2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: A critical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
307
0
20

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 788 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
2
307
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies improve our understanding on biodegradation mechanisms and on degradation abilities of different strains (Bombach et al, 2010). However, the degradative abilities of these bacteria are often depressed under field conditions (Markiewicz et al, 2011;Megharaj et al, 2011). This is partly attributed to the fact that laboratory studies are performed in artificial media (mostly mineral salts media) with optimized nutrients and culture conditions, high concentrations of bacteria and the absence of competition with indigenous bacterial populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies improve our understanding on biodegradation mechanisms and on degradation abilities of different strains (Bombach et al, 2010). However, the degradative abilities of these bacteria are often depressed under field conditions (Markiewicz et al, 2011;Megharaj et al, 2011). This is partly attributed to the fact that laboratory studies are performed in artificial media (mostly mineral salts media) with optimized nutrients and culture conditions, high concentrations of bacteria and the absence of competition with indigenous bacterial populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before their introduction biopreparations require recovery to achieve full revival of degradation activity [6,40]. Furthermore, it is not possible to check before buying whether microorganisms contained in the biopreparation are not antagonists to microorganisms naturally present in the treated soil.…”
Section: Application Of Biopreparations and Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention should be paid to the use of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, with the bacterial gene merH, which is not only more resistant to toxic mercury chloride, but also has the ability to secrete mercury into the atmosphere in the non-toxic form [40]. Moreover, the effect of this group of microorganisms may also consist in the production of various compounds by the bacteria collected by plants (eg vitamins such as biotin, pantothenic acid, niacin, pyridoxine, thiamine), increasing the bioavailability of nutrients contained in the medium or inhibiting the development of pathogens and reducing the collection of compounds that inhibit the growth of the plants (eg ethylene and hydrogen cyanide) [39,40].…”
Section: Application Of Biopreparations and Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides technical challenges relating to in situ efficacy (including survival and competition with indigenous microorganisms), such environmental concerns, and problems with solutions that were able to unequivocally alleviate them (e.g. conditional suicide mechanisms [107] have posed major hurdles to the commercialization of any GEM products for in situ use so far [56]. Upcoming approaches based on systems and synthetic biology could improve the issue of poor in situ efficiency of GEMs [109] and could thus make the release of GEMs for bioremediation applications more attractive.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While decontamination of water or soil by microorganisms (bioremediation) is a process that can occur naturally (intrinsic bioremediation), it may be enhanced by the addition of nutrients (biostimulation), additional microorganisms (bioaugmentation) or by plants (phytoremediation) [56]. .…”
Section: (Ii) Removal Of Environmental Pollution By Genetically Enginmentioning
confidence: 99%