No abstract

No abstract

The application of nanotechnology in pesticide delivery is relatively new and in the early stages of development. This technology aims to reduce the indiscriminate use of conventional pesticides and ensure their safe application. This critical review investigated the potential of nanotechnology, especially the nanoencapsulation process for pesticide delivery. In-depth investigation of various nanoencapsulation materials and techniques, efficacy of application, and current research trends are also presented. The focus of ongoing research was on the development of a nanoencapsulated pesticide formulation that has slow releasing properties with enhanced solubility, permeability, and stability. These properties are mainly achieved through either protecting the encapsulated active ingredients from premature degradation or increasing their pest control efficacy for a longer period. Nanoencapsulated pesticide formulation is able to reduce the dosage of pesticides and human exposure to them, which is environmentally friendly for crop protection. However, lack of knowledge of the mechanism of synthesis and lack of a cost-benefit analysis of nanoencapsulation materials hindered their application in pesticide delivery. Further investigation of these materials' behavior and their ultimate fate in the environment will help the establishment of a regulatory framework for their commercialization. The review provides fundamental and critical information for researchers and engineers in the field of nanotechnology and especially the use of nanoencapsulation techniques to deliver pesticides.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Currently, a number of in vitro methods are in use worldwide to assess arsenic (As) bioaccessibility in soils. However, a dearth of research has been undertaken to compare the efficacy of the in vitro methods for estimating in vivo relative As bioavailability. In this study, As bioaccessibility in contaminated soils (n = 12) was assessed using four in vitro assays (SBRC, IVG, PBET, DIN). In vitro results were compared to in vivo relative As bioavailability data (swine assay) to ascertain which methodologies best correlate with in vivo data. Arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils varied depending on the in vitro method employed. For the SBRC and IVG methods, As bioaccessibility generally decreased when gastric-phase values were compared to the intestinal phase. In contrast, extending the PBET and DIN assays from the gastric to the intestinal phase resulted in an increase in As bioaccessibility for some soils tested. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo results demonstrated that the in vitro assay encompassing the SBRC gastric phase provided the best prediction of in vivo relative As bioavailability (R(2) = 0.75, Pearson correlation = 0.87). However, relative As bioavailability could also be predicted using gastric or intestinal phases of IVG, PBET, and DIN assays but with varying degrees of confidence (R(2) = 0.53-0.67, Pearson correlation = 0.73-0.82).

No abstract