The cosmic-ray probe (CRP) provides continuous estimates of soil moisture over an area of $30 ha by counting fast neutrons produced from cosmic rays which are predominantly moderated by water molecules in the soil. This paper describes the setup, measurement correction procedures, and field calibration of CRPs at nine locations across Australia with contrasting soil type, climate, and land cover. These probes form the inaugural Australian CRP network, which is known as CosmOz. CRP measurements require neutron count rates to be corrected for effects of atmospheric pressure, water vapor pressure changes, and variations in incoming neutron intensity. We assess the magnitude and importance of these corrections and present standardized approaches for network-wide analysis. In particular, we present a new approach to correct for incoming neutron intensity variations and test its performance against existing procedures used in other studies. Our field calibration results indicate that a generalized calibration function for relating neutron counts to soil moisture is suitable for all soil types, with the possible exception of very sandy soils with low water content. Using multiple calibration data sets, we demonstrate that the generalized calibration function only applies after accounting for persistent sources of hydrogen in the soil profile. Finally, we demonstrate that by following standardized correction procedures and scaling neutron counting rates of all CRPs to a single reference location, differences in calibrations between sites are related to site biomass. This observation provides a means for estimating biomass at a given location or for deriving coefficients for the calibration function in the absence of field calibration data.
Abstract:This paper highlights the relevant issues influencing the amount and arrangement of ground cover in savanna rangelands in Australia, and presents field measurements from hillslope scale flumes, which demonstrate how runoff and sediment loss vary with spatial patterns in ground cover. Hillslopes with relatively high mean cover, but with small patches bare of vegetation, are shown to have between 6 and 9 times more runoff, and up to 60 times more sediment loss than similar hillslopes that do not contain bare patches. The majority of sediment lost from the hillslopes is composed of fine (suspended) rather than coarse (bedload) material, although the absolute sediment loads are comparatively low. These low loads are considered to be the result of lower than average rainfall during the measurement period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005) and the high and prolonged rates of historical hillslope erosion that have exhausted the erodible material from the A-horizon. The collected data also demonstrate that a large proportion of soil is lost during the initial 'flushing' period of runoff events.The results presented have important implications for the management of savanna grazing systems by highlighting (i) the significance of bare patches in contributing to runoff and soil loss from hillslopes; (ii) the importance of having medium to high cover patches at the bottom of hillslopes for trapping and storing sediment and therefore reducing its entry into the stream network; and (iii) how maintenance of ground cover during the dry season reduces sediment concentrations in runoff occurring early in the wet season.
Abstract:This article presents a comprehensive study of canopy interception in six rainforests in Australia's Wet Tropics for periods ranging between 2 and 3Ð5 years. Measurements of rainfall, throughfall, stemflow and cloud interception were made at sites characterized by different forest types, canopy structure, altitude, rainfall and exposure to prevailing winds. Throughfall at these sites ranged between 64 and 83% of total precipitation inputs, while stemflow ranged between 2 and 11%. At sites higher than 1000 m, cloud interception was found to contribute up to 66% of the monthly water input to the forest, more than twice the rainfall at these times. Over the entire study period, cloud interception accounted for between 4 and 30% of total precipitation inputs, and was related more to the exposure of sites to prevailing winds than to altitudinal differences alone.Over the duration of the study period, interception losses ranged between 22 and 29% of total water input (rainfall and cloud interception) at all sites except the highest altitude site on Bellenden Ker, where interception was 6% of total water input. This smaller interception loss was the result of extremely high rainfall, prolonged immersion in cloud and a sparser canopy. On a monthly basis, interception losses from the six sites varied between 10 and 88% of rainfall. All sites had much higher interception losses during the dry season than in the wet season because of the differences in storm size and rainfall intensity. The link between rainfall conditions and interception losses has important implications for how evaporative losses from forests may respond to altered rainfall regimes under climate change and/or large-scale atmospheric circulation variations such as El Niño.
Abstract:Transpiration of four different rainforest types in north Queensland, Australia, was determined using the heat pulse technique for periods ranging between 391 and 657 days. Despite the complexity of the natural rainforest systems being studied, the relationship between sample tree size and daily water use was found to be strong, thus providing a robust means by which to scale transpiration from individual trees to the entire forest stand. Transpiration was shown to be dependent on solar radiation and atmospheric demand for moisture with little evidence of limitation by soil moisture supply. Total stand transpiration was controlled by forest characteristics such as stem density, size distribution and sapwood area. Annual transpiration for each of the four sites ranged between 353 mm for cloud forest and 591 mm for montane rainforest. In comparison with the international literature, transpiration from Australian rainforests is low; the reasons for this could be related to a combination of differences in forest structure, climatic conditions, canopy wetness duration and tree physiology.
The semitheoretical universal calibration function (UCF) for estimating soil moisture using cosmic-ray neutron sensors was tested by comparing to field measurements made with the same neutron detector across a range of climates, soil, latitude, altitude, and biomass. There was a strong correlation between neutron intensity and the total amount of hydrogen at each site; however, the relationship differed from that predicted by the UCF. A linear fit to field measurements explained 99% of the observed variation and provides a robust empirical means to estimate soil moisture at other sites. It was concluded that measurement errors, neutron count corrections, and scaling to remove altitudinal and geomagnetic differences were unlikely to explain differences between observations and the UCF. The differences may be attributable to the representation of organic carbon, biomass or detector geometry in the neutron particle code, or to differences in the neutron energy levels being measured by the cosmic-ray sensor and modeled using the particle code. The UCF was derived using simulations of epithermal neutrons; however, lower energy thermal neutrons may also be important. Using neutron transport code, we show the differences in response of thermal and epithermal neutrons to the relative size of the hydrogen pool. Including a thermal neutron component in addition to epithermal neutrons in a modified UCF provided a better match to field measurements; however, thermal neutron measurements are needed to confirm these results. A simpler generalized relationship for estimating soil moisture from neutron counts was also tested with encouraging results for low biomass sites.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.