1987
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520160021008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigeminal Neuralgia and Multiple Sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, an important number of patients with MS-related TN (11 patients, 29.7%) had bilateral pain. As underlined before, this fact had also been stated by other studies [25,26]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this paper, an important number of patients with MS-related TN (11 patients, 29.7%) had bilateral pain. As underlined before, this fact had also been stated by other studies [25,26]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Bilaterality was slightly more (16%) than in the literature (12%) and MS was more frequent (5.5%) than in the literature (2%) likely related to overrepresentation of women in the sample. Women are more likely to have MS and MS is the most common (18%) known cause of bilateral trigeminal neuralgia [13,14]. Aside from this, the demographics and clinical features of our patients are in line with the literature indicating that even though they were not consecutive patients-impossible to obtain the low cost and novel method employed-they truly represent most TN patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[714] Certainly, the present lack documentation of the safety/efficacy of BMP-2 “off-label” in the anterior cervical spine should make it an investigational drug/device. [1413]…”
Section: Questions Raised About Bmp-2: Dosage Indications Containmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, there had to be some reason to believe that the agent was both safe and effective for its intended use. [1413]…”
Section: Major Initial Error: Failure To Understand Limitations Of “Omentioning
confidence: 99%