PurposeTo identify prognostic factors in patients referred with endophthalmitis after cataract surgery, and to evaluate the efficacy of primary vitrectomy as an initial management.MethodsOver an eight-year study period, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 164 patients who were referred with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. Treatment generally conformed to standard guidelines, although primary vitrectomy was performed in several eyes with a visual acuity of hand motion or better, depending on the patient's status. Using multivariate analysis, we analyzed outcomes to determine the effect on final visual outcome.ResultsA final visual acuity of ≥20/40 was achieved in 92/164 (56.1%) cases after treatment. Bacterial cultures showed bacterial growth in 89/164 cases (54.3%). Among the various baseline characteristics, old age (P=0.028), poor visual acuity at presentation (P=0.004), gram-negative bacterial infection (P=0.030), and short time between cataract surgery and signs of endophthalmitis (P=0.021) were associated with poor visual outcome. The visual outcome showed no significant difference, in terms of initial treatment feature, between the primary vitrectomy with intraocular antibiotics injection (IOAI) and IOAI-only groups. However, reintervention was significantly less frequent in the primary vitrectomy group than in the IOAI group (12.5 and 32.7%, respectively; P=0.002).ConclusionOld age, poor visual acuity at presentation, type of cultured organism (gram-negative bacteria), and early onset of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery were significantly related to poor visual outcome after endophthalmitis treatment. Primary vitrectomy may decrease the need for reintervention to control infection, although the treatment showed no benefits with regard to visual outcome.

NCT02597855, Results.

This paper aims to compare the effects of three treatment modalities for a submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Seventy-seven patients with an SMH were divided into three groups: small-sized (optic disc diameter (ODD) ≥ 1 to < 4), medium-sized (ODD ≥ 4 within the temporal arcade) and large-sized (ODD ≥ 4, exceeding the temporal arcade). Patients received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy, pneumatic displacement (PD) with anti-VEGF or a vitrectomy with a subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and gas tamponade based on the surgeon’s discretion. The functional and anatomical outcomes were evaluated. Among the 77 eyes, 45 eyes had a small-sized, 21 eyes had a medium-sized and 11 eyes had a large-sized SMH. In the small-sized group, all treatment modalities showed a gradual best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement with high hemorrhagic regression or displacement rates (over 75%). In the medium-sized group, PD and surgery were associated with better BCVA with more displacement than anti-VEGF monotherapy (67% and 83%, respectively, vs. 33%). In the large-sized group, surgery showed a better visual improvement with a higher displacement rate than PD (86% vs. 25%). Our findings demonstrated that visual improvement can be expected through appropriate treatment strategy regardless of the SMH size. In cases with a larger SMH, invasive techniques including PD or surgery were more advantageous than anti-VEGF monotherapy.

No abstract

BackgroundIntravitreal injection is widely used to treat retinal vein occlusion, and acute angle closure (AAC) is an exceptional complication of intravitreal injection. The authors report a case of AAC that occurred immediately after administering intravitreal bevacizumab to treat branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Case presentationA 65-year-old woman was referred to the retina clinic of a tertiary referral center for the treatment of macular edema secondary to BRVO. On slit lamp examination, anterior chamber (AC) depth was shallow (3 corneal thicknesses centrally, 1/4 corneal thicknesses peripherally) in both eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 19 mmHg in both eyes, and refractive error was +1.00 diopter sphere in both eyes. A gonioscopy exam demonstrated narrow angle of over 180° in both eyes. To treat the macular edema, bevacizumab was injected into her right eye intravitreally. After two bevacizumab injections, the macular edema regressed but recurred 5 months later, and thus, a third injection was performed. The next day, she visited our emergency department complaining of persistent ocular pain in her right eye. The right pupil had dilated to 6 mm diameter and was fixed. Slit lamp exam revealed diffuse corneal edema in her right eye, which had an IOP of 56 mmHg. After administration of intravenous mannitol, the IOP fell to 14 mmHg and the corneal edema disappeared. Subsequently, a glaucoma specialist performed laser iridotomy on the right eye.ConclusionsAlthough AAC is a rare complication of intravitreal injection, it can occur in a patient with risk factors such as hyperopic eye or narrow angle.

AimsTo investigate the lowest effective fluence rate of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).MethodsFifty-one eyes of 51 patients with chronic CSC were randomly treated with 30% (n=15), 40% (n=16) or 50% (n=17) of the standard-fluence rate of PDT and followed up for 12 months. The success rate, recurrence rate, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), integrity of the outer retinal layer and complications were evaluated at baseline and at the follow-up periods after PDT.ResultsThe rate of complete subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution in the 30%-fluence, 40%-fluence and 50%-fluence groups was 60.0%, 81.2% and 100.0%, respectively, at 3 months (p=0.009), and 80.0%, 94.0% and 100.0%, respectively, at 12 months (p=0.06). The recurrence rate in the 50%-fluence group was lower than that in the 30%- and 40%-fluence groups at 12 months (30% vs 50%, 40% vs 50%; p=0.002, p=0.030, respectively (log-rank test)). The mean BCVA improved significantly 12 months after PDT only in the 40%- and 50%-fluence groups (p=0.005, p=0.003, respectively). Mean CFT and SFCT decreased significantly at 12 months in the three groups. The rate of complications did not differ significantly among the three groups.ConclusionsA 50%-fluence rate of PDT seems to be the most effective for treating chronic CSC, considering the low recurrence rate and high rate of complete SRF resolution, compared with other low-fluence PDT.Trial registration numberNCT01630863.

In ME following BRVO, baseline visual acuity correlates with macular ischemia and baseline CRT. Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment results in significant anatomical and functional improvement regardless of baseline visual acuity.

Purpose:To evaluate the repeatability of non-invasive tear film break-up time and identify its relationships with dry eye parameters. Methods: A total of 100 participants (50 with dry eye, and 50 in the control group) were enrolled prospectively. Non-invasive keratograph first (NIKf-BUT) and average (NIKav-BUT) break-up times were evaluated 2 times using Keratograph 4 (Oculus, Wetzler, Germany), and then tear film break-up time with fluorescein (FBUT) was measured. The correlation analyses were performed between non-invasive parameters (NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT) and FBUT. Intra-observer agreements of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique was used to evaluate the non-invasive method in the diagnosis of dry eye. Results: The correlation analyses revealed positive correlation between NIKav-BUT and FBUT in both groups (dry eye; r = 0.66, p < 0.001 and control group; r = 0.77, p < 0.001). The ICCs of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were 0.72 and 0.94 in the dry eye, respectively, and 0.70 and 0.91 in the control group. NIKav-BUT was not different from FBUT in either group. The areas under the ROC curves of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were 0.917 and 0.980, respectively. Conclusions: The high ICCs verified the repeatability of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT. NIKav-BUT showed no difference from FBUT and positive correlation with FBUT. NIK-BUT showed high diagnostic power and can be considered a new parameter to evaluate dry eye syndrome.