No abstract

: We report a direct comparison of scaled analogue experiments to test the reproducibility of model results among ten different experimental modelling laboratories. We present results for two experiments: a brittle thrust wedge experiment and a brittleviscous extension experiment. The experimental set-up, the model construction technique, the viscous material and the base and wall properties were prescribed. However, each laboratory used its own frictional analogue material and experimental apparatus. Comparison of results for the shortening experiment highlights large differences in model evolution that may have resulted from (1) differences in boundary conditions (indenter or basal-pull models), (2) differences in model widths, (3) location of observation (for example, sidewall versus centre of model), (4) material properties, (5) base and sidewall frictional properties, and (6) differences in set-up technique of individual experimenters. Six laboratories carried out the shortening experiment with a mobile wall. The overall evolution of their models is broadly similar, with the development of a thrust wedge characterized by forward thrust propagation and by back thrusting. However, significant variations are observed in spacing between thrusts, their dip angles, number of forward thrusts and back thrusts, and surface slopes. The structural evolution of the brittle-viscous extension experiments is similar to a high degree. Faulting initiates in the brittle layers above the viscous layer in

We propose a conceptual model of frontal accretion within bivergent wedges, which is based on two‐dimensional sandbox simulations and the analysis of particle displacement fields. Each frontal accretion cycle consists of a thrust initiation, an underthrusting phase, and a reactivation phase. The location and magnitude of deformation within a bivergent wedge and its associated surface uplift vary systematically with the phase of the frontal accretion cycle and are thus predictable. Therefore the frontal accretion cycle can be considered as an internal clock for wedge‐scaled deformation and surface uplift. We further demonstrate that the geometry of the deformation front and the spatial distribution of surface uplift can be used to infer the currently active phase within a frontal accretion cycle. Surface uplift of the axial zone and the retrowedge may reach up to half of the thickness of the incoming sedimentary layer during a frontal accretion cycle. We estimate cycle duration to range between 104 and 105 years, which is thus similar to the time frame of climatic cycles. The proposed conceptual model provides an explanation for the commonly observed transience of deformation and surface uplift and for the discrepancy between geodetic, paleoseismologic, and geologic estimates of fault slip.

No abstract

No abstract