The ability of several water models to predict the properties of ices is discussed. The emphasis is put on the results for the densities and the coexistence curves between the different ice forms. It is concluded that none of the most commonly used rigid models is satisfactory. A new model specifically designed to cope with solid-phase properties is proposed. The parameters have been obtained by fitting the equation of state and selected points of the melting lines and of the coexistence lines involving different ice forms. The phase diagram is then calculated for the new potential. The predicted melting temperature of hexagonal ice (Ih) at 1 bar is 272.2 K. This excellent value does not imply a deterioration of the rest of the properties. In fact, the predictions for both the densities and the coexistence curves are better than for TIP4P, which previously yielded the best estimations of the ice properties.

In this work we present an implementation for the calculation of the melting point of ice I(h) from direct coexistence of the solid-liquid interface. We use molecular dynamics simulations of boxes containing liquid water and ice in contact. The implementation is based on the analysis of the evolution of the total energy along NpT simulations at different temperatures. We report the calculation of the melting point of ice I(h) at 1 bar for seven water models: SPC/E, TIP4P, TIP4P-Ew, TIP4P/ice, TIP4P/2005, TIP5P, and TIP5P-E. The results for the melting temperature from the direct coexistence simulations of this work are in agreement (within the statistical uncertainty) with those obtained previously by us from free energy calculations. By taking into account the results of this work and those of our free energy calculations, recommended values of the melting point of ice I(h) at 1 bar for the above mentioned water models are provided.

The melting temperature of the six site potential of water is calculated using two different methods. The first one combines free energy calculations with Hamiltonian Gibbs-Duhem integration. The second method is based on the evolution (melting or freezing) of an explicit liquid-ice interface. Both methods yield very similar results, so we propose 289K as the melting temperature of the model.

Synopsis Owing to soil moisture differences, grain yields were increased by 85% and straw yields by 187% in heavily fertilized wheat. Maintenance of the available soil moisture percentage above 30 was necessary for maximum grain yields. The protein content of the whole grain was decreased by small applications of nitrogen and was increased by large applications. Protein content was lowest in the wettest treatment and highest in the driest treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

Resumo

No abstract