Background Most patients with migraine report associated neck pain. Whether neck pain is a symptom of migraine or an indicator for associated cervical musculoskeletal impairment has not yet been determined. Physical examination tests to detect cervical impairments in people with headache have been suggested, but results have not been evaluated systematically and combined in meta-analyses. Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify musculoskeletal impairments in people with migraine and people who were healthy (healthy controls) by reviewing published data on physical examination results. Data Sources PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials were searched for studies published prior to December 2017. Study Selection Publications investigating physical examination procedures that are feasible for use in a physical therapy setting for patients with migraine and healthy controls were independently selected by 2 researchers. Data Extraction One researcher extracted the data into predesigned data extraction tables. Entries were checked for correctness by a second researcher. The Downs and Black Scale was used for risk-of-bias assessment by 2 reviewers independently. Data Synthesis Thirty-five studies (involving 1033 participants who were healthy [healthy controls] and 1371 participants with migraine) were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 18 were included in the meta-analyses (544 healthy controls and 603 participants with migraine). Overall, studies were rated as having a low to moderate risk of bias. Included studies reported 20 different test procedures. Combined mean effects indicated that 4 of the tests included in the meta-analyses distinguished between patients and controls: range of cervical motion, flexion-rotation, pressure pain thresholds, and forward head posture in a standing position. Limitations Manual joint testing and evaluation of trigger points were the 2 most frequently investigated tests not included in the meta-analyses because of heterogeneity of reporting and procedures. Conclusions Three tests confirmed the presence of musculoskeletal impairments in participants with migraine when combined in meta-analyses. Pressure pain thresholds added information on sensory processing. Additional tests might be useful but require standardized protocols and reporting.

To evaluate the content of patient education and cognitive behavioural therapy and its effectiveness in the prevention of migraine for adults, a systematic search was conducted in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. RCTs published in the past 10 years in German or English, reporting on any form of patient education or cognitive behavioural therapy for adult migraineurs, were included. Two reviewers independently searched and evaluated search results. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 independently by two reviewers. Data on content and effectiveness were extracted in a predesigned table. Across 1059 records, 14 studies were eligible, including 2266 participants (82,7% females). Contents of patient education included explanations on the link between thoughts and feelings, information on lifestyle influences on headaches, relaxation techniques and stress management, advice on diet and the benefit of physical activity. In addition, patient education focussed on the pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria of migraine, triggering factors and effective acute or prophylactic drug use. Outcome measures included headache frequency, medication intake, function and disability, as well as psychosocial status. Education reduced migraine frequency and improved quality of life. Effect sizes were small, and contents were heterogeneous. Educational and behavioural approaches can positively influence headache frequency. However, the content, duration and frequency and education formats varied widely. The level of evidence for education and cognitive behavioural therapy as a non-pharmacological intervention for migraine is still low. The protocol for the systematic review was registered in the database PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019134463) prior to the data collection.

No abstract

Health problem: The prevalence of low back pain ranges from 74 to 85%, almost everybody in Germany suffers from low back pain once in his or her life. The recurrence rate within twelve months is 62%, which often leads to inability to work and reduction in earning capacity. The rate of chronic manifestation of low back pain is 5%. Subsequent loss of mobility and functional disability lowers quality of life and participation in private life and at work. Evidence: A recent Cochrane review (Kamper et al., 2014) analysed six (outcome disability) and seven (outcome pain) studies with 722 and 821 participants respectively and showed that multidisciplinary rehabilitation compared to usual care has a small, but clinically relevant effect (pain: SMD -0,21 [CI 95% -0,37; -0,04]; disability: SMD -0,23 4;06]). There is a lack of evidence about the intervention conception, patient-centred outcomes and the cost effectiveness. Implication for research: Prior to a randomised controlled trial a feasibility study about individualised multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation compared to usual care considering people with chronic low back pain at employable age in Germany is needed. The applicability of available manuals, patient-centred outcomes and cost effectiveness should be explored.Potential analyse -chronic low back pain -multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation Issue 1, 2017, Pages 33-42, ISSN 2296-990X, DOI: 10.1515/ijhp-2017 Keywords Abstract INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONSPotential analysis of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain Gesundheitsproblem: Rückenschmerz hat eine Lebenszeitprävalenz von 74-85 %, sodass fast jeder Mensch in Deutschland einmal von einer Rückenschmerzepisode betroffen sein wird. 62 % der Betroffenen bekommen innerhalb von zwölf Monaten nach der ersten Rückenschmerzepisode ein Rezidiv, was häufig zu Arbeitsunfähigkeit oder langfristig zu Erwerbsminderung führen kann. Die Chronifizierungsrate von Rückenschmerzen liegt bei 5-8 %. Durch Mobilitätsverlust und Funktionseinschränkung kann es zu einem Verlust an Lebensqualität sowie zu Einschränkungen der Partizipation im privaten sowie beruflichen Bereich kommen. Evidenzlage: Ein Cochrane Review von Kamper et al. (2014) zeigt auf Grundlage von sechs Studien für den Endpunkt "funktionelle Beeinträchtigung" bzw. sieben Studien für den Endpunkt "Schmerz" mit 722 bzw. 821 Teilnehmenden, dass multidisziplinäre Rehabilitation im Vergleich zu "normaler" Versorgung hinsichtlich funktioneller Beeinträchtigung und Schmerz einen kleinen, jedoch klinisch relevanten Effekt zeigt (Schmerz: SMD -0,21 37;04]; Beeinträchtigung SMD -0,23 4;06] METHODE Für die Informationen zu dem Gesundheitsproblem wurde eine Recherche im Januar und Februar 2015 sowie imNovember 2016 in PubMed mit den Suchworten "chronic low back pain", "multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation", "patient centered outcomes" durchgeführt. Bei der Suche nach qualitätsgesicherten Reviews wurde ein relevantes Cochrane Re...

