IntroductionThe Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q) is designed to evaluate the sexual life of women for satisfaction, orgasm, desire, and pelvic problem interference. The SHOW-Q is important for evaluating worsening of sexual life for patients with pelvic problems and the management of these women to improve their sexual life.AimsTo validate the Turkish versions of the SHOW-Q for Turkish-speaking women.MethodsThe Turkish version of the SHOW-Q was generated by two independent professional English-to-Turkish translators. The translated version of the SHOW-Q was reverse translated by two bilingual translators whose native language was English. Women with at least one symptom related to pelvic problems (n = 71) and those with no symptoms (n = 38) were included in the present study.Main Outcome MeasuresTest-retest reliability analysis, content-face validity, internal consistency reliability, item-total correlations, convergent validity, construct validity, and factorial validity were performed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish versions of the SHOW-Q.ResultsTest-retest reliability demonstrated good correlation for all subscales. Cronbach α values ranged from 0.735 to 0.892 and indicated high internal consistency. There was a strong correlation for the corresponding subscales between the SHOW-Q and the Female Sexual Function Index. The mean score of each SHOW-Q subscale showed significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.ConclusionThe Turkish version of the SHOW-Q is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to evaluate the sexual life of Turkish-speaking women with different pelvic problems.
Aim: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) has significant consequences on cardiac functions. This study aims to evaluate cardiac functional parameters in late-onset (FGR) fetuses and compare those appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses. Material and Methods: Fifty-six singleton pregnancies were involved in this prospective case-control study. Delphi consensus was used to define late-onset FGR. We compared the E/A ratio, left myocardial performance index (MPI) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in late-onset FGR cases and gestational age-matched AGA fetuses. Results: Twenty-eight late-onset FGR and 28 AGA fetuses were enrolled. The mean gestational age in the late-onset FGR group was 34.1 AE 2.3 weeks and 34.4 AE 2.1 in controls. The E/A ratio was 0.88 AE 0.09 in AGA fetuses, 0.79 AE 0.11 in the late-onset FGR group, and significantly lower in late-onset FGR fetuses (p: 0.012). Left MPI was 0.51 AE 0.09 in AGA and 0.62 AE 0.11 in the late-onset FGR group. Left MPI was markedly higher in late-onset FGR fetuses (p: 0.024). TAPSE was 7.4 AE 2.9 mm in controls and 5.2 AE 1.8 in the late-onset FGR group, and it was significantly shorter in the late-onset FGR fetuses (p: 0.016). Conclusion: Late-onset FGR is associated with cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. Fetal echocardiography may be beneficial to detect those subtle cardiac changes.
Amaç: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi ve Van Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nde NTD tanısı koyulan ve sağlıklı fetüsü olan gebelerin B12 ve folat düzeyini karşılaştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: NTD tanısı koyulan 38 hasta ve 40 kontrol grubu çalışmaya dahil edildi. İstatistiksel analizde ki-kare testi ve Mann-Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: NTD grubunda hiçbir hastada prekonsepsiyonel dönemde folik asit kullanımı yoktu ancak kontrol grubunda 4 (%10) hastada prekonsepsiyonel folik asit kullanımı mevcuttu ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0,04). NTD grubunda 9 (%23.6), kontrol grubunda 32 (%80) hastada ilk trimesterde folik asit desteği alınmıştı ve bu istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0,01). Ortalama B12 seviyesi NTD grubunda 248.7±65.4ng/ml, kontrol grubunda 239.3±27.5 saptandı ve bu fark anlamlı değildi (p=0,78). Ortalama folat seviyesi NTD grubunda 9.6±4.8 ng/ml, kontrol grubunda 9.8±3.9 ng/ml saptandı ve bu fark anlamlı değildi (p=0,62). Sonuç: Her iki grup arasında B12 ve folat seviyeleri farklı değildi ancak, sağlıklı bebeği olan grupta prekonsepsiyonel dönemde ve ilk trimesterde folik asit kullanımı NTD grubuna göre anlamlı olarak daha fazlaydı.
Bu çalışmamızda preterm prematür membran rüptürü (PPROM) ile komplike gebeliklerde spontan travaya giren olgularla çeşitli endikasyonlarla doğum indüksiyonu yapılan olguların perinatal sonuçlarını ve latent sürenin bu sonuçlara etkisini araştırmayı amaçladık.
Aim: Oral glucose challenge test (OGTT) is widely used around the world screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of 75 g OGTT on maternal and fetal Doppler parameters. Material and Methods: Measurements of umbilical artery PI, RI, S/D, middle cerebral artery (MCA) PSV, PI, RI and mean PI, RI S/D of uterine arteries assessed 1 hour before OGTT and 1 hour following the test in 46 pregnancies between 24-28 weeks of gestation. Mann Whitney-U test was employed to compare variables. Statistical significance was established at p<0.05. Results: The mean age of pregnant women was 24.6±5.4, the mean gravity status was 2.3±0.8, the mean BMI was 25.5±5.5 kg/m, and the mean gestational age was 26.5±1.6 Mean umbilical artery PI: 1.14±0.26, RI: 0.71±0.14, S/D ratio 2.24±0.73 calculated 1 hour before test and mean PI: 1.04±0.43, RI: 0.58±0.21, S/D ratio 2.01±0.44 and there was no significance (p: 0.64, 0,56, 0.71). Mean MCA PSV: 30.4±11.3 cm/sn, PI:1.89±0.36, RI: 0.81±0.19 measured 1 hour before test and 1 hour following test Mean MCA were PSV: 38.4±13.2 cm/sn, PI: 2.11±0.24, RI: 0.68± 0.21 and there was no difference (p: 0.83, 0.66, 0.82). Mean uterine arteries PI:1.13±0.21, RI: 0.69±0.11, S/D ratio 2.03±0.34 measured before the test and mean PI:1.24±0.11, RI: 0.74±0.16, S/D ratio 1.87±0.22 calculated after the test and these results were similar (p: 0.72, 0.79, 0.56). Conclusion: There was no significant effect on maternal and fetal Doppler parameters of 75 g OGTT among healthy pregnancies.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine and compare grief, depression, and post-traumatic stress scores in women who underwent termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomaly in the first vs. second-trimester of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-three women who underwent termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly were subdivided into two categories in this prospective-cohort study: First-trimester group, which was defined as termination of pregnancy performed <14 weeks of gestation, and Second-trimester termination of pregnancy who underwent termination of pregnancy between 20 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. Eight weeks after the termination of pregnancy, the Beck Depression Inventory, Perinatal Grief Scale-short version, and Impact of Event Scale-Revised were performed with face-to-face interviews. RESULTS: Twenty-four women in the first-trimester group and 19 women in the second-trimester group were enrolled. The mean Beck Depression Inventory score was 7.3±4.2 in the first-trimester group and 11.1±4.6 in the second-trimester group (p=0.033). The mean Perinatal Grief Scale-short scores were 86.3±17.2 and 101.4±29.2 in the first and second-trimester groups, respectively (p=0.014). Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores of the first trimester and second-trimester groups were 22.5±8.6 and 35.3±17.1, respectively (p=0.022). Depression was detected in 29.1% of women in the first-trimester group and 57.8% in the second-trimester group (p=0.023). Perinatal grief was significantly higher in the second-trimester group (45.8% vs. 84.2% p<0.01). Post-traumatic stress was significantly higher in the second-trimester group (41.6% vs. 73.6%, p=0.031). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly causes severe psychiatric problems in most women. Depression, grief, and post-traumatic stress are more prominent in women who underwent termination of pregnancy in the second trimester of pregnancy than in the first trimester.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.