Sir: The accurate determination of serum protein-bound carbohydrate by the anthrone method (S) is hindered by the simultaneous release of tryptophan from the protein (5-7). Dissatisfaction with existing modifications (1, 2, 6, 7) prompted further study of the behavior of carbohydrate and tryptophan with anthrone.Confirming the work of Tuller and Keiding (7) for a given concentration of carbohydrate, all the absorption curves converged at 585 µ, despite varying concentrations of tryptophan. This observation offers an effective solution to the tryptophan interference problem.This communication establishes the validity of a modified anthrone method, which is compared with existing modifications.
Background-Few studies have compared vasoactive drugs with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the control of acute variceal haemorrhage. Octreotide is widely used for this purpose, but its value remains undetermined. Aims-To compare octreotide with endoscopic sclerotherapy for acute variceal haemorrhage. Patients-Consecutive patients with acute variceal haemorrhage.
Methods-Patients were randomised at endoscopy to receive either a 48 hour intravenous infusion of 50 µg/h octreotide (n=73), or emergency sclerotherapy (n=77).Results-Overall control of bleeding and mortality was not significantly diVerent between octreotide (85%, 62 patients) and sclerotherapy (82%, 63 patients) over the 48 hour trial period (relative risk of rebleeding 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.82), irrespective of Child's grading or active bleeding at endoscopy. One major complication was observed in the sclerotherapy group (aspiration) and two in the octreotide group (pulmonary oedema, severe paralytic ileus). During 60 days of follow up there was an overall trend towards an increased mortality in the octreotide group which was not statistically significant (relative risk of dying at 60 days 1.91, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.78, p=0.06). Conclusions-The results of this study indicate that intravenous octreotide is as eVective as injection sclerotherapy in the control of acute variceal bleeding, but further controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the safety of this treatment. (Gut 1997; 41: 526-533)
The traditional management of acute cholecystitis is initial conservative treatment with antibiotics followed by elective cholecystectomy. Although early cholecystectomy has often been advocated, there has been only one randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the two methods of treatment. This paper reports the preliminary results of such a trial in which 32 patients have been studied so far.
Of the 17 patients managed conservatively, there was a misdiagnosis in 2 (11.8 per cent). In the remaining 15 patients with acute cholecystitis 3 (20 per cent) required urgent operation because of failure of medical treatment. Elective cholecystectomy was not technically difficult.
Of the 15 patients treated by early cholecystectomy, there was a misdiagnosis in 1 (6.8 per cent). Surgery was technically difficult in 2 patients but cholecystectomy was possible in all. The former 2 patients required blood transfusion, but in the remainder the estimated blood loss was only slightly more than in the elective group.
There was no mortality in either group nor any complication directly attributable to the biliary surgery. The incidence of minor postoperative complications was only slightly greater in those treated by early operation. The length of postoperative stay was similar in both groups but those treated conservatively spent an average of 11 more days in hospital.
The preliminary results indicate that those treated by early cholecystectomy spend less time in hospital and avoid the complications of failed conservative treatment without the added risk of increased postoperative mortality and major complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.