Background: Marginal tissue recession is a frequent clinical scenario that creates substantial compromise in esthetic appearance of the patient. The current randomized, double-blind interventional trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of “platelet rich fibrin (PRF)” membrane with bioresorbable guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane as compared to GTR membrane alone utilizing “double lateral sliding bridge flap (DLSBF) technique” for the management of simultaneous GR defects in human subjects. Materials and Methods: Twenty subjects were randomly allotted in two groups: Group 1 (test): 10 subjects treated with PRF + GTR membrane using DLSBF technique and Group 2 (control): 10 subjects treated with GTR membrane alone using DLSBF technique. Clinical measurements such as relative gingival marginal level, “relative clinical attachment level (R-CAL),” “probing pocket depth (PPD),” “gingival recession (GR),” and “width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) and gingival thickness (GT)” were evaluated at the initiation of the study and 6 months thereafter. Results: Two groups showed statistically significant differences with respect to probing depth reduction, CAL gain, and increase in WKG and GT. No significant result was observed with mean root coverage (RC) and complete RC for test (84.80% ± 19.53% and 54.99% ± 38.53%) and control group (75.69% ± 18.86% and 35.83% ± 39.29%), respectively. Conclusions: The combination of PRF membrane used along with GTR membrane provides no additional benefits over GTR membrane alone. However, the DLSBF technique convincingly shows simultaneous elimination of multiple problems associated with GR, shallow vestibule, hypersensitivity, and aberrant frenum pull in a single stage with meticulous performance.
Gingival hyperpigmentation is a hereditary feature in populations. Gingival pigmentation not only affects aesthetics but also has a negative psychological effect. For many people, gingival hyperpigmentation is a severe cosmetic problem. Although black gums are not a medical issue, many individuals find them unsightly. The pigmentation of gingiva contributes to the harmony of the smile in a significant way. A periodontal plastic surgery procedure called gingival depigmentation eliminates or reduces hyperpigmentation. Different treatment approaches for gingival depigmentation have been documented, such as scalpel, electrosurgery, diamond burs, chemical methods, cryosurgery, and lasers. According to studies, cryosurgery and lasers are the best procedures since they provide better aesthetic outcomes and low recurrence rates. The coordination of treatment plans and the choice technique are influenced by the patient's skin tone, the degree of gingival pigmentation, the lip line, the upper lip curvature, aesthetic concern, and treatment expectations. This case report, which involves a 23-year-old female patient, provides a comparison between the efficacy of scalpel and laser procedures for treating gingival hyperpigmentation. The patient's left side received diode laser treatment, while the right received scalpel treatment. Scalpel depigmentation caused the treated area to recover without incident. The benefits of laser depigmentation include a bloodless surgical field and recovery without complications. No postoperative pain, bleeding, infection, or scars were seen on the first and consequent visits. The recovery went smoothly. The patient was satisfied with the treatment modality, and the outcomes were outstanding, according to the patient. There was no re-pigmentation throughout the follow-up period. This split-mouth study will provide information regarding soft tissue healing using two different approaches in the same patient.
Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) membrane and Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) membrane using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Approach method for the management of multiple gingival recession (GR) defects in humans. Methodology: 20 subjects with gingival recession will be enrolled. 10 patient will be randomly allotted to test group (PRFM membrane) or control group (PRF membrame). Primary outcome will be gain in root coverage (RC) and secondary outcome will be Plaque index (PI), Papillary bleeding index (PBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), relative attachment level (RAL), relative gingival margin level (RGML), recession depth (RD), gingival thickness (GT) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG). Clinical evaluation will be performed at 3 & 6 months of therapy. Expected Results: When all the parameters will be compared at 6 months post-operatively to baseline data, both the treatment group (test and control) will be expected to show significant gain in RC, RAL gain, PPD reduction, decrease in RD, increase in GT and WKG. PRFM membrane will result in significant gain in RC, RAL gain, PPD reduction, and decrease in reduction depth, increase in GT and WKG at 6 months when compared to PRF membrane. Conclusion: PRFM membrane will be effectual in management of gingival recession. PRFM membrane is expected to have significantly greater outcome as compared to PRF membrane group.
Mouth rinses are therapeutic solutions utilized for gargling and rinsing the oral cavity. Several oral disorders need a mouth rinse, which can differ from halitosis to diseases of the periodontium. It is essential for the management of secondary infections, for example, oral mucositis. A mouth rinse may be suggested as an anti-inflammatory, antibacterial agent, topical analgesic, or for caries prevention. Several different mouth rinses are accessible nowadays. Selection of a suitable mouth rinse depends on the patient's requirement, disease threat and competence, and safety of mouth rinse. The application of antiseptics to the skin or mucous membranes before surgery or injections has been practised for many years. The goal of such an application is to reduce the number of microorganisms on the surface to prevent their entry into underlying tissues, which could cause bacteremia, septicemia, or harmful local infections. A similar idea of minimizing oral bacteria underlies the patient's usage of an antibiotic mouthwash before dental treatments. This decrease in microflora also reduces the possibility of pathogens entering the patient's mouth through direct contact, splatter, or aerosols during dental treatment. The main aim of this review is to aid oral health care professionals in making the correct selection of mouthwash while dealing with different conditions of the oral cavity.
Background: In this evolutionary era of dentistry, newer techniques have evolved for complete coverage of multiple recession defects (MRDs). Since 2012, MRDs have been treated using the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) approach and a variety of regenerating membranes with varying degrees of success. Platelet‑rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) membrane has shown a robust release of growth factors and was known to enhance the healing process. Thus, in this study we have evaluated the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) with that of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane using the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique in Miller Class I and II multiple gingival recession defects. Methods: This randomized, parallel designed, controlled, clinical study was conducted in 20 subjects (10 male and 10 female) having class I/II MGR defects either buccally or labially. The test group was treated with VISTA and PRF membrane while the control group was treated with VISTA and PRFM membrane. The clinical measurements such as plaque index, papillary bleeding index, probing pocket depth, relative attachment level (RAL) and relative gingival marginal level (R-GML), width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), gingival recession (REC) and gingival thickness (GT) were measured at baseline, three and six months. A Student’s paired t-test was utilized to analyse data from the day of surgery to six months. Results: Ten patients in the test group (89.23±15.04) and 10 patients in the control group (85.06±17.71) showed marked root coverage compared to baseline. Conclusions: Both test and control groups showed statistically significant enhancement in root coverage. However, no statistically significant difference was found when a comparison was made between the two groups in terms of PD, relative RAL, R-GML and REC reduction, gain in WKG, and increase in GT. Trial registration: CTRI/2021/07/035240, registered 29 July 2021.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.