RESUMODiabetes e alterações da tolerância à glicose são freqüentes na população adulta e estão associados a um aumento da mortalidade por doença cardiovascular e complicações microvasculares. O diagnóstico destas situações deve ser feito precocemente, utilizando métodos sensíveis e acurados, já que mudanças no estilo de vida e a correção da hiperglicemia podem retardar o aparecimento do diabetes ou de suas complicações. O teste oral de tolerância à glicose é o método de referência, considerando-se a presença de diabetes ou tolerância à glicose diminuída quando a glicose plasmática de 2h após a ingestão de 75g de glicose for ≥ 200mg/dl ou ≥ 140 e <200mg/dl, respectivamente. Quando este teste não puder ser realizado, utiliza-se a medida da glicose plasmática em jejum, considerando-se como diabetes ou glicose alterada em jejum quando os valores forem ≥ 126mg/dl ou ≥ 110 e <126mg/dl, respectivamente. A medida da glico-hemoglobina não deve ser utilizada para o diagnóstico, mas é o método de referência para avaliar o grau de controle glicêmico a longo prazo. A classificação etiológica proposta atualmente para o diabetes melito inclui 4 categorias: diabetes melito tipo 1, diabetes melito tipo 2, outros tipos específicos de diabetes e diabetes gestacional. A classificação do paciente é usualmente feita em bases clínicas, mas a medida de auto-anticorpos e do peptídeo C pode ser útil em alguns casos. ABSTRACT Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis, Classification and Glucose Control Evaluation.Diabetes mellitus and other categories of impaired glucose tolerance are frequent in the adult population and are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and microvascular complications. The diagnosis of these entities should be performed early and using sensitive and accurate methods, since lifestyle changes and correction of hyperglycemia may delay the incidence of diabetes and its complications. Glucose tolerance test is the reference method and the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance are established when the 2h plasma glucose after an oral intake of 75g of glucose is ≥ 200mg/dl or ≥ 140 and <200mg/dl, respectively. When it is not possible to perform this test, fasting plasma glucose levels ≥ 126mg/dl or ≥ 110 and <126mg/dl, respectively, are used to establish the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired fasting plasma glucose. Glycohemoglobin should not be used for the diagnosis but it is the reference method for evaluation of the long-term glucose control. The etiological classification of diabetes mellitus includes 4 categories: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, other specific types of diabetes and gestational diabetes. The assignment of the patient in each category usually is made on clinical grounds, however in some case the measurement of C-peptide and autoantibodies are necessary.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and metabolic disease that presents a high global incidence. Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is the reference test for long-term glucose monitoring, and it exhibits an association with diabetic chronic complications. However, A1C is not recommended in clinical situations which may interfere with the metabolism of hemoglobin, such as in hemolytic, secondary or iron deficiency anemia, hemoglobinopathies, pregnancy, and uremia. The glycated albumin (GA) is a test that reflects short-term glycemia and is not influenced by situations that falsely alter A1C levels. GA is the higher glycated portion of fructosamine. It is measured by a standardized enzymatic methodology, easy and fast to perform. These laboratory characteristics have ensured the highlight of GA in studies from the last decade, as a marker of monitoring and screening for DM, as well as a predictor of long-term outcomes of the disease. The aim of this review was to discuss the physiological and biochemistry characteristics of the GA, as well as its clinical utility in DM. Arch Endocrinol Metab.2017;61(3):296-304.

Aims/HypothesisDisparities in HbA1c levels have been observed among ethnic groups. Most studies were performed in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), which may interfere with results due to the high variability of glucose levels. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without DM.MethodsThis is a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to September 2016. Studies published after 1996, performed in adults without DM, reporting HbA1c results measured by certified/standardized methods were included. A random effects model was used and the effect size was presented as weighted HbA1c mean difference (95% CI) between different ethnicities as compared to White ethnicity.ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria, totalling data from 49,238 individuals. There were significant differences between HbA1c levels in Blacks [0.26% (2.8 mmol/mol); 95% CI 0.18 to 0.33 (2.0 to 3.6), p <0.001; I2 = 90%, p <0.001], Asians [0.24% (2.6 mmol/mol); 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33 (1.7 to 3.6), p <0.001; I2 = 80%, p = 0.0006] and Latinos [0.08% (0.9 mmol/mol); IC 95% 0.06 to 0.10 (0.7 to 1.1); p <0.001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.72] when compared to Whites.Conclusions/InterpretationThis meta-analysis shows that, in individuals without DM, HbA1c values are higher in Blacks, Asians, and Latinos when compared to White persons. Although small, these differences might have impact on the use of a sole HbA1c point to diagnose DM in all ethnic populations.

Measurement of UAC in a RUS was the best choice for the diagnosis screening of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients, considering cost and accuracy.

AimsGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent and potentially serious condition which may put both mothers and neonates at risk. The current recommendation for diagnosis is the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study aimed to determine the usefulness of HbA1c test as a diagnostic tool for GDM as compared to the traditional criteria based on the OGTT.MethodsThis was a diagnostic test accuracy study. We performed OGTT and HbA1c test in women attending prenatal visits at a tertiary hospital. GDM was defined according to WHO1999 or ADA/WHO 2013 criteria. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HbA1c. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for different HbA1c cut-off points were calculated.ResultsOf the 262 women in the third trimester of gestation enrolled in the study, 86 (33%) were diagnosed with GDM. Only five of these women presented HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%). This cut-off point presented 100% specificity but very low sensitivity (7%). Based on ROC curve, and considering OGTT as the reference criterion, HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%) showed adequate specificity in diagnosing GDM (94.9%) but low sensitivity (26.4%). Unlike, HbA1c values of 31 mmol/mol (5.0%) presented adequate sensitivity (89.7%) but low specificity (32.6%) to detect GDM. For women with HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%), the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.14 (95%CI 2.49–10.63) and 0.78 (0.68–0.88), respectively. The post-test probability of GDM was about 40%, representing a 4.0-fold increase in the mean pre-test probability. This cut-off point could eliminate the need for the unpleasant and laborious OGTT tests in almost one third of cases, as 38% of patients with GDM may be diagnosable by HbA1c test alone.ConclusionsOur results show that combined HbA1c and OGTT measurements may be useful in diagnosing GDM.

No abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as the presence of kidney damage or a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for three or more months. Measurement of serum creatinine is the most commonly used method to evaluated kidney function, but it must be included in formulas to estimate GFR, adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity, such as the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation. The performance of this equation is acceptable for patients with CKD but appears to under-estimate GFR in populations with unknown kidney status. A new formula has been developed recently. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation appears to perform better than the MDRD equation. Cystatin C has been widely evaluated as a marker for GFR and seems to be more sensitive than creatinine. The aim of this review is to discuss the recommendations for detecting CKD, emphasizing the characteristics and limitations of GFR estimating equations and pitfalls in the evaluation of urinary albumin excretion.

No abstract