2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2007.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice: A fruitful source of information about liquid water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these confinement parameters, we have previously reported (from MD) the phase transition between the monolayer ice and corresponding liquid phase is firstorder, and a precise melting point (T m =402.5K) determined from a delicate crystal-melt phase coexistence simulation. 33 Note that T m for bulk ice modeled with SPC/E was reported as 215K, 29,34 nearly 200K smaller than that of the monolayer square ice in the current study, such big difference in T m between the 2D and 3D ice is not surprising. It has been known that the phase behavior (such as melting point) of the square-like confined ice is highly depending on confinement width as well as the lateral pressure.…”
contrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Under these confinement parameters, we have previously reported (from MD) the phase transition between the monolayer ice and corresponding liquid phase is firstorder, and a precise melting point (T m =402.5K) determined from a delicate crystal-melt phase coexistence simulation. 33 Note that T m for bulk ice modeled with SPC/E was reported as 215K, 29,34 nearly 200K smaller than that of the monolayer square ice in the current study, such big difference in T m between the 2D and 3D ice is not surprising. It has been known that the phase behavior (such as melting point) of the square-like confined ice is highly depending on confinement width as well as the lateral pressure.…”
contrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The fact that the point charge FFs predict ∆E sI coh to be too exothermic can be attributed to the enhanced dipole moment of the isolated water molecules in these types of potentials, 72,73 which has been shown to lead to too high vaporisation enthalpies of ice I h for the TIP4P-2005 and TIP4P-ICE potentials. 74 Indeed, Vega and co-workers 74 have found that it is impossible to simulataneously fit the melting temperature of ice I h and the enthalpy of vaporisation for such models. It is therefore probably expecting too much of the rigid point charge FFs to give reasonable results for both ∆E sI coh and ∆E sI→ice diss whilst also maintaining favourable densities and coexistence/melting temperatures for the hydrate and ice I h .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also seen that point-charge, all-atom force fields tend to overbind the hydrate lattice, although their agreement with DMC for the dissociation energy to ice and vapour, and for the structure for the bulk crystal, is good. From our knowledge of the literature 74 on the performance of simple point charge FFs for ice, it is unlikely that such FFs will be able to simultaneously describe both the cohesive energy of the hydrate crystal and the energetics of dissociation to other condensed phase water systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somewhat surprisingly the melting points were not established on a firm basis, and only the pioneering work of Haymet and co-workers 34,35,36,37 and Tanaka and co-workers 38 provided the first reasonable estimates of the melting point of ice Ih for these models. These early values of the melting temperature were about 10K above the current estimate of the ice melting point 39,40,41,42,43,44 . Fortunately, the melting points of TIP4P and SPC/E models have been established on a firm basis over the last three years, being equal to 230(3)K and 215(4)K respectively 36,37,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%