AIM:To demonstrate the therapeutic effect of probiotics in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and their effect on inflammatory mediators and nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation in these patients. METHODS:Thirty patients with mild to moderate UC were randomly classified into two groups: sulfasalazine group, who received sulfasalazine 2400 mg/d; and probiotic group, who received sulfasalazine 2400 mg/d with probiotic. The patients were investigated before and after 8 wk of treatment with probiotic (Lactobacillus delbruekii and Lactobacillus fermentum ). Colonic activity of myeloperoxidase (MPO) was assayed with UV spectrophotometry, the colonic content of interleukin (IL)-6 was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), fecal calprotectin was determined by ELISA, and expression of NF-κB p65 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α proteins in colonic tissue was identified by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, respectively. RESULTS:At the start of the study, colonic mucosal injury and inflammation were demonstrated in UC patients by hematoxylin and eosin staining, and an increase in colonic MPO activity, fecal calprotectin, and expression of colonic TNF-α and NF-κB p65 proteins. The use of probiotic for 8 wk significantly ameliorated the inflammation by decreasing the colonic concentration of IL-6, expression of TNF-α and NF-κB p65, leukocyte recruitment, as demonstrated by a decrease in colonic MPO activity, and the level of fecal calprotectin compared to sulfasalazine group and the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Oral supplementation with probiotics could be helpful in maintaining remission and preventing relapse of UC.

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic bone disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several studies have documented that metformin is osteogenic in vitro. In contrast, others showed no effect of metformin on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Incretin hormones have received much attention because of their beneficial effects beyond glycemia, including on bone health. The study evaluated the anti-osteoporotic effect of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women. Forty postmenopausal diabetic women were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 received metformin (Glucophage(®) 500 mg) 1 tablet twice daily, and group 2 received sitagliptin (Januvia(®) 100 mg) 1 tablet/day, for 12 weeks. Fasting blood and urine samples were collected for measurement of serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD). Laboratory tests were measured at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks, and at the end of the study. Bone mineral density of the anterior posterior lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 weeks of the intervention. In the metformin-treated group, the mean values for all markers of bone turnover at 12 weeks of treatment were not significantly different from baseline. In group 2, the mean serum total ALP was significantly decreased, serum osteocalcin levels were non-significantly decreased gradually by 10% at 12 weeks, while urinary DPD decreased significantly and was then maintained at 28% decrease at 12 weeks. In conclusion, metformin is neither osteogenic nor has anti-osteoporotic effect, while sitagliptin could positively regulate bone metabolism.

Aloe vera L. high molecular weight fractions (AHM) containing less than 10 ppm of barbaloin and polysaccharide (MW: 1000 kDa) with glycoprotein, verectin (MW: 29 kDa), were prepared by patented hyper-dry system in combination of freeze-dry technique with microwave and far infrared radiation. AHM produced significant decrease in blood glucose level sustained for 6 weeks of the start of the study. Significant decrease in triglycerides was only observed 4 weeks after treatment and continued thereafter. No deterious effects on kidney and liver functions were apparent. Treatment of diabetic patients with AHM may relief vascular complications probably via activation of immunosystem.

No abstract

This study aimed at comparing the effects of atorvastatin and vitamin E on erectile dysfunction in patients initially irresponsive to sildenafil, with investigation into the underlying possible mechanisms. Sixty patients were randomly divided into three groups: the atorvastatin group received 80 mg daily, the vitamin E group received 400 IU daily and the control group received placebo capsules. Patients were examined both before and after 6 weeks of treatment for biochemical tests; Superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPO), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), nitric oxide (NO) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and for erectile function tests; International index of erectile function (IIEF-5) scores and Rigiscan. Both atorvastatin and vitamin E showed a statistically significant GPO increase (P<0.05) and a statistically significant IL-6 decrease (P<0.05). Only atorvastatin showed a statistically significant increase in NO (15.19%, P<0.05), eNOS (20.58%, P<0.01), IIEF-5 score (53.1%, P<0.001) and Rigiscan rigidity parameters (P<0.01), in addition to a statistically significant decrease in CRP (57.9%, P<0.01). However, SOD showed a statistically significant increase only after vitamin E intake (23.1%, P<0.05). Both atorvatstain and vitamin E had antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Although activating eNOS by atorvastatin was the real difference, and expected to be the main mechanism for NO increase and for improving erectile dysfunction. Atorvastatin, but not vitamin E, is a promising drug for sildenafil nonresponders.