Pekerjaan dan penghidupan yang layak bagi kemanusiaan adalah bagian dari hak asasi bagi setiap orang, termasuk Penyandang Disabilitas, sehingga UUD 1945 memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hukum bagi pelaksanaannya. Permasalahannya adalah sikap diskriminatif terhadap penyandang disabilitas dan tingkat pendidikan penyandang disabilitas yang rendah sebagai kesenjangan antara penyandang disabilitas dengan pekerja non disabilitas. Ketiadaan data pasti terkait jumlah tenaga kerja penyandang disabilitas baik sektor swasta maupun sektor non swasta (PNS, BUMN dan BUMD) menimbulkan permasalahan tersendiri dalam perlindungan bagi penyandang disabilitas. Ketentuan minimal kuota 2 persen yang wajib bagi pemerintah, PEMDA, BUMN, dan BUMD dan 1 persen bagi perusahaan swasta dari jumlah pegawai atau pekerja dalam UU Penyandang Disabilitas ternyata juga tidak cukup memberikan perlindungan bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif untuk meneliti peraturan perundang-undangan agar diperoleh keadilan bagi penyandang disabilitas. Hal itu menjadi sangat penting sebagai bentuk komitmen pemerintah melalui pengawasan dan pembenahan kebijakan menjadi sangat penting agar penyandang disabilitas memperoleh pekerjaan dan penghidupan yang layak.
Contempt of ruler or public body are criminal offence which stipulated in article 207 and 208 Penal Code of Indonesia. In practice, there is legal uncertainty because substantially contradict to Constitutional Court Decision No.013-022/PUU-IV/2006 about contempt of President/ Vice President and No. 6/PUU-V/2007 about contempt of Indonesia Government. This paper wants to found criminal legal policy and constitutionality on contempt of ruler or public body. The research method used is juridical normative with regulation, doctrinal, and decision approaches. The result of study shows changes of criminal law policy on contempt of ruler or public body based on comparison of current Penal Code and future Penal Code Draft with changes elements of formulation: (1) suspect; (2) intention; (3) victim; (4) sanction; (5) impact of action, the norms also transform from general offence to complaint offense. Next, analysis to Constitutional Court decisions about contempt of President/Vice President and Indonesia Government which declared null and void, found related legal reasoning: First, violate freedom of expression; Second, violate right to get information; Third, causing legal uncertainty; Fourth, no longer suitable with society development; Fifth, changes in norms on Criminal Code Draft; Sixth; follow previous decision; Seventh, against universal value in international law. Then, the constitutional interpretation methods used in the decisions are: (1) Ethical Interpretation; (2) Historical Interpretation; (3) Futuristic Interpretation; (4) Doctrinal Interpretation. Therefore, according on similar legal reasoning and constitutional interpretation, article 207 and 208 Penal Code also supposed to be stated unconstitutional.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dibentuk berdasarkan amanat reformasi 1998 yang menginginkan adanya penyelenggaraan negara yang bersih dari korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme. Sejak dibentuk dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, telah banyak kasus korupsi yang terselesaikan baik dalam skala sedang maupun skala besar. Namun, dengan berjalannya waktu sejak pembentukannya perlu peninjauan ulang pengaturan KPK mengingat semakin banyaknya pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait dengan kedudukan dan kewenangan KPK. Terlebih, sebagai peserta penandatangan dan peratifikasi UNCAC, sudah seharusnya mengakomodir kedua intrumen tersebut. Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai bagaimana politik hukum penguatan kewenangan KPK dalam sistem ketatanegaraan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah perlunya revisi UU tipikor dengan menyesuaikan pada putusan pengujian undang-undang di MK dan ketentuan yang ada dalam UNCAC, seperti perampasan aset, perekrutan penyidik mandiri, dan memasukkan KPK sebagai organ konstitusi.The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed based on the 1998’s reformation that implement good governance that clean from corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Since it was formed by Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Corruption Eradication Commission, there are many case have been solved in a medium and large scale. However, as time goes by, the Law needs to be reviewed because there are many judicial review towards Constitutional Court about the position and authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Moreover, Indonesia should make the Law that accommodate both of the instrument (position and authority) as a member that signed and ratified UNCAC. This research will discuss about how the legal politics of strengthens KPK’s authority in the constitutional system. This research used normative juridical method with comparative and case approach. The result shows that there’s a need to revise Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission in accordance to Constitutional Court’s Decision and UNCAC, like seizure of assets, recruitment of independent investigators, and the Corruption Eradication Commission as a constitution organ.
This article discusses the role of Islamic Law in enriching legal considerations of constitutional court decisions. As one of the recognized laws in Indonesia, it turns out that Islamic Law has an essential role in the development of national law, including the Constitutional Court decision. It was proven by the existence of 20 decisions by the Constitutional Court on judicial review of laws with Islamic Law. However, of the 20 decisions, there were only six decisions in which the Constitutional Court used Islamic Law as the basis for its consideration. In this article, we will discuss several things, namely the construction of Islamic Law and the development of positive law in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the penultimate part argues that efforts to legal positivism in Indonesia have been going on for a long time. Before conclusion, the last part believes that in fact, there are nuances of Islamic theory or Islamic Law used by the Constitutional Court judges in several decisions of the Constitutional Court.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.