Gamma knife surgery is a safe and effective way to relieve TN. Patients who attain between 75 and 89% pain relief are much more likely to describe this outcome as good or excellent than those who attain between 50 and 74% pain relief.
Background: Although gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), there are few studies that report the results of a second GKRS. Method: Between May 22, 1998 and April 1, 2003, we treated 335 primary TN patients with GKRS. All received a maximum dose of 75 Gy to the cisternal trigeminal nerve. 45 patients with recurrent or persistent TN were treated with a maximum dose of 40 Gy at a second GKRS and were available for at least 6 months of follow-up. Results: Final pain relief (mean of 15 months after second GKRS) was 50% or greater in 28 of the 45 patients (62.2%). Patients who had no neurosurgical procedure prior to their first GKRS were more likely to have pain relief of 50% or greater following the second GKRS (p = 0.042). Significant new dysesthesias (score greater than 5 on a scale of 0–10) developed in 2 patients (4.4%). Conclusion: Repeat GKRS has a good chance of relieving TN pain without complications and is more likely to relieve pain in those who did not have any procedure prior to their first GKRS.
Object. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) as the primary rather than secondary management for trigeminal neuralgia.
Methods. Eighty-two patients underwent GKS as their first neurosurgical intervention (Group A), and 90 patients underwent GKS following a different procedure (Group B). All GKS patients were treated with a maximum dose of 75 Gy. The single 4-mm isocenter was placed close to the junction of the trigeminal nerve and the brainstem. Six-month follow up was available for 126 patients and 12-month follow up for 84 patients.
Excellent (no pain and no medicine) or good (at least 50% reduction in pain and less medicine) relief was more likely to occur in Group A than in Group B patients 6 and 12 months following GKS for trigeminal neuralgia (p = 0.058). Excellent or good results were also more likely in patients with trigeminal neuralgia without multiple sclerosis (MS) (p = 0.042). The number and type of procedures performed prior to GKS, the interval between the last procedure and GKS, and the interval from first symptom to GKS (within Groups A and B) did not affect 6-month outcome. The interval between first symptom and GKS was shorter in Group A patients without MS (87 months) than in Group B (148 months; p < 0.004). There were no significant differences between Group A and B patients with regard to sex, age, or laterality.
Conclusions. Patients with trigeminal neuralgia who are treated with GKS as primary management have better pain relief than those treated with GKS as secondary management. Patients are more likely to have pain relief if they do not have MS.
Background: Patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia were treated by one neurosurgeon with either microvascular decompression (MVD) or Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and were prospectively evaluated with a uniform protocol. Method: GKRS was done with 75 Gy maximum to the cisternal trigeminal nerve near the pons. MVD was done without cauterizing or cutting the trigeminal nerve. Results: Twenty-four patients were treated with MVD and 61 with GKRS. Complete pain relief (no pain no medicines) occurred at 12 and 18 months in 68 and 68% of patients treated with MVD and 58 and 24% with GKRS (p = 0.089), and ≧90% pain relief (with or without medicine) at 12 and 18 months in 90 and 78% with MVD and 75 and 48% with GKRS (p = 0.171). There were no permanent complications. Conclusion: Although many trigeminal neuralgia patients treated with either MVD or GKRS have pain relief, MVD is more likely than GKRS to result in complete pain relief.
Object. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume of brainstem that receives 20% or more of the maximum dose (VB20) and the volume of the trigeminal nerve that receives 50% or more of the maximum dose (VT50) on clinical outcome following gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN).
Methods. Patients with TN were treated with a single 4-mm isocenter with a maximum dose of 75 Gy directed at the trigeminal nerve close to where it leaves the brainstem. The VB20 and VT50, as determined on dose—volume histograms, were correlated with clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months, laterality, presence of multiple sclerosis (MS), and each other.
At 6 months excellent pain relief (no pain or required medicine) was achieved in 27 of 48 patients (p = 0.009) when VB20 was greater than or equal to 20 mm3 and in 25 of 78 when VB20 was less than 20 mm3, when all patients are considered. At 12 months excellent pain relief was achieved in 16 of 32 patients (p = 0.038) when VB20 was greater than or equal to 20 mm3 and in 14 of 52 when VB20 less than 20 mm3, when all patients are considered. When VB20 was less than 20 mm3 in MS patients, five of 21 had an excellent result at 6 months and two of 13 at 12 months. The VB20 was 20 mm3 or more in 38 of 64 on the right side and in eight of 41 on the left side (p < 0.001) in patients with TN and without MS. There is a difference between left and right dose—volume histograms even when the same isodose is placed on the surface of the brainstem.
The VB20 was 20 mm3 or more in 45 of 105 patients with TN and without MS but in only three of 21 patients with TN and MS (p = 0.014). There was an inverse relationship between VB20 and VT50 (p = 0.01).
Conclusions. Isocenter proximity to the brainstem, as reflected in a higher VB20, is associated with a greater chance of excellent outcome at 6 and 12 months. Worse results in patients with TN and MS may be partly explained by a lower VB20.
In patients who have not undergone previous surgery for TN, BV-CN V contact revealed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging may indicate a particularly favorable response to GKRS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.