Background: Extensive mapping efforts are currently underway for the establishment of comparative genomics between the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana and various Brassica species. Most of these studies have deployed RFLP markers, the use of which is a laborious and time-consuming process. We therefore tested the efficacy of PCR-based Intron Polymorphism (IP) markers to analyze genome-wide synteny between the oilseed crop, Brassica juncea (AABB genome) and A. thaliana and analyzed the arrangement of 24 (previously described) genomic block segments in the A, B and C Brassica genomes to study the evolutionary events contributing to karyotype variations in the three diploid Brassica genomes.
We have developed a novel four-element based gene tagging system in Arabidopsis to minimize the number of starter lines required to generate genome-wide insertions for saturation mutagenesis. In this system, the non-autonomous cassette, Ds(dSpm), comprises of both Ds and dSpm elements cloned one within the other along with appropriate selection markers to allow efficient monitoring of excision and re-integration of the transposons. Trans-activation of the outer borders (Ds) and selection against the negative selection marker (iaaH) linked to the cassette ensures unlinked spread of the Ds(dSpm) cassette from the initial site of integration of the T-DNA. This creates several launch pads within the genome from where the internal element (dSpm) can be subsequently mobilized to generate secondary insertions. In this study, starting from a single T-DNA integration we could spread the Ds(dSpm) cassette to 11 different locations over all the five chromosomes of Arabidopsis. The frequency of unlinked Ds transpositions in the F2 generation varied between 0.05 and 3.35%. Three of these lines were then deployed to trans-activate the internal dSpm element which led to the selection of 29 dSpm insertions. The study conclusively shows the feasibility of deploying Ds and the dSpm elements in a single construct for insertional mutagenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.