[1] Accurate quantification of evaporation from small water storages is essential for water management and planning, particularly in water-scarce regions. In order to ascertain suitable methods for direct measurement of evaporation from small water bodies, this study presents a comparison of eddy covariance and scintillometry measurements from a reservoir in southeast Queensland, Australia. The work presented expands on a short study presented by McJannet et al. (2011) to include comparisons of eddy covariance measurements and scintillometer-derived predictions of surface energy fluxes under a wide range of seasonal weather conditions. In this study, analysis was undertaken to ascertain whether important theoretical assumptions required for both techniques are valid in the complex environment of a small reservoir. Statistical comparison, energy balance closure, and the relationship between evaporation measurements and key environmental controls were used to compare the results of the two techniques. Reasonable agreement was shown between the sensible heat flux measurements from eddy covariance and scintillometry, while scintillometerderived estimates of latent heat flux were approximately 21% greater than eddy covariance measurements. We suggest possible reasons for this difference and provide recommendations for further research for improving measurements of surface energy fluxes over small water bodies using eddy covariance and scintillometry.

[1] The use of scintillometers to determine sensible and latent heat flux is becoming increasingly common because of their ability to quantify convective fluxes over distances of hundreds of meters to several kilometers. The majority of investigations using scintillometry have focused on processes above land surfaces, but here we propose a new methodology for obtaining sensible and latent heat fluxes from a scintillometer deployed over open water. This methodology has been tested by comparison with eddy covariance measurements and through comparison with alternative scintillometer calculation approaches that are commonly used in the literature. The methodology is based on linearization of the Bowen ratio, which is a common assumption in models such as Penman's model and its derivatives. Comparison of latent heat flux estimates from the eddy covariance system and the scintillometer showed excellent agreement across a range of weather conditions and flux rates, giving a high level of confidence in scintillometry-derived latent heat fluxes. The proposed approach produced better estimates than other scintillometry calculation methods because of the reliance of alternative methods on measurements of water temperature or water body heat storage, which are both notoriously hard to quantify. The proposed methodology requires less instrumentation than alternative scintillometer calculation approaches, and the spatial scales of required measurements are arguably more compatible. In addition to scintillometer measurements of the structure parameter of the refractive index of air, the only measurements required are atmospheric pressure, air temperature, humidity, and wind speed at one height over the water body.

No abstract

No abstract

Accurate methods of latent heat flux quantification are essential for water management and for use in hydrological and meteorological models. Currently the effect of small lakes in most numerical weather prediction modelling systems is either entirely ignored or crudely parameterized. In order to test methods for modelling hourly latent heat flux from small water bodies, this study compares results from several modelling approaches to values measured by the eddy covariance method at an agricultural reservoir in southeast Queensland, Australia.Mass transfer estimates of LE calculated using the theoretical mass transfer model and using the Tanny et al. (2008)