Mitotic inheritance of the DNA methylome is a challenging task for the maintenance of cell identity. Whether DNA methylation pattern in different genomic contexts can all be faithfully maintained is an open question. A replication-coupled DNA methylation maintenance model was proposed decades ago, but some observations suggest that a replication-uncoupled maintenance mechanism exists. However, the capacity and the underlying molecular events of replication-uncoupled maintenance are unclear. By measuring maintenance kinetics at the single-molecule level and assessing mutant cells with perturbation of various mechanisms, we found that the kinetics of replication-coupled maintenance are governed by the UHRF1-Ligase 1 and PCNA-DNMT1 interactions, whereas nucleosome occupancy and the interaction between UHRF1 and methylated H3K9 specifically regulate replication-uncoupled maintenance. Surprisingly, replication-uncoupled maintenance is sufficiently robust to largely restore the methylome when replication-coupled maintenance is severely impaired. However, solo-WCGW sites and other CpG sites displaying aging-and cancer-associated hypomethylation exhibit low maintenance efficiency, suggesting that although quite robust, mitotic inheritance of methylation is imperfect and that this imperfection may contribute to selective hypomethylation during aging and tumorigenesis.

No abstract

The nucleotide messenger (p)ppGpp allows bacteria to adapt to fluctuating environments by reprogramming the transcriptome. Despite its well-recognized role in gene regulation, (p)ppGpp is only known to directly affect transcription in Proteobacteria by binding to the RNA polymerase. Here, we reveal a different mechanism of gene regulation by (p)ppGpp in Firmicutes: (p)ppGpp directly binds to the transcription factor PurR to downregulate purine biosynthesis gene expression upon amino acid starvation. We first identified PurR as a receptor of (p)ppGpp in Bacillus anthracis. A co-structure with Bacillus subtilis PurR reveals that (p)ppGpp binds to a PurR pocket reminiscent of the active site of phosphoribosyltransferase enzymes that has been repurposed to serve a purely regulatory role, where the effectors (p)ppGpp and PRPP compete to allosterically control transcription. PRPP inhibits PurR DNA binding to induce transcription of purine synthesis genes, whereas (p)ppGpp antagonizes PRPP to enhance PurR DNA binding and repress transcription. A (p)ppGpp-refractory purR mutant in B. subtilis fails to downregulate purine synthesis genes upon amino acid starvation. Our work establishes the precedent of (p)ppGpp as an effector of a classical transcription repressor and reveals the key function of (p)ppGpp in regulating nucleotide synthesis through gene regulation, from soil bacteria to pathogens.

The synthesis of RNA-DNA primer by primosome requires coordination between primase and DNA polymerase α subunits, which is accompanied by unknown architectural rearrangements of multiple domains. Using cryogenic-electron microscope, we solved a 3.6 Å human primosome structure caught at an early stage of RNA primer elongation with deoxynucleotides. The structure con rms a long-standing role of primase large subunit and reveals new insights into how primosome is limited to synthesizing short RNA-DNA primers.

Telomere replication and regulation protect mammalian chromosome ends and promote genome stability. An essential step in telomere maintenance is the C-strand fill-in process, which is the de novo synthesis of the complementary strand of the telomere overhang. This step is catalyzed by polymerase-alpha/primase complex (pol-α/primase) and coordinated by an accessory factor, CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST). Using cryogenic-electron microscopy single-particle analysis, we report the structure of the human telomere C-strand fill-in preinitiation complex (PIC) at 3.9 Å resolution. The structure reveals a CST and a pol-α/primase co-bound to a single telomere overhang, poised for de novo RNA primer synthesis. Upon PIC assembly, the pol-α/primase undergoes large conformation change from its apo-state; CST partitions the DNA and RNA catalytic centers of pol-α/primase into two separate domains and positions the 3′ end of an extended telomere single-stranded DNA template towards the RNA catalytic center (PRIM1 or p49). The telomeric single-stranded DNA template is further positioned by the POLA1 (or p180) catalytically dead exonuclease domain. Together with CST, the exonuclease domain forms a tight-fit molecular tunnel for template direction. Given the structural homology of CST to Replication Protein A (RPA), our structure provides the structural basis for a new model of how pol-α/primase lagging-strand DNA synthesis is coordinated by single-stranded DNA-binding accessory factors.