No abstract

This study set out to compare adhesion reformation after conventional and laparoscopic adhesiolysis using two different laparoscopic dissection techniques. In a first operation, 36 rabbits underwent fixation of 6 cm2 of the cecum with the serosa removed to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed laparoscopically (n = 12) or via laparotomy (n = 12) using sharp and blunt dissection. In a third group (n = 12), laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed using monopolar electrocautery. Outcome was assessed by incidence, extent, and localization of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, all rabbits developed new adhesions relative to 79% after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The extent of reformed adhesions (median) was greater after conventional adhesiolysis than laparoscopic adhesiolysis (2725 mm2 vs 230 mm2, P < 0.001). The latter did not differ significantly from laparoscopic adhesiolysis by electrocautery (310 mm2). There were small adhesions to 3 of 72 trocar wounds, but extensive adhesions to 33% of the abdominal incisions were found in the conventional group. In this standardized experimental setting, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with a significantly reduced reformation of adhesions. Different laparoscopic dissection techniques have no significant influence on the extent of adhesion reformation.

Phospholipids and icodextrin were effective in preventing re-formation of adhesions.

This study aimed to compare new adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. In a first operation, 24 rabbits underwent fixation of deserosated cecum (6 cm2) to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed by laparoscopy (n = 12) or laparotomy (n = 12). Outcome was assessed by the incidence, extent, and location of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, new adhesions developed in all the rabbits, as compared with 75% after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The extent of newly formed adhesions was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) after laparoscopic adhesiolysis (368+/-115 mm2) as compared with conventional adhesiolysis (2434+/-245 mm2). There were no adhesions to trocar wounds, but adhesions to the abdominal incision were found in 33% of the conventional group. In a rabbit model comparing laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in a standardized experimental setting, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with a significantly reduced formation of new postoperative adhesions.

Treatment with the phytopreparation from papaya accelerated wound healing and reduced the severity of local inflammation in rats with burn wounds. The effect of this phytopreparation can be related to an increase in the effectiveness of intracellular bacterial killing by tissue phagocytes due to the inhibition of bacterial catalase. Antioxidant activity of the preparation decreases the risk of oxidative damage to tissues.

In prosthetic hernia repair, the mechanical properties of surgical mesh should correspond with those of the fascia being repaired. A mismatch of mechanical properties may result in implant deformation, abdominal wall biomechanics impairment, and recurrent herniation at the edges of the meshes.

Experimental data suggest that more knowledge is necessary to assess the optimal size, structure, and position of prosthetic materials for mesh hiatoplasty. The indication for mesh implantation in the hiatal region should be carried out very carefully.

Background: Textiles in the form of surgical meshes are widely used in hernia surgery. Their porous structure allows tissue infiltration to incorporate the fabric for complete healing and device stabilization. This study was aimed to reconstitute the esophageal wall and to investigate the functional and histological consequences of a new, non-absorbable polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh and an absorbable polyglactin 910 (Vicryl^®) mesh. Methods: Semicircular esophageal defects of 0.5 × 1 cm were created 2 cm proximal of the cardia in 10 rabbits. This gap was bridged using either polyglactin 910 or PVDF and additionally covered by omental wrapping. The clinical outcome was observed by clinical observation, regular esophagoscopies and X-ray contrast medium examinations. Local tissue regeneration was verified by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Results: After an observation period of 3 months we found no anastomotic strictures, complete mucosal regeneration, minimal inflammation reaction and initial regeneration of the muscle layer for the PVDF group. Within the polyglactin 910 group, three patch failures with consecutive anastomotic leakage occurred. Conclusion: The results indicate that PVDF mesh structure gives the opportunity of local tissue regeneration in the esophagus. Though re-epithelialization and muscle cell ingrowth could be detected for absorbable polyglactin 910 mesh, this implant was accompanied by a high and early rate of anastomotic leakage.