Textural, melting, and sensory characteristics of reduced-fat Cheddar cheeses made with exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing and nonproducing cultures were monitored during ripening. Hardness, gumminess, springiness, and chewiness significantly increased in the cheeses as fat content decreased. Cheese made with EPS-producing cultures was the least affected by fat reduction. No differences in hardness, springiness, and chewiness were found between young reduced fat cheese made with a ropy Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris [JFR1; the culture that produced reduced-fat cheese with moisture in the nonfat substance (MNFS) similar to that in its full-fat counterpart] and its full-fat counterpart. Whereas hardness of full-fat cheese and reduced-fat cheese made with JFR1 increased during ripening, a significant decrease in its value was observed in all other cheeses. After 6 mo of ripening, reduced fat cheeses made with all EPS-producing cultures maintained lower values of all texture profile analysis parameters than did those made with no EPS. Fat reduction decreased cheese meltability. However, no differences in meltability were found between the young full-fat cheese and the reduced-fat cheese made with the ropy culture JFR1. Both the aged full- and reduced-fat cheeses made with JFR1 had similar melting patterns. When heated, they both became soft and creamy without losing shape, whereas reduced-fat cheese made with no EPS ran and separated into greasy solids and liquid. No differences were detected by panelists between the textures of the full-fat cheese and reduced-fat cheese made with JFR1, both of which were less rubbery or firm, curdy, and crumbly than all other reduced-fat cheeses.
Proteolysis during ripening of reduced fat Cheddar cheeses made with different exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing and nonproducing cultures was studied. A ropy strain of Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris (JFR1) and capsule-forming nonropy and moderately ropy strains of Streptococcus thermophilus were used in making reduced-fat Cheddar cheese. Commercial Cheddar starter was used in making full-fat cheese. Results showed that the actual yield of cheese made with JFR1 was higher than that of all other reduced-fat cheeses. Cheese made with JFR1 contained higher moisture, moisture in the nonfat substance, and residual coagulant activity than all other reduced-fat cheeses. Proteolysis, as determined by PAGE and the level of water-soluble nitrogen, was also higher in cheese made with JFR1 than in all other cheeses. The HPLC analysis showed a significant increase in hydrophobic peptides (causing bitterness) during storage of cheese made with JFR1. Cheese made with the capsule-forming nonropy adjunct of S. thermophilus, which contained lower moisture and moisture in the nonfat substance levels and lower chymosin activity than did cheese made with JFR1, accumulated less hydrophobic peptides. In conclusion, some EPS-producing cultures produced reduced-fat Cheddar cheese with moisture in the nonfat substance similar to that in its full-fat counterpart without the need for modifying the standard cheese-making protocol. Such cultures might accumulate hydrophobic (bitter) peptides if they do not contain the system able to hydrolyze them. For making high quality reduced-fat Cheddar cheese, EPS-producing cultures should be used in conjunction with debittering strains.
Camel milk produces watery texture when it is processed to yogurt. Despite the extensive studies on microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) in dairy research, the effect of this enzyme on the properties of yogurt made from camel milk has not been studied. This study aims to investigate the impact of MTGase with and without bovine skimmed milk powder (SMP), whey protein concentrate (WPC),or b-lactoglobulin (b-lg) on physico-chemical, rheological, microstructural, and sensory properties of camel-milk yogurt during 15 days of storage period. MTGase treatment markedly reduced the fermentation time of unfortified and SMP-fortified camel milk. The fortification of camel milk without MTGase failed to give settype yogurt. The treatment of unfortified milk with MTGase enormously improved the viscosity and the body of yogurt samples. Fortification of MTGase-treated milk impacted positively on the viscosity, the water holding capacity, and the density of the protein matrix in the gel microstructure, which were influenced by the type of dairy ingredients. All MTGase-treated yogurts differed from each other in hardness and adhesiveness values. Electrophoresis results showed that the susceptibility of the individual milk proteins to MTGase varied, and there were differences among the treatments toward the enzyme. SMP-fortified yogurt was the most accepted product. Generally, the addition of MTGase preparation at a concentration of 0.4%, simultaneously with starter culture, to fortified camel milk was considered an effective tool to solve the challenges of producing set-type yogurt from this milk.
We investigated the effects of milk protein concentrate (MPC) and milk protein concentrate hydrolysate (MPCH) as antioxidant agents in rats. Six groups of healthy (non-diabetic) and type-II diabetic rats were used: (1) healthy rats (control), (2) alloxan-induced rats (diabetic control group), (3) healthy rats treated orally with MPC, (4) diabetic rats treated orally with MPC, (5) healthy rats treated orally with MPCH, and (6) diabetic rats treated orally with MPCH. We concluded that treatment with MPC or MPCH reduced the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in healthy and diabetic rats. Treatment with MPC or MPCH improved activities of antioxidant enzymes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, reduced glutathione, glutathione-S-transferase, and glutathione peroxidase) in healthy and diabetic rats. From the present data, we concluded that both MPC and MPCH contain potent antioxidants and could improve the health of rats or other animals with diabetes mellitus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.