Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and approximately 35%-55% of patients with CRC will develop hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Surgical resection represents the only chance of long-term survival. The goal of surgery should be to resect all metastases with negative histological margins while preserving sufficient functional hepatic parenchyma. Although resection remains the only chance of long-term survival, management strategies should be tailored for each case. For patients with extensive metastatic disease who would otherwise be unresectable, the combination of advances in medical therapy, such as systemic chemotherapy (CTX), and the improvement in surgical techniques for metastatic disease, have enhanced prognosis with prolongation of the median survival rate and cure. The use of portal vein embolization and preoperative CTX may also increase the number of patients suitable for surgical treatment. Despite current treatment options, many patients still experience a recurrence after hepatic resection. More active systemic CTX agents are being used increasingly as adjuvant therapy either before or after surgery. Local tumor ablative therapies, such as microwave coagulation therapy and radiofrequency ablation therapy, should be considered as an adjunct to hepatic resection, in which resection cannot deal with all of the tumor lesions. Formulation of an individualized plan, which combines surgery with systemic CTX, is a necessary task of the multidisciplinary team. The aim of this paper is to discuss different approaches for patients that are treated due to CRC liver metastasis.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has commonly been substituted for azathioprine (AZA) in kidney transplantation and has been shown to have a greater effect on T cell function and also B cell function than AZA. Although immunoglobulin deficiency has been investigated in patients treated with protocols that include AZA, it has not extensively been studied in MMF-based immunosuppressive protocols. To evaluate this effect, we conducted a prospective study and recruited 49 patients. The patients received either AZA- (group 1) or MMF- (group 2) based therapy. A total of 17 patients in group 1 and 24 patients in group 2 completed the study. Immunoglobulin levels were evaluated before and in every month after transplantation for a 6-month period. Total infectious episodes were recorded and evaluated after 6 months in both groups. While no significant differences have been found in group 1, there were significant decreases in IgG, M, and A levels in group 2 after 6 months (IgG: 11.6+/-1.5-6.8+/-2.0 g/L, P<0.0001; IgM: 2.20+/-1.40-1.40+/-1.16 g/L, P=0.02; IgA: 1.40+/-0.70-1.07+/-0.86 g/L P=0.03). Two patients (11.7%) in group 1 and 11 patients in group 2 (45.8%) were found to have at least one low level of immunoglobulin (P=0.03). When the infectious complications were evaluated, the mean number of infection episodes in each patient was 1.3+/-1.6 and 0.5+/-0.7 for the MMF and AZA groups, respectively (P=0.06). Recurrent urinary tract infection developed in eight patients and seven of those were in group 2. In group 2, 7 of 11 patients with low immunoglobulin levels had recurrent urinary tract infection (63%), while no patient who had normal immunoglobulin levels developed any recurrent urinary tract infections (P<0.001). After 6 months, MMF was changed to AZA in these seven patients, who had both recurrent urinary tract infections and low immunoglobulin levels. All but one patient was found to have normal immunoglobulin levels after 3 months of conversion and only two episodes of infection were recorded during this period. We suggest that serum immunoglobulin levels can be monitored in patients taking MMF, and conversion from MMF to AZA may be an alternative for patients with low immunoglobulin levels and recurrent urinary tract infections.

Some hepatocytes of sex-mismatched liver grafts were replaced by "recipient-derived cells" during injury. Such repopulation is more common in the early liver-graft biopsies. The severity of acute cellular rejection appears to have no effect on the rate of recipient-derived repopulation.

A relatively low success rate in recurrent incisional hernia repair has prompted us to review the effects of certain risk factors on the long-term outcome of our cases. In this study, 109 recurrent incisional hernias were repaired and reviewed between 7 and 92 months after the operation. The recurrence rate was 45.0%. Many conditions that have been implicated as causal factors in the occurrence of incisional hernias were not found to be associated with recurrence after repair. However, chronic constipation was determined to be the most prominent risk factor associated with late recurrence.

No abstract

No abstract

Based on these results, we suggest that ''recipient-specific bone marrow-derived hepatocyte repopulation'' in liver allograft during tissue injury is a relatively early event.

Standard antituberculous therapy including isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide is widely used for the treatment of active tuberculosis. Its most important side effect is hepatotoxicity, ranging from asymptomatic transaminitis to fulminant hepatic failure. A 19-year-old woman was admitted to our unit due to jaundice and unconsciousness. According to her past medical history, she was diagnosed as having extrapulmonary tuberculosis and had been prescribed standard antituberculous therapy. The patient became icteric and unconscious on the fourth day after therapy initiation. She was diagnosed with drug-induced acute fulminant hepatic failure and underwent living-related liver transplantation. Nonhepatotoxic antituberculous therapy (cycloserine, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and ethambutol) and low-dose immunosuppressive therapy were started after transplantation. Currently the patient is very well with normal graft function 42 months after transplantation. Here we report a case of a patient with acute fulminant hepatic failure caused by isoniazid, rifampicin, or both, who was successfully treated with living-related liver transplantation and a relatively less hepatotoxic antituberculous therapy. In conclusion, liver transplantation is a feasible therapy for individuals with standard antituberculous therapy-induced hepatic failure. Nonhepatotoxic antituberculous therapy may achieve control of active tuberculosis in such individuals after transplantation. Liver abnormalities are the most important adverse effect of standard antituberculous therapy including isoniazid (INH), rifampin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. [1][2][3][4] Such abnormalities range from asymptomatic transaminitis to acute hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure. [1][2][3][4] Liver transplantation has become an effective treatment option for individuals with drug-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Here we report an active extrapulmonary tuberculosis case of a patient with standard antituberculous therapy-induced acute fulminant hepatic failure who was successfully treated with livingrelated liver transplantation and a relatively less-hepatotoxic antituberculous therapy regimen including cycloserine, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and ethambutol. CASE REPORTA 19-year-old woman was admitted to our unit with jaundice and unconsciousness. The only remarkable feature in her past medical history was presentation to her local hospital with the complaints of fever, malaise, weight loss, night sweating, and lower abdominal pain of 4 weeks' duration. Abdominal and gynecological examination revealed a palpable left ovarian mass. Sonography confirmed the diagnosis of left ovarian mass, and Abbreviation: INH, isoniazid.