Statins are first-line drugs used to control patient lipid levels, but there is recent evidence that statin treatment can lower colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence by 50% and prolong CRC patient survival through mechanisms that are poorly understood. In this study, we found that the treatment of APCmin mice by the mevalonate pathway inhibitor lovastatin significantly reduced the number of colonic masses and improved hypersplenism and peripheral anemia. Furthermore, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of colonic mass tissues showed a potent inhibitory effect in both Wnt/β-catenin signaling and YAP/TAZ signaling in the lovastatin treatment group. The results of our transcriptomic analyses in RKO indicated that lovastatin regulated several proliferation-related signaling pathways. Moreover, lovastatin suppressed important genes and proteins related to the canonical Wnt/β-catenin and alternative Wnt-YAP/TAZ signaling pathways in RKO and SW480 cells, and these effects were rescued by mevalonic acid (MVA), as confirmed through a series of Western blotting, RT-PCR, and reporter assays. Given that statins suppress oncogenic processes primarily through the inhibition of Rho GTPase in the mevalonate pathway, we speculate that lovastatin can inhibit certain Rho GTPases to suppress both canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling and alternative Wnt-YAP/TAZ signaling. In RKO cells, lovastatin showed similar inhibitory properties as the RhoA inhibitor CCG1423, being able to inhibit β-catenin, TAZ, and p-LATS1 protein activity. Our results revealed that lovastatin inhibited RhoA activity, thereby suppressing the downstream canonical Wnt/β-catenin and alternative Wnt-YAP/TAZ pathways in colon cancer cells. These inhibitory properties suggest the promise of statins as a treatment for CRC. Altogether, the present findings support the potential clinical use of statins in non-cardiovascular contexts and highlight novel targets for anticancer treatments.

No abstract

No abstract

Although brain tumors occur less frequently than other forms of cancer, they have one of the bleakest prognoses with low survival rates. The conventional treatment for brain tumors includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, resistance to treatment remains a problem with recurrence shortly following. The resistance to treatment may be caused by cancer stem cells (CSCs), a subset of brain tumor cells with the affinity for self-renewal and differentiation into multiple cell lineages. An emerging approach to targeting CSCs in brain tumors is through repurposing the lipid-lowering medication, lovastatin. Lovastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that impacts the mevalonate pathway. The inhibition of intermediates in the mevalonate pathway affects signaling cascades and oncogenes associated with brain tumor stem cells (BTSC). In this review, we show the possible mechanisms where lovastatin can target BTSC for different varieties of malignant brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and medical specialties. We also examined the potential cost savings benefits of utilizing telemedicine. METHODS: 1189 Press Ganey surveys in the Department of Neuro-Oncology (982 in-person and 207 telemedicine) by surgical and medical neuro-oncology patients between 04/01/2020 and 06/30/2021 were reviewed. Survey results were divided into 4 categories (Access, Provider, Technology (telemedicine only), and Overall Satisfaction). Results were analyzed for the impact of telemedicine versus in-person visits, and gender, age, insurance, and specialty. Cost savings were calculated based on potential travel distance and lost productivity. RESULTS: Survey results from telemedicine visits demonstrated that patients with private insurance returned higher scores in the Provider (p=0.0089), Technology (p=0.00187), and Overall (p=0.00382) categories. Surgical visits returned higher scores for Access (p=0.0015), Technology (p=0.0002), and Overall (p=0.0019). When comparing telemedicine to in-person scores, in-person scored higher in Provider (p=0.0092) for all patients, while in-person scored higher in Access (p=0.0252) amongst surgical patients. Cost analysis revealed that telemedicine allowed patients to save an average of 3.7 to 4.8 hours per visit time and a potential loss of productivity of up to $223.27 ±171.41. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine yields equivalent patient satisfaction when employed in surgical as compared to medical Neuro-Oncology patients with the potential to lessen the financial and time burden on neuro-oncology patients.

Background Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation remains as one of the more technically challenging endovascular procedures. Portal vein access from the hepatic vein often requires multiple needle passes, which increases procedure times, risk of complications, and radiation exposure. With its bi-directional maneuverability, the Scorpion X access kit may be a promising tool for easier portal vein access. However, the clinical safety and feasibility of this access kit has yet to be determined. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, 17 patients (12 male, average age 56.6 ± 9.01) underwent TIPS procedure using Scorpion X portal vein access kits. The primary endpoint was time taken to access the portal vein from the hepatic vein. The most common indications for TIPS were refractory ascites (47.1%) and esophageal varices (17.6%). Radiation exposure, total number of needle passes, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Average MELD Score was 12.6 ± 3.39 (range: 8–20). Results Portal vein cannulation was successfully achieved in 100% of patients during intracardiac echocardiography-assisted TIPS creation. Total fluoroscopy time was 39.31 ± 17.97 min; average radiation dose was 1036.76 ± 644.15 mGy, while average contrast dose was 120.59 ± 56.87 mL. The average number of passes from the hepatic vein to the portal vein was 2 (range: 1–6). Average time to access the portal vein once the TIPS cannula was positioned in the hepatic vein was 30.65 ± 18.64 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Conclusions Clinical utilization of the Scorpion X bi-directional portal vein access kit is both safe and feasible. Utilizing this bi-directional access kit resulted in successful portal vein access with minimal intraoperative complications. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort.