclosporine have been postulated; however, their exact role in the treatment of the pterygium requires further studies.
Angiogenesis refers to new blood vessels that originate from pre-existing vascular structures. Corneal neovascularization which can lead to compromised visual acuity occurs in a wide variety of corneal pathologies. A large subset of measures has been advocated to prevent and/or treat corneal neovascularization with varying degrees of success. These approaches include topical corticosteroid administration, laser treatment, cautery, and fine needle diathermy. Since the imbalance between proangiogenic agents and antiangiogenic agents primarily mediate the process of corneal neovascularization, recent therapies are intended to disrupt the different steps in the synthesis and actions of proangiogenic factors. These approaches, however, are only partially effective and may lead to several side effects. The aim of this article is to review the most relevant treatments for corneal neovascularization available so far.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.