Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of kidney disease in patients starting renal replacement therapy and affects ϳ40% of type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. It increases the risk of death, mainly from cardiovascular causes, and is defined by increased urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in the absence of other renal diseases. Diabetic nephropathy is categorized into stages: microalbuminuria (UAE Ͼ20 g/min and Յ199 g/min) and macroalbuminuria (UAE Ն200 g/min). Hyperglycemia, increased blood pressure levels, and genetic predisposition are the main risk factors for the development of diabetic nephropathy. Elevated serum lipids, smoking habits, and the amount and origin of dietary protein also seem to play a role as risk factors. Screening for microalbuminuria should be performed yearly, starting 5 years after diagnosis in type 1 diabetes or earlier in the presence of puberty or poor metabolic control. In patients with type 2 diabetes, screening should be performed at diagnosis and yearly thereafter. Patients with micro-and macroalbuminuria should undergo an evaluation regarding the presence of comorbid associations, especially retinopathy and macrovascular disease. Achieving the best metabolic control (A1c Ͻ7%), treating hypertension (Ͻ130/80 mmHg or Ͻ125/75 mmHg if proteinuria Ͼ1.0 g/24 h and increased serum creatinine), using drugs with blockade effect on the reninangiotensin-aldosterone system, and treating dyslipidemia (LDL cholesterol Ͻ100 mg/dl) are effective strategies for preventing the development of microalbuminuria, in delaying the progression to more advanced stages of nephropathy and in reducing cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:176 -188, 2005DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY -Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease in patients starting renal replacement therapy (1) and is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (2). Diabetic nephropathy has been classically defined by the presence of proteinuria Ͼ0.5 g/24 h. This stage has been referred to as overt nephropathy, clinical nephropathy, proteinuria, or macroalbuminuria. In the early 1980s, seminal studies from Europe revealed that small amounts of albumin in the urine, not usually detected by conventional methods, were predictive of the later development of proteinuria in type 1 (3-5) and type 2 (6) diabetic patients. This stage of renal involvement was termed microalbuminuria or incipient nephropathy.The cumulative incidence of microalbuminuria in patients with type 1 diabetes was 12.6% over 7.3 years according to the European Diabetes (EURODIAB) Prospective Complications Study Group (7) and ϳ33% in an 18-year follow-up study in Denmark (8). In patients with type 2 diabetes, the incidence of microalbuminuria was 2.0% per year and the prevalence 10 years after diagnosis 25% in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) (9). Proteinuria occurs in 15-40% of patients with type 1 diabetes, with a peak incidence around 15-20 years of diabetes (8,10,11). In patients with t...

RESUMODiabetes e alterações da tolerância à glicose são freqüentes na população adulta e estão associados a um aumento da mortalidade por doença cardiovascular e complicações microvasculares. O diagnóstico destas situações deve ser feito precocemente, utilizando métodos sensíveis e acurados, já que mudanças no estilo de vida e a correção da hiperglicemia podem retardar o aparecimento do diabetes ou de suas complicações. O teste oral de tolerância à glicose é o método de referência, considerando-se a presença de diabetes ou tolerância à glicose diminuída quando a glicose plasmática de 2h após a ingestão de 75g de glicose for ≥ 200mg/dl ou ≥ 140 e <200mg/dl, respectivamente. Quando este teste não puder ser realizado, utiliza-se a medida da glicose plasmática em jejum, considerando-se como diabetes ou glicose alterada em jejum quando os valores forem ≥ 126mg/dl ou ≥ 110 e <126mg/dl, respectivamente. A medida da glico-hemoglobina não deve ser utilizada para o diagnóstico, mas é o método de referência para avaliar o grau de controle glicêmico a longo prazo. A classificação etiológica proposta atualmente para o diabetes melito inclui 4 categorias: diabetes melito tipo 1, diabetes melito tipo 2, outros tipos específicos de diabetes e diabetes gestacional. A classificação do paciente é usualmente feita em bases clínicas, mas a medida de auto-anticorpos e do peptídeo C pode ser útil em alguns casos. ABSTRACT Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis, Classification and Glucose Control Evaluation.Diabetes mellitus and other categories of impaired glucose tolerance are frequent in the adult population and are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and microvascular complications. The diagnosis of these entities should be performed early and using sensitive and accurate methods, since lifestyle changes and correction of hyperglycemia may delay the incidence of diabetes and its complications. Glucose tolerance test is the reference method and the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance are established when the 2h plasma glucose after an oral intake of 75g of glucose is ≥ 200mg/dl or ≥ 140 and <200mg/dl, respectively. When it is not possible to perform this test, fasting plasma glucose levels ≥ 126mg/dl or ≥ 110 and <126mg/dl, respectively, are used to establish the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired fasting plasma glucose. Glycohemoglobin should not be used for the diagnosis but it is the reference method for evaluation of the long-term glucose control. The etiological classification of diabetes mellitus includes 4 categories: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, other specific types of diabetes and gestational diabetes. The assignment of the patient in each category usually is made on clinical grounds, however in some case the measurement of C-peptide and autoantibodies are necessary.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetic patients with GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a cross-sectional study including 105 type 2 diabetic patients. GFR was measured by 51Cr-EDTA method and estimated by the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. Serum creatinine was measured by the traceable Jaffe method. Bland-Altman plots were used. Bias, accuracy (P30), and precision were evaluated.RESULTSThe mean age of patients was 57 ± 8 years; 53 (50%) were men and 90 (86%) were white. Forty-six (44%) patients had microalbuminuria, and 14 (13%) had macroalbuminuria. 51Cr-EDTA GFR was 103 ± 23, CKD-EPI GFR was 83 ± 15, and MDRD-GFR was 78 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). Accuracy (95% CI) was 67% (58–74) for CKD-EPI and 64% (56–75) for MDRD. Precision was 21 and 22, respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe CKD-EPI and MDRD equations pronouncedly underestimated GFR in type 2 diabetic patients.

