Politik Hukum Penguatan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan

Abstract

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dibentuk berdasarkan amanat reformasi 1998 yang menginginkan adanya penyelenggaraan negara yang bersih dari korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme. Sejak dibentuk dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, telah banyak kasus korupsi yang terselesaikan baik dalam skala sedang maupun skala besar. Namun, dengan berjalannya waktu sejak pembentukannya perlu peninjauan ulang pengaturan KPK mengingat semakin banyaknya pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait dengan kedudukan dan kewenangan KPK. Terlebih, sebagai peserta penandatangan dan peratifikasi UNCAC, sudah seharusnya mengakomodir kedua intrumen tersebut. Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai bagaimana politik hukum penguatan kewenangan KPK dalam sistem ketatanegaraan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah perlunya revisi UU tipikor dengan menyesuaikan pada putusan pengujian undang-undang di MK dan ketentuan yang ada dalam UNCAC, seperti perampasan aset, perekrutan penyidik mandiri, dan memasukkan KPK sebagai organ konstitusi.The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed based on the 1998’s reformation that implement good governance that clean from corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Since it was formed by Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Corruption Eradication Commission, there are many case have been solved in a medium and large scale. However, as time goes by, the Law needs to be reviewed because there are many judicial review towards Constitutional Court about the position and authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Moreover, Indonesia should make the Law that accommodate both of the instrument (position and authority) as a member that signed and ratified UNCAC. This research will discuss about how the legal politics of strengthens KPK’s authority in the constitutional system. This research used normative juridical method with comparative and case approach. The result shows that there’s a need to revise Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission in accordance to Constitutional Court’s Decision and UNCAC, like seizure of assets, recruitment of independent investigators, and the Corruption Eradication Commission as a constitution organ.

The Auxiliary State Organ Authorities in Indonesia: The Constitutional Implications of Law No. 19 of 2019 Concerning KPK

“…The responsibility carried by the KPK is that, as one of the reform mandates in eradicating corruption, it has not found the right pattern in terms of the position and authority of the KPK. Because of this, there have been several trials of the KPK Law related to the KPK's authority (Agustine et al, 2019). From several decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding the review of laws relating to criminal acts of corruption, among others, the decisions of the Constitutional Court are as follows: Source: https://www.mkri.id/ It can be seen that there have been efforts to strengthen the KPK's authority by reviewing laws at the Constitutional Court.…”

“…Thus, the Constitutional Court actually confirmed the existence of the KPK and the strengthening of this institution in accordance with what was desired by the Constitution. The nature of being independent, self-sufficient, and free from the influence of any power makes the KPK a strong institution in eradicating corruption (Agustine et al, 2019). In Asimov's opinion, state commissions can be divided into two categories: First, an independent state commission, namely a state organ that is ideally independent and therefore outside the branches of executive, legislative and judicial power, but instead has a mixed function of the three.…”

Peristilahan Operasi Tangkap Tangan Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

“…17 Hadirnya KPK diharapkan mampu menjadi lembaga yang diandalkan dalam persoalan pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. 18 Dengan peraturan seperti yang tertera diatas maka KPK mempunyai fungsi:…”

Dissecting the Link Between Tax Crimes and Corruption: A Threats to Economic Stability

“…Several businesses or individuals may try to cheat the tax system in various ways, including hiding assets, manipulating financial statements, or collusion with corrupt tax officials. The involvement of parties who are supposed to enforce the law, in this case the tax authorities, creates an environment where acts of corruption can thrive (Agustine et al, 2019;Ali, 2018). The impact is not only limited to state fiscal losses, but also harms public trust in tax institutions and the government.…”