SummaryThe amyloid‐based prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are heritable aggregates of misfolded proteins, passed to daughter cells following fragmentation by molecular chaperones including the J‐protein Sis1, Hsp70 and Hsp104. Overexpression of Hsp104 efficiently cures cell populations of the prion [PSI +] by an alternative Sis1‐dependent mechanism that is currently the subject of significant debate. Here, we broadly investigate the role of J‐proteins in this process by determining the impact of amyloid polymorphisms (prion variants) on the ability of well‐studied Sis1 constructs to compensate for Sis1 and ask whether any other S. cerevisiae cytosolic J‐proteins are also required for this process. Our comprehensive screen, examining all 13 members of the yeast cytosolic/nuclear J‐protein complement, uncovered significant variant‐dependent genetic evidence for a role of Apj1 (antiprion DnaJ) in this process. For strong, but not weak [PSI +] variants, depletion of Apj1 inhibits Hsp104‐mediated curing. Overexpression of either Apj1 or Sis1 enhances curing, while overexpression of Ydj1 completely blocks it. We also demonstrated that Sis1 was the only J‐protein necessary for the propagation of at least two weak [PSI +] variants and no J‐protein alteration, or even combination of alterations, affected the curing of weak [PSI +] variants, suggesting the possibility of biochemically distinct, variant‐specific Hsp104‐mediated curing mechanisms.

In eukaryotes, an Hsp70 molecular chaperone triad assists folding of nascent chains emerging from the ribosome tunnel. In fungi, the triad consists of canonical Hsp70 Ssb, atypical Hsp70 Ssz1 and J-domain protein cochaperone Zuo1. Zuo1 binds the ribosome at the tunnel exit. Zuo1 also binds Ssz1, tethering it to the ribosome, while its J-domain stimulates Ssb’s ATPase activity to drive efficient nascent chain interaction. But the function of Ssz1 and how Ssb engages at the ribosome are not well understood. Employing in vivo site-specific crosslinking, we found that Ssb(ATP) heterodimerizes with Ssz1. Ssb, in a manner consistent with the ADP conformation, also crosslinks to ribosomal proteins across the tunnel exit from Zuo1. These two modes of Hsp70 Ssb interaction at the ribosome suggest a functionally efficient interaction pathway: first, Ssb(ATP) with Ssz1, allowing optimal J-domain and nascent chain engagement; then, after ATP hydrolysis, Ssb(ADP) directly with the ribosome.

While population level analyses reveal significant roles for CTCF and cohesin in mammalian genome organization, their contribution to chromatin structure and gene regulation at the single-cell level remain incompletely understood. Here, we use chromosome tracing microscopy to measure the effects of removal of CTCF or cohesin on genome folding across genomic scales. We find cohesin contracts the chromosome into loops, facilitating contacts both within and between Topologically Associating Domains (TADs), while increasing the separation along the chromosome arms through steric effects of loop stacking. CTCF organizes these loops radially, favoring interactions among CTCF-marked borders, including 3-way interactions that bridge TAD boundaries in developmentally important domains. Border-distal regions spread out radially from this axis, helping explain CTCF's previously described role in TAD separation. Together our data provide a structural understanding of how cohesin and CTCF reduce stochasticity in 3D folding across genomic scales and help minimize variability in gene expression.

No abstract

Prions are self-propagating protein isoforms that are typically amyloid. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amyloid prion aggregates are fragmented by a trio involving three classes of chaperone proteins: Hsp40s, also known as J-proteins, Hsp70s, and Hsp104. Hsp104, the sole Hsp100-class disaggregase in yeast, along with the Hsp70 Ssa and the J-protein Sis1, is required for the propagation of all known amyloid yeast prions. However, when Hsp104 is ectopically overexpressed, only the prion [PSI + ] is efficiently eliminated from cell populations via a highly debated mechanism that also requires Sis1. Recently, we reported roles for two additional J-proteins, Apj1 and Ydj1, in this process. Deletion of Apj1, a J-protein involved in the degradation of sumoylated proteins, partially blocks Hsp104-mediated [PSI + ] elimination. Apj1 and Sis1 were found to have overlapping functions, as overexpression of one compensates for loss of function of the other. In addition, overexpression of Ydj1, the most abundant J-protein in the yeast cytosol, completely blocks Hsp104-mediated curing. Yeast prions exhibit structural polymorphisms known as "variants"; most intriguingly, these J-protein effects were only observed for strong variants, suggesting variant-specific mechanisms. Here, we review these results and present new data resolving the domains of Apj1 responsible, specifically implicating the involvement of Apj1's Q/S-rich low-complexity domain.

No abstract

No abstract

The amyloid‐based prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are heritable aggregates of misfolded protein, passed to daughter cells following fragmentation by a set of molecular chaperones which includes the J‐protein Sis1, Hsp70, and Hsp104. Overexpression of Hsp104 efficiently cures the prion [PSI+], a phenomenon which has promoted the exploration of Hsp104 as a potential therapeutic agent for neurodegenerative diseases. However, the mechanism of [PSI+] elimination by Hsp104 overexpression has been the subject of significant debate for the past two decades and has garnered significant interest in the recent literature as multiple conflicting models have been proposed. Yeast prion propagation is inexorably reliant on the function of molecular chaperones of the Hsp100, Hsp70, and Hsp40 classes. Specifically, four Hsp40s (also called J‐proteins) have been implicated in various aspects of yeast prion biology: Sis1, Ydj1, Apj1, and Swa2. We found that overexpression of Sis1 or Apj1 accelerates strong [PSI+] elimination by Hsp104 overexpression, yet Ydj1 overexpression has a profound and opposing effect, completely blocking Hsp104‐mediated curing, indicating that Apj1 and Sis1 likely have similar and partially overlapping roles in this process. Interestingly results for weak variants of [PSI+] indicated potentially no role for J‐proteins in curing as no J‐protein alteration whatsoever affected the ability of Hsp104 to cure these variants. Additional experiments to determine the specific J‐protein domains responsible for various effects, as well as J‐protein requirements in cell backgrounds harboring both [PSI+] and [RNQ+] are underway. Overall our data support the hypothesis that Hsp104‐mediated curing may occur by biochemically distinct, variant‐specific mechanisms, only some of which involve J‐proteins.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R15GM110606. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.