SummaryThe amyloid‐based prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are heritable aggregates of misfolded proteins, passed to daughter cells following fragmentation by molecular chaperones including the J‐protein Sis1, Hsp70 and Hsp104. Overexpression of Hsp104 efficiently cures cell populations of the prion [PSI +] by an alternative Sis1‐dependent mechanism that is currently the subject of significant debate. Here, we broadly investigate the role of J‐proteins in this process by determining the impact of amyloid polymorphisms (prion variants) on the ability of well‐studied Sis1 constructs to compensate for Sis1 and ask whether any other S. cerevisiae cytosolic J‐proteins are also required for this process. Our comprehensive screen, examining all 13 members of the yeast cytosolic/nuclear J‐protein complement, uncovered significant variant‐dependent genetic evidence for a role of Apj1 (antiprion DnaJ) in this process. For strong, but not weak [PSI +] variants, depletion of Apj1 inhibits Hsp104‐mediated curing. Overexpression of either Apj1 or Sis1 enhances curing, while overexpression of Ydj1 completely blocks it. We also demonstrated that Sis1 was the only J‐protein necessary for the propagation of at least two weak [PSI +] variants and no J‐protein alteration, or even combination of alterations, affected the curing of weak [PSI +] variants, suggesting the possibility of biochemically distinct, variant‐specific Hsp104‐mediated curing mechanisms.

In eukaryotes, an Hsp70 molecular chaperone triad assists folding of nascent chains emerging from the ribosome tunnel. In fungi, the triad consists of canonical Hsp70 Ssb, atypical Hsp70 Ssz1 and J-domain protein cochaperone Zuo1. Zuo1 binds the ribosome at the tunnel exit. Zuo1 also binds Ssz1, tethering it to the ribosome, while its J-domain stimulates Ssb’s ATPase activity to drive efficient nascent chain interaction. But the function of Ssz1 and how Ssb engages at the ribosome are not well understood. Employing in vivo site-specific crosslinking, we found that Ssb(ATP) heterodimerizes with Ssz1. Ssb, in a manner consistent with the ADP conformation, also crosslinks to ribosomal proteins across the tunnel exit from Zuo1. These two modes of Hsp70 Ssb interaction at the ribosome suggest a functionally efficient interaction pathway: first, Ssb(ATP) with Ssz1, allowing optimal J-domain and nascent chain engagement; then, after ATP hydrolysis, Ssb(ADP) directly with the ribosome.

While population level analyses reveal significant roles for CTCF and cohesin in mammalian genome organization, their contribution to chromatin structure and gene regulation at the single-cell level remain incompletely understood. Here, we use chromosome tracing microscopy to measure the effects of removal of CTCF or cohesin on genome folding across genomic scales. We find cohesin contracts the chromosome into loops, facilitating contacts both within and between Topologically Associating Domains (TADs), while increasing the separation along the chromosome arms through steric effects of loop stacking. CTCF organizes these loops radially, favoring interactions among CTCF-marked borders, including 3-way interactions that bridge TAD boundaries in developmentally important domains. Border-distal regions spread out radially from this axis, helping explain CTCF's previously described role in TAD separation. Together our data provide a structural understanding of how cohesin and CTCF reduce stochasticity in 3D folding across genomic scales and help minimize variability in gene expression.