No abstract

Aim To assess the efficacy of pain neuroscience education combined with physiotherapy for the management of migraine. Background Physiotherapy can significantly reduce the frequency of migraine, but the evidence is based only on a few studies. Pain neuroscience education might pose a promising treatment, as it addresses migraine as a chronic pain disease. Methods In this non-blinded randomized controlled trial, migraine patients received physiotherapy + pain neuroscience education or physiotherapy alone, preceded by a three-month waiting period. Primary outcomes were frequency of headache (with and without migraine features), frequency of migraine and associated disability. Results Eighty-two participants were randomized and analyzed. Both groups showed a decrease of headache frequency (p = 0.02, d = 0.46) at post-treatment (physiotherapy: 0.77 days, 95%CI: −0.75 to 2.29 and physiotherapy + pain neuroscience education: 1.25 days, 95%CI: −0.05 to 2.55) and at follow-up (physiotherapy: 1.93, 95%CI: 0.07 to 3.78 and physiotherapy + pain neuroscience education: 3.48 days, 95%CI: 1.89 to 5.06), with no difference between groups (p = 0.26, d = 0.26). Migraine frequency was reduced significantly in the physiotherapy + pain neuroscience education group, and not in the physiotherapy group, at post-treatment (1.28 days, 95%CI: 0.34 to 2.22, p = 0.004) and follow-up (3.05 days, 95%CI: 1.98 to 5.06, p < 0.0001), with a difference between groups at follow-up (2.06 days, p = 0.003). Migraine-related disability decreased significantly in both groups (physiotherapy: 19.8, physiotherapy + pain neuroscience education: 24.0 points, p < 0.001, d = 1.15) at follow-up, with no difference between groups (p = 0.583). Secondary outcomes demonstrated a significant effect of time with no interaction between time and group. No harm or adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusion In comparison to physiotherapy alone, pain neuroscience education combined with physiotherapy can further reduce the frequency of migraine, but had no additional effect on general headache frequency or migraine-related disability. Trial Registration The study was pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00020804).

Objective The goal of this study was to reach consensus about the best exercise prescription parameters, the most relevant considerations, and other recommendations that could be useful for prescribing exercise to patients with migraine. Methods This was an international study conducted between April 9, 2022 and June 30, 2022. An expert panel of health care and exercise professionals was assembled, and a 3-round Delphi survey was performed. Consensus was reached for each item if an Aiken V Validity Index ≥0.7 was obtained. Results The study included 14 experts who reached consensus on 42 items by the third round. The most approved prescription parameters were 30 to 60 minutes of exercise per session, 3 days per week of moderate-intensity continuous aerobic exercise, and relaxation and breathing exercises for 5 to 20 minutes every day. When considering an exercise prescription, initial exercise supervision should progress to patient self-regulation; catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, headache-related disability, anxiety, depression, physical activity baseline level, and self-efficacy could influence the patients’ exercise participation and efficacy; and gradual exposure to exercise could help improve these psychological variables and increase exercise efficacy. Yoga and concurrent exercise were also included as recommended interventions. Conclusions From the experts in the study, exercise prescriptions should be adapted to patients with migraine considering different exercise modalities, such as moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, relaxation, yoga, and concurrent exercise, based on the patients’ preferences and psychological considerations, level of physical activity, and possible adverse effects. Impact The consensus reached by the experts can help prescribe exercise accurately to patients with migraine. Offering various exercise modalities can improve exercise participation in this population. The evaluation of the patients’ psychological and physical status can also facilitate the adaptation of the exercise prescription to their abilities and diminish the risk of adverse events.