Research into the extra-skeletal functions of vitamin D has been expanding in recent years. During pregnancy, maternal vitamin D status may be of concern because of the key role of this vitamin in fetal skeletal development and due to the association between hypovitaminosis D and adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. Therefore, the objective of this manuscript was to review the maternal-fetal impact of gestational vitamin D deficiency and the benefits of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase employing the following keywords: vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and hypovitaminosis D. All relevant articles in English language published since 1980 were analysed by the two authors. Neonatal complications derived from vitamin D deficiency include low birth weight, growth restriction, and respiratory tract infection. In the mother, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with altered glucose homeostasis and increased incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, and bacterial vaginosis. However, the current state of the evidence is controversial for some other endpoints and the actual benefit of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy remains unclear. Additional longitudinal studies may clarify the actual impact of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy, and randomised trials are required to define the benefits of vitamin D supplementation in reducing the incidence of adverse outcomes in the mother and infant.

The CKD-EPI equation is less accurate in patients with Type 2 diabetes when compared with healthy individuals, with a 2.5-fold greater bias.

No abstract

AimsGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent and potentially serious condition which may put both mothers and neonates at risk. The current recommendation for diagnosis is the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study aimed to determine the usefulness of HbA1c test as a diagnostic tool for GDM as compared to the traditional criteria based on the OGTT.MethodsThis was a diagnostic test accuracy study. We performed OGTT and HbA1c test in women attending prenatal visits at a tertiary hospital. GDM was defined according to WHO1999 or ADA/WHO 2013 criteria. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HbA1c. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for different HbA1c cut-off points were calculated.ResultsOf the 262 women in the third trimester of gestation enrolled in the study, 86 (33%) were diagnosed with GDM. Only five of these women presented HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%). This cut-off point presented 100% specificity but very low sensitivity (7%). Based on ROC curve, and considering OGTT as the reference criterion, HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%) showed adequate specificity in diagnosing GDM (94.9%) but low sensitivity (26.4%). Unlike, HbA1c values of 31 mmol/mol (5.0%) presented adequate sensitivity (89.7%) but low specificity (32.6%) to detect GDM. For women with HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%), the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.14 (95%CI 2.49–10.63) and 0.78 (0.68–0.88), respectively. The post-test probability of GDM was about 40%, representing a 4.0-fold increase in the mean pre-test probability. This cut-off point could eliminate the need for the unpleasant and laborious OGTT tests in almost one third of cases, as 38% of patients with GDM may be diagnosable by HbA1c test alone.ConclusionsOur results show that combined HbA1c and OGTT measurements may be useful in diagnosing GDM.

The GFR of normoalbuminuric NIDDM patients declines significantly over 60 months. This decline is associated to baseline GFR and age. HF NIDDM patients show a faster decline in GFR than NF patients, whose GFR falls at a rate that is compatible with the age-related change observed in normal control subjects. The development of microalbuminuria is related to higher baseline AER and to increases in urinary urea and is similar in NF (4 of 19) and HF (3 of 13) NIDDM patients (P > 0.05).