Our findings suggest that methylphenidate may be associated with a number of serious adverse events as well as a large number of non-serious adverse events in children and adolescents, which often lead to withdrawal of methylphenidate. Our certainty in the evidence is very low, and accordingly, it is not possible to accurately estimate the actual risk of adverse events. It might be higher than reported here.Given the possible association between methylphenidate and the adverse events identified, it may be important to identify people who are most susceptible to adverse events. To do this we must undertake large-scale, high-quality RCTs, along with studies aimed at identifying responders and non-responders.

Systematic perioperative oral hygiene reduces postoperative nosocomial, lower respiratory tract infections and surgical site infections but not urinary tract infections. The effect is statistically, clinically and practically significant.Perioperative decontamination of the nasopharynx and/or oropharynx is a strategy worth pursuing. The intervention is cheap and can easily be carried out by the patients themselves. (Grade A)Studies testing decontamination of the nasopharynx and/or oropharynx have until now only included patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures. As the interventions are cheap, easy to carry out and have a great impact on the patients' outcome, it is recommendable to carry out more studies involving other type of patients undergoing major surgery with a high prevalence of nosocomial infections, respiratory tract infections and surgical site infections.

Systematic reviews are carried out to provide an answer to a clinical question based on all available evidence (published and unpublished), to critically appraise the quality of studies, and account for and explain variations between the results of studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute specializes in providing methodological guidance for the conduct of systematic reviews and has developed methods and guidance for reviewers conducting systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy. Diagnostic tests are used to identify the presence or absence of a condition for the purpose of developing an appropriate treatment plan. Owing to demands for improvements in speed, cost, ease of performance, patient safety, and accuracy, new diagnostic tests are continuously developed, and there are often several tests available for the diagnosis of a particular condition. In order to provide the evidence necessary for clinicians and other healthcare professionals to make informed decisions regarding the optimum test to use, primary studies need to be carried out on the accuracy of diagnostic tests and the results of these studies synthesized through systematic review. The Joanna Briggs Institute and its international collaboration have updated, revised, and developed new guidance for systematic reviews, including systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. This methodological article summarizes that guidance and provides detailed advice on the effective conduct of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

No abstract

No abstract