that pemZ"O is about one third of pemr-I. However, if, as has been discussed by Pais and Treiman,20 the soft-pion techniques are valid a t q2--MW2, then we can extract the isovector contribution p,,r-1(q2) directly from ex-~eriments. The Dresence of an isoscalar contribution can easily be incorporated into our results.A sizable branching ratjo makes possible the search for the IVB through its hadronic decay modes. Our estimates imply that about half of the W events will decay into hadrons. The background from inelastic neutrino-nucleon scattering, discussed by Cline, Mann, and Rubbia." is still manageable. because a com~leteWe construct a resonance model of deep-inelastic electron scattering. Using semiempirical rules for the form of the nucleon spectrum and a universality hypothesis for the transition form factors, we obtain explicit expressions for the structure functions W1 and W2 in the Bjorken limit. The ratio of the longitudinal to transverse photoabsorption cross sections vanishes for large momentum transfers, and vWz becomes scale invariant. A one-parameter fit is obtained to VWZ (proton), and a zero-parameter prediction is made of vW2 (proton)-vWz (neutron). There is good agreement between the theory and experiment in the region where scale invariance is well established.' J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 179, 1547 (1969. 2 J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. 185, 1975 (1969). the data is scale i~zvariance, i.e., that the structure func- R, P. Feynman, Phys, Rev, Letters 23, 1415 (1969). tions essentially depend on the ratio v/q2 only, where v S. D. Drell, D. J. Levy, and T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. Letters is the energy loss of the electron, and q2 is the invariant 22, 744 6 J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 981 (1969). momentum transfer squared. 6 H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 1978 (1969).