This study was undertaken to determine the absolute and relative value of blood vessel invasion (BVI) using both factor VIII-related antigen and elastica van Gieson staining, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p53, c- erb B-2, and conventional prognostic factors in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates associated with long-term survival in Japanese patients with node-negative breast cancer. Two hundred patients with histological node-negative breast cancer were studied. We investigated nine clinicopathological factors, including PCNA, p53, c- erb B-2 using permanent-section immunohistochemistry, clinical tumour size (T), histological grade (HG), mitotic index (MI), tumour necrosis (TN), lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) and BVI, followed for a median of 10 years (range 1–20). Twenty-one patients (10.5%) had recurrence and 15 patients (7.5%) died of breast cancer. Univariate analysis showed that BVI, PCNA, T, HG, MI, p53, c- erb B-2 and LVI were significantly predictive of 20-year RFS or OS. Multivariate analysis showed that BVI (P = 0.0159, P = 0.0368), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (P = 0.0165, P = 0.0001), and T (P = 0.0190, P = 0.0399) were significantly independent prognostic factors for RFS or OS respectively. BVI, PCNA and T were independent prognostic indicators for RFS or OS in Japanese patients with node-negative breast cancer and are useful in selecting high-risk patients who may be eligible to receive strong adjuvant therapies. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
To evaluate the clinicopathologic significance of angiogenesis as a prognostic factor and the objective methods for evaluating angiogenesis, we immunohistochemically stained a representative section of breast tumors with factor VIII-related antigen staining. There were 109 patients with primary breast cancer from 1971 to 1979. The two methods of identifying angiogenesis were the average microvessel count per square millimeter (AMC) and the highest microvessel count per square millimeter (HMC). There was no relation between microvessel count (AMC or HMC) or age, menopausal status, clinical tumor size (T), histologic classification, nuclear grade, node status, histologic grade (HG), mitosis index, or lymphatic invasion (LI). There was a relation between microvessel count and blood vessel invasion (BVI) (HMC:p = 0.0007) and tumor necrosis (TN) (HMC:p = 0.0050). Univariate analysis showed that AMC or HMC was a statistically significant predictor of overall survival in all patients (p = 0.0086 and p = 0.0307, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that AMC was an independent predictor of node status when we fitted a model with node status, BVI, and either AMC or HMC; but HMC was not independent. However, when we fitted a model including all 11 of the other indicators and AMC or HMC, the node status, HG, and LI were independent predictors, but AMC and HMC were not. Although AMC was a better method than HMC for evaluating angiogenesis, we cannot confirm angiogenesis as a significant independent prognostic factor associated with long-term survival in Japanese breast cancer patients.
This study was undertaken to assess blood vessel invasion (BVI) and other histologic features to determine the best method of histologic prognosis in node-negative breast cancer patients. The prognostic significance of the clinico-pathological findings was evaluated in 70 patients with node-negative breast cancer among 135 patients operated on between 1971 and 1981. The prognostic factors investigated included BVI, peritumor lymphatic invasion, clinical tumor size, nuclear grade, histological grade, mitotic grade, and tumor necrosis. BVI was detected by factor VIII-related antigen and elastica van Gieson staining. BVI-negative patients had a 20-year cumulative survival of 93.7%, versus 74.7% for BVI-positive patients (P = 0.0294). The clinical tumor size also correlated well with prognosis (P < 0.001). However, the other histologic features did not correlate with a poor prognosis. Moreover, we retrospectively examined the effect of postoperative chemotherapy for patients with BVI and T3, and the prognosis of those given chemotherapy seemed to be better than that of those who were not. Tumors measuring more than 51 mm and BVI may thus represent adverse prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine the absolute and relative value of angiogenesis, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and conventional prognostic factors in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates associated with long-term survival in Japanese patients with node-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with histological node-negative breast cancer were studied. We investigated nine clinicopathological factors, including angiogenesis, PCNA using per-manent-section immunohistochemistry, clinicaltumor size, histological grade (HG), tumor necrosis, lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI), histological extension, histological classification, and infiltrating growth (INF), followed for a median of 10 years (range, 1 to 20). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (10.5%) had recurrence and 15 patients (7.5%) died of breast cancer. Univariate analysis showed that PCNA, clinical tumor size, HG, angiogenesis, and LVI were significantly predictive of 20-year RFS or OS. Tumor necrosis was significantly predictive of OS, not of RFS. Multi-variate analysis showed that clinical tumor size (P = 0.0003), angiogenesis (P = 0.0003), PCNA (P = 0.0064), and HG (P = 0.0401) were significant independent prognostic factors for RFS. PCNA (P< 0.0001) and clinical tumor size (P = 0.0112) were significant independent prognostic factors for OS, while angiogenesis was a borderline significant factor. CONCLUSION: PCNA and angiogenesis were important new prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer patients.
Background Ovarian cancer has the worst outcome among gynecological malignancies; therefore, biomarkers that could contribute to the early diagnosis and/or prognosis prediction are urgently required. In the present study, we focused on the secreted protein spondin-1 (SPON1) and clarified the prognostic relevance in ovarian cancer. Methods We developed a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that selectively recognizes SPON1. Using this specific mAb, we determined the expression of SPON1 protein in the normal ovary, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), and ovarian cancer tissues, as well as in various normal adult tissues by immunohistochemistry, and verified its clinicopathological significance in ovarian cancer. Results The normal ovarian tissue was barely positive for SPON1, and no immunoreactive signals were detected in other healthy tissues examined, which was in good agreement with data obtained from gene expression databases. By contrast, upon semi-quantification, 22 of 242 ovarian cancer cases (9.1%) exhibited high SPON1 expression, whereas 64 (26.4%), 87 (36.0%), and 69 (28.5%) cases, which were designated as SPON1-low, possessed the moderate, weak, and negative SPON1 expression, respectively. The STIC tissues also possessed SPON1-positive signals. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate in the SPON1-high group (13.6%) was significantly lower than that in the SPON1-low group (51.2%). In addition, high SPON1 expression was significantly associated with several clinicopathological variables. Multivariable analysis revealed that high SPON1 was an independent prognostic factor for RFS of ovarian cancer. Conclusions SPON1 represents a prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer, and the anti-SPON1 mAb could be valuable as an outcome predictor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.