Early diagnosis of t(15;17) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is essential because of the associated disseminated intravascular coagulation and the unique response of the disease to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) therapy. Early diagnosis depends primarily on morphological recognition. The French-American-British (FAB) classification, however, does not describe all morphological variations that occur in APL. In 25 cases with evidence of APL confirmed by cytogenetic and/or molecular analysis, we found a heterogeneous morphological group. The most common form of APL was heterogeneous and consisted of various combinations of cells in which hypergranular cells and some cells with multiple Auer rods were obvious. In some cases, one cell predominated. This led to the description of five subcategories. These included the classical FAB M3 with hyper-granular cells and multiple Auer rods; the FAB variant with hypogranular bilobed cells; the basophilic cell type of McKenna et al. [Br. J. Haematol 50:201, 1982]; and two additional subtypes, one consisting of differentiated promyelocytes and a few blast cells (M2-like), and the other consisting largely of blast cells and a few early promyelocytes (M1-like). Immunophenotyping revealed a pattern of CD33 and/or CD13 positivity, and CD14 and HLA-DR negativity in 96% of cases. CD2 was positive in the FAB variant and in the subtype with basophilic cells, but negative with other subtypes. Three out of five cases with basophilic cell predominance [McKenna et al.: Br J Haematol 50:201, 1982], and one out of two M2-like cases, responded to ATRA therapy. Awareness of the hetero-geneity and the atypical morphologic subtypes found in t(15;17) APL will contribute to improved recognition and early institution of ATRA therapy. Am.

No abstract

Acute mixed myeloid-lymphoid leukemia is uncommon. We report four cases in which myeloid and lymphoid cell markers were observed simultaneously or sequentially when 94 patients with acute leukemia were phenotyped according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification system, with cytochemical stains, and with immunologically defined differentiation markers (identified by monoclonal antibodies and antiterminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase [TdT]). In one case, conversion from acute lymphoblastic leukemia to acute myeloid leukemia was noted (FAB L1, TdT+ to FAB M4, Auer rods, TdT-). In another patient, two distinct populations of myeloid and lymphoid blast cells were observed simultaneously (TdT-, LeuM1+/TdT+, LeuM1-). In two additional patients, acute leukemia was characterized by the expression of both lymphoid and myeloid markers on the same cell (TdT+/Leu M1+, B4+/Leu M1+ and greater than or equal to 70% TdT+, T11+, My9+). The Philadelphia (Ph1) chromosome was negative in all cases, though other chromosomal abnormalities were noted in three out of four cases. Malignant transformation of a pluripotential stem cell for both lymphoid and myeloid lineages, with or without the Ph1 chromosome marker, could explain the coexistence of distinct populations of lymphoblasts and myeloblasts in acute leukemia. Acute leukemia with a biphenotypic profile may reflect genome depression accompanying neoplasia.

Autologous PBPCs are a potential source of parvovirus infection, which may cause significant disease after autologous BMT.

A panel of commercially available monoclonal antibodies and five heteroantisera were used to distinguish and subtype 138 cases of acute leukemia (AL). The immunophenotype was compared with the French- American-British (FAB) classification obtained on the cases. The immunophenotype discriminated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and recognized cases not distinguished by cytochemistry (22% of cases), mixed lineage phenotypes (13% of cases), and cases with separate populations of lymphoblasts and myeloblasts (one case). Using the immunologic panel and derived criteria to subtype AML, correspondence of the immunophenotype to the FAB subtypes M1, M2, M4, and M5 was possible in greater than 80% of cases. A combined classification of the immunophenotype and FAB morphology/cytochemistry was devised for AML subtyping. It is recommended that immunophenotyping should be done at least in all cases with negative orinconclusive cytochemistry. At present, we suggest that until a “gold standard” for identifying leukemic subtypes is developed, the best method for typing acute leukemia is by using a combination of morphology, cytochemistry and immunophenotyping.