Immunogenicity following inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination among solid organ transplant recipients has not been assessed. Seventy‐five patients (37 kidney transplant [KT] recipients and 38 healthy controls) received two doses, at 4‐week intervals, of an inactivated whole‐virus SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine. SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific humoral (HMI) and cell‐mediated immunity (CMI) were measured before, 4 weeks post‐first dose, and 2 weeks post‐second dose. The median (IQR) age of KT recipients was 50 (42–54) years and 89% were receiving calcineurin inhibitors/mycophenolate/corticosteroid regimens. The median (IQR) time since transplant was 4.5 (2–9.5) years. Among 35 KT patients, the median (IQR) of anti‐RBD IgG level measured by CLIA after vaccination was not different from baseline, but was significantly lower than in controls (2.4 [1.1–3.7] vs. 1742.0 [747.7–3783.0] AU/ml,
p
< .01) as well as percentages of neutralizing antibody inhibition measured by surrogate viral neutralization test (0 [0–0] vs. 71.2 [56.8–92.2]%,
p
< .01). However, the median (IQR) of SARS‐CoV‐2 mixed peptides‐specific T cell responses measured by ELISpot was significantly increased compared with baseline (30 [4–120] vs. 12 [0–56] T cells/10
6
PBMCs,
p
= .02) and not different from the controls. Our findings revealed weak HMI but comparable CMI responses in fully vaccinated KT recipients receiving inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination compared to immunocompetent individuals (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210226002).
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Vascular calcification (VC) is common among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The severity of VC is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Risk factors for VC include traditional cardiovascular risk factors as well as CKD-related risk factors such as increased calcium and phosphate load. VC is observed in arteries of all sizes from small arterioles to aorta, both in the intima and the media of arterial wall. Several imaging techniques have been utilized in the evaluation of the extent and the severity of VC. Plain radiographs are simple and readily available but with the limitation of decreased sensitivity and subjective and semi-quantitative quantification methods. Mammography, especially useful among women, offers a unique way to study breast arterial calcification, which is largely a medial-type calcification. Ultrasonography is suitable for calcification in superficial arteries. Analyses of wall thickness and lumen size are also possible. Computed tomography (CT) scan, the gold standard, is the most sensitive technique for evaluation of VC. CT scan of coronary artery calcification is not only useful for cardiovascular risk stratification but also offers an accurate and an objective analysis of the severity and progression.
Vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus produces suboptimal immune responses among kidney transplant (KT), peritoneal dialyzed (PD), and hemodialyzed (HD) patients. Participants were vaccinated with two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (V2) and a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (V3) at 1–2 months after V2. We enrolled 106 participants: 31 KT, 28 PD, and 31 HD patients and 16 controls. Among KT, PD, and HD groups, median (IQR) of anti-receptor binding domain antibody levels were 1.0 (0.4–26.8), 1092.5 (606.9–1927.2), and 1740.9 (1106–3762.3) BAU/mL, and percent neutralization was 0.9 (0–9.9), 98.8 (95.9–99.5), and 99.4 (98.8–99.7), respectively, at two weeks after V3. Both parameters were significantly increased from V2 across all groups (p < 0.05). Seroconversion and neutralization positivity rates in PD, HD, and control groups were 100% but were impaired in KT patients (39% and 16%, respectively). S1-specific T-cell counts were increased in PD and HD groups (p < 0.05) but not in KT patients. The positive S1-specific T-cell responder rate was > 90% in PD, HD, and control groups, which was higher than that in KT recipients (74%, p < 0.05). The heterologous inactivated virus/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination strategy elicited greater immunogenicity among dialysis patients; however, inadequate responses remained among KT recipients (TCTR20210226002).
Introduction: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at risk of severe coronavirus disease and mortality. Immunogenicity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) inactivated whole-virus vaccine in patients with ESKD has never been explored.
BackgroundKidney transplant (KT) recipients in dengue‐endemic areas are at risk of exposure. We investigated the epidemiology and outcomes from dengue in KT recipients at our transplant center and conducted a literature review.Materials and methodsWe conducted a 20‐year retrospective study of KT recipients who were diagnosed with laboratory‐confirmed dengue from January 1997 to September 2017 according to the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We analyzed clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.ResultsThere were 13 (0.7%) dengue cases among 1917 KT recipients with a median age of 39 years (interquartile ranges [IQR], 22‐46); 54% were males. Cases occurred with a median onset of 24 months (IQR, 6‐122) after KT. Dengue was diagnosed via dengue NS1 antigen (85%), IgM antibodies (38.5%), or RT‐PCR (15.4%). Patients were classified as having dengue without warning sign (30.8%), with warning sign (53.8%), or severe dengue (15.4%). All patients resolved without complications, except one had hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Ten (76.9%) patients experienced eGFR reduction with a median of 13.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 8.3‐20.5); eight (80%) had a full allograft function recovery.ConclusionsDengue in KT recipients in endemic areas is uncommon. Although a transient decline in allograft function can occur, the overall clinical and allograft outcomes seem to be favorable.
Background. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is less common blood disorder; the causes and the treatments of PRCA are varied. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study during January 2010–December 2017, to explore the etiologies and to evaluate the response and treatment burden in adult patients with PRCA. Results. Of 32 PRCA patients, median age was 57 years (18–90 years). Median hemoglobin level and reticulocyte count at the time of diagnosis were 5.6 g/dL (3.3–7.3 g/dL) and 0.3% (0.1–0.7%), respectively. Median time to hematologic recovery was 12 weeks (3–72 weeks), and median number of red blood cell transfusion (RBC) was 20 units (4–100 units). Causes of PRCA were erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) (47%), parvovirus B19 infection (19%), thymoma (13%), zidovudine (6%), primary autoimmune PRCA (6%), Kaposi’s sarcoma (3%), systemic lupus erythematosus (3%), and ABO-mismatched stem cell transplantation (3%). Only 9 out of 24 treated patients achieved hematologic response within 8 weeks of treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy provided 100% response rate in patients with parvovirus B19-associated PRCA and primary autoimmune PRCA. Low response rate was found in patients receiving immunosuppressants and chemotherapy for the treatment of ESA and thymoma-associated PRCA, respectively. Conclusions. Treatment outcome of PRCA depended upon the causes and the types of treatment, and the burden of RBC transfusion was very high in patients with ESA and thymoma-associated PRCA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.