The rationale behind intradiscal O 2 -O 3 therapy is the pain elicited by the mechanical compression of the nerve root, which is associated with periganglionic and periradicular inflammation. This study aimed to determine the effect of intradiscal ozone injection on pain score and satisfaction of patients with low back pain (LBP) secondary to disc herniation. Patients with LBP diagnosed with disc herniation were enrolled in this clinical trial. After prepping and draping the area, intradiscal injection of ozone/oxygen mixture (10 ml, 25μg/ml) was performed under fluoroscopy guide (c-arm). Pain score and patient satisfaction were assessed prior to the injection (baseline) and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the injection. Sixty three patients (24 males, 39 females) with mean age of 53.3 ±2.0 y enrolled in the study. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of pain score before intervention was 6.968 ±0.11. Pain score was reduced to 4.25±0.19 at 1 month, 4.33±0.20 at 3 months, 4.87 ±0.21 at 6 months and 5.22 ±0.20 at 24 months. According to the modified MacNab scale success of pain relief was as follows: excellent: 4 (6.3%),
Patients administered ondansetron 100 μg/kg or granisetron 40 μg/kg 20 to 30 minutes before the end of LC had significantly higher PONV control during the 24-hour postoperative observation period than patients receiving placebo. However, there were no significant differences between the active treatment groups in the incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction, or AEs.
Although many patients with LBP benefit from conservative treatment methods such as short-term bed rest, medical therapy, lifestyle changes, and physical therapy and exercise, approximately 7% experience chronic pain (16). Moreover, 15% of those with chronic LBP require surgery (4). Although microdiscectomy, the most effective method for surgical treatment of lumbar herniated discs, provides satisfactory results, it can result in several complications such as recurrence, █ INTRODUCTION I n industrialized countries, approximately 80% of the population experiences an episode of low back pain (LBP) at least once in their lifetime (5). There are many pathologies and specific anatomic locations that may lead to LBP, but intervertebral disc herniation is recognized as one of the most common causes (7).
AIM:To describe the intra-and postoperative results of patients who received a transforaminal anterior epidural steroid injection (TAESI) prior to lumbar microdiscectomy.
MATERIAL and METHODS:Sixty-four patients who did not improve after minimally invasive techniques (MIT) for lumbar radiculopathy were evaluated. Thirty-two of them treated with techniques other than TAESI and those receiving thrombolytic or anticoagulant drugs before microdiscectomy were excluded. We recorded the type of MIT, numbers of levels and injections, time interval between the last MIT and microdiscectomy, duration of surgery, amount of intraoperative blood loss, rate of incidental durotomy, postoperative infection, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for leg pain before and after microdiscectomy at 24 hours, and the 1 st and 3 rd months (Group 1). A total of 35 patients with no history of MIT or lumbar surgery who had undergone unilateral, single-level lumbar microdiscectomy at our clinic were randomly selected to be included in the control group (Group 2) and same parameters were recorded for the comparison of both groups.
RESULTS:The mean duration of lumbar discectomy was 140 minutes, and the amount of average intraoperative blood loss was 227 cc in the study group (Group 1), and 65 minutes and 73 cc, respectively in the control group (Group 2)(p>0.05). The comparison of VAS scores revealed that lumbar discectomy was still effective after TAESI (p=0.00).
CONCLUSION:Although epidural steroid injection is an effective modality for the management of chronic pain, these patients should be informed preoperatively about the relatively long duration of surgery and the possible requirement for blood transfusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.