Engagement with social media is increasing within medical professionals. There are many different platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Twitter, Telegram, and so on. Social media is a new and important tool for surgical education. More and more surgeons are joining restricted groups to discuss surgical techniques, manuscripts, etc in a daily basis. It is important that residents and surgeons have a very critical opinion about what they look online. Not everything is good or feasible.
Objective: To evaluate the use of social media platforms by medical students, surgical trainees, and practicing surgeons for surgical education during the Covid-19 pandemic.Methods: An online, 15-question survey was developed and posted on Facebook and WhatsApp closed surgeon groups.Results: The online survey was completed by 219 participants from South America (87%), North America (7%), Europe (5%), Central America, and Asia. Respondents included medical students (6.4%), surgical residents/fellows (24.2%), and practicing surgeons (69.4%). The most common age group was 35-44 years. When asked which social media platforms they preferred, the video sharing site YouTube (33.3%), the messaging app WhatsApp (21%), and "other" (including videoconferencing sites) (22.3%) were most popular. Respondents reported using social media for surgical education either daily (38.4%) or weekly (45.2%), for an average of 1-5 hours/week. Most (85%) opined that surgical conferences that were cancelled during the pandemic should be made available online, with live discussions. Conclusion:Social media use for surgical education during Covid-19 appears to be increasing and evolving.
Gonçalves MDG, Moreira RS, Lira NRT, Cordeiro RN, Lima DL, Andrade GHV. Aneurisma de artéria hepática comum: relato de caso e revisão da literatura / Aneurysm of artery hepatic common: case report and review of the literature. Rev Med (São Paulo). 2019 set.-out.;98(5):353-7.
Background Social media use has exploded, attaining a significant influence within medicine. Previous studies have denoted the use of social media in various surgical specialties as a means to exchange professional ideas and improve the conference experience and at the same time, some have assessed its feasibility as a method of education. This systematic review aims to characterize the use of social media as a tool for general surgery education. Methods A systematic review of several databases from each database inception was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The JBI’s critical appraisal tools were used to assess quality of the studies. Results A total of 861 articles were identified of which 222 were duplicates removed. The titles and abstracts from the remaining 639 abstracts were screened and 589 were excluded. The remaining 51 full articles were analyzed for eligibility, of which 24 met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies covered the general surgery specialty, of which 11 ( n = 46%) focused on the laparoscopic surgical approach, 1 ( n = 4%) on robotic-assisted surgical procedures, 1 ( n = 4%) on both surgical approaches previously mentioned and 11 ( n = 46%) on the general surgery specialty regardless of the surgical approach or technique. Conclusions Advantages that SM offers should be considered, and content creators and institutions should help collectively to make sure that the content being published is evidence and guideline-based so its use it is taken to the maximum benefit. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9.
Background: As the minimally invasive surgery revolution approaches 30 years, many techniques are now available for cholecystectomy: open, conventional laparoscopy, ini-laparoscopy, single incision, robotic, and natural orifice. Although much has been published about patient preferences regarding these techniques, less is known about surgeon perceptions and preferences. The aim of this study was to survey attending and trainee surgeons about which cholecystectomy technique they would prefer for themselves and what factors determine their decision. Methods: Attending fellow and resident surgeons globally completed a Google Forms online questionnaire that was posted in 3 closed groups for surgeons on Facebook and WhatsApp. Results: The online questionnaire was completed by 600 surgeons (453 attending surgeons and 147 residents/fellows). Most respondents were male individuals (87.6% of attending surgeons, 78.2% of trainee surgeons). The most common age range of respondents was 31 to 40 years. Surgeon response was global, with especially good representation from North American, Asian, and European physicians. When conventional laparoscopy, mini-laparoscopy, and robotic surgery were the options offered for cholecystectomy, 58.5% of trainees and 45.7% of surgeons chose conventional laparoscopy. When asked if they would consider a single-incision or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery approach, 91.5% answered no. When asked which technique they would prefer if hypothetically all techniques were equally safe, about three-fourths chose either conventional laparoscopy (46%) or mini-laparoscopy (27%). When asked to rank which factors they considered most important in choosing a surgical technique, surgeon experience (52%) and safety of the procedure (45%) were the 2 most important factors. Conclusions: When an international sample of 600 attending and trainee surgeons were asked about undergoing a cholecystectomy on themselves, most chose either conventional laparoscopy or mini-laparoscopy as their preferred access technique. Single-incision and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery approaches were unpopular. Surgeons ranked the experience of the operating surgeon and safety of the procedure as the most important factors guiding their decision.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar as diferentes posições e situações anatômicas do apêndice em pacientes pediátricos com apendicite aguda. MÉTODO: Estudo observacional do tipo corte transversal, realizado em Agosto de 2015 a Julho de 2016, na Emergência Pediátrica do Hospital da Restauração, na cidade do Recife. A amostra foi composta por 56 pacientes na faixa etária de 7 a 13 anos diagnosticados com apendicite aguda. Os dados clínico-epidemiológicos dos participantes foram obtidos antes do procedimento cirúrgico. Durante a cirurgia, foram coletadas as características anatômicas do apêndice (posição, situação, comprimento e fase da apendicite). RESULTADOS: As posições encontradas foram pélvica (37,5%), retrocecal (28,6%), pré-ileal (10,7%), pós-ileal (8,9%), subcecal (8,9%) e paracecal (5.4%). Quanto à situação, a mais vista foi descendente (46,4%), seguida por ascendente (28,6%), interna (19,6%) e externa (5,4%). As principais manifestações clínicas observadas foram dor em fossa ilíaca direita, vômitos e náuseas, independentemente da posição. Verificou-se que a fase inflamatória da apendicite foi a mais frequente em todas as posições, exceto na subcecal com 60% dos apêndices na fase perfurada. No entanto, não houve associação estatisticamente significante entre a posição subcecal e a fase da apendicite complicada (p=0,367). CONCLUSÃO: A posição pélvica e a situação descendente foram as mais frequentes na população de estudo. Não houve associação estatisticamente significante da posição do apêndice com a fase da apendicite e nem com o quadro clínico.
We describe the original technique used for the treatment of a patient who presented with pain and bulging in the abdomen, who was diagnosed with Spigelian hernia (SH) using ultrasound. In this case, the hernia occurred in the anterolateral abdominal wall with herniation of the distal ileum and mesentery, in addition to a large right inguinal hernia. A mini-laparoscopic approach was proposed; due to Child-A hepatic cirrhosis, it was done by a hybrid technique, using a harmonic scalpel. The primary closure of the hernia defects was performed, followed by the placement of a polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh was fixed. In this case, the inguinal hernia was homolateral to the SH. Following the surgery, the patient had no further complications, being discharged the day after the procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.