Although it is known that the human genome contains hundreds of microRNA (miRNA) genes and that each miRNA can regulate a large number of mRNA targets, the overall effect of miRNAs on mRNA tissue profiles has not been systematically elucidated. Here, we show that predicted human mRNA targets of several highly tissue-specific miRNAs are typically expressed in the same tissue as the miRNA but at significantly lower levels than in tissues where the miRNA is not present. Conversely, highly expressed genes are often enriched in mRNAs that do not have the recognition motifs for the miRNAs expressed in these tissues. Together, our data support the hypothesis that miRNA expression broadly contributes to tissue specificity of mRNA expression in many human tissues. Based on these insights, we apply a computational tool to directly correlate 3 UTR motifs with changes in mRNA levels upon miRNA overexpression or knockdown. We show that this tool can identify functionally important 3 UTR motifs without cross-species comparison.gene expression ͉ microarray ͉ posttranscriptional control

At least 10% of C. elegans genes are predicted miRNA targets, and a number of nematode miRNAs seem to regulate biological processes by targeting functionally related genes. We have also developed and successfully utilized an in vivo system for testing miRNA target predictions in likely endogenous expression domains. The thousands of genome-wide miRNA target predictions for nematodes, humans, and flies are available from the PicTar website and are linked to an accessible graphical network-browsing tool allowing exploration of miRNA target predictions in the context of various functional genomic data resources.

Model organisms are widely used in research as accessible and convenient systems to study a particular area or question in biology. Traditionally only a handful of organisms have been widely studied, but modern research tools are enabling researchers to extend the set of model organisms to include less-studied and more unusual systems. This Forum highlights a range of 'non-model model organisms' as emerging systems for tackling questions across the whole spectrum of biology (and beyond), the opportunities and challenges, and the outlook for the future.

How complex networks of activators and repressors lead to exquisitely specific cell type determination during development is poorly understood. In the Drosophila eye, expression patterns of Rhodopsins define at least eight functionally distinct though related subtypes of photoreceptors. Here, we describe a role for the transcription factor gene defective proventriculus (dve) as a critical node in the network regulating Rhodopsin expression. dve is a shared component of two opposing, interlocked feedforward loops (FFLs). Orthodenticle and Dve interact in an incoherent FFL to repress Rhodopsin expression throughout the eye. In the R7 and R8 photoreceptors, a coherent FFL relieves repression by Dve while activating Rhodopsin expression. Therefore, this network uses repression to restrict, and combinatorial activation to induce cell type-specific expression. Further, Dve levels are finely tuned to yield cell type- and region-specific repression or activation outcomes. This interlocked FFL motif may be a general mechanism to control terminal cell fate specification.

Summary The giant, single-celled organism Stentor coeruleus has a long history as a model system for studying pattern formation and regeneration in single cells. Stentor (Figure 1A,B [1,2]) is a heterotrichous ciliate distantly related to familiar ciliate models such as Tetrahymena or Paramecium. The primary distinguishing feature of Stentor is its incredible size: a single cell is 1 millimeter long. Early developmental biologists, including T.H. Morgan[3], were attracted to the system because of its regenerative abilities -- if large portions of a cell are surgically removed, the remnant reorganizes into a normal-looking but smaller cell with correct proportionality [2,3]. These biologists were also drawn to Stentor because it exhibits a rich repertoire of behaviors, including light avoidance, mechanosensitive contraction, food selection, and even the ability to habituate to touch, a simple form of learning usually seen in higher organisms [4]. While early microsurgical approaches demonstrated a startling array of regenerative and morphogenetic processes in this single-celled organism, Stentor was never developed as a molecular model system. We report the sequencing of the Stentor coeruleus macronuclear genome and reveal key features of the genome: First, we find that Stentor uses the standard genetic code, suggesting that ciliate specific genetic codes arose after Stentor branched from other ciliates. We also discover that ploidy correlates with Stentor’s cell size. Finally, in the Stentor genome, we discover the smallest spliceosomal introns reported for any species. The sequenced genome opens the door to molecular analysis of single-cell regeneration in Stentor.

Wound repair is a key feature distinguishing living from nonliving matter. Single cells are increasingly recognized to be capable of healing wounds. The lack of reproducible, high-throughput wounding methods has hindered single-cell wound repair studies. This work describes a microfluidic guillotine for bisecting single Stentor coeruleus cells in a continuous-flow manner. Stentor is used as a model due to its robust repair capacity and the ability to perform gene knockdown in a high-throughput manner. Local cutting dynamics reveals two regimes under which cells are bisected, one at low viscous stress where cells are cut with small membrane ruptures and high viability and one at high viscous stress where cells are cut with extended membrane ruptures and decreased viability. A cutting throughput up to 64 cells per minute-more than 200 times faster than current methods-is achieved. The method allows the generation of more than 100 cells in a synchronized stage of their repair process. This capacity, combined with high-throughput gene knockdown in Stentor, enables time-course mechanistic studies impossible with current wounding methods.

The giant ciliate Stentor coeruleus is a classical model system for studying regeneration and morphogenesis at the level of a single cell. Stentor are polarized cells with a complex subcellular architecture. The anterior of the cell is marked by a complex polarized array of cilia, known as the oral apparatus. This feeding organelle can be induced to shed and regenerate in a series of reproducible morphological steps, previously shown to require transcription. We used RNAseq to assay the dynamic changes in Stentor's transcriptome during regeneration with high temporal resolution, allowing us to identify five distinct waves of gene expression. We show that the oral apparatus is a model for organelle regeneration, as well many conserved genes involved in centriole assembly and ciliogenesis are induced. Additionally, we find genes involved in signaling, cell cycle regulation, transcription, and RNA binding to be expressed at distinct stages of organelle regeneration, suggesting that the morphological steps of regeneration are driven by a complex regulatory system. Materials and Methods Inducing Regeneration and Staging StentorCells were obtained from Carolina Biological Supply and cultured as previously described [20]. Briefly, cells were maintained in Pasteurized Spring Water (Carolina Biological Supply) and fed with Chlamydomonas and wheat seeds. Cells were collected from the same culture for each RNAseq experimental replicate. To induce regeneration, cells were shocked with a 15% sucrose solution for 2 minutes [11], and then washed in Carolina Spring Water thoroughly. Samples of ~20 cells were collected before shock, then at 30 minutes post shock, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours and 8 hours. At each time point, a sample of cells was lysed into RNA-stabilizing buffers specified by the extraction kit, and then stored on ice until the end of the experiment when the RNA purification was performed in parallel on all samples (see below). 4 replicates were analyzed for each time-point. Total RNA extractionRNA was extracted at each time point using the Nucleospin RNA XS kit from Clontech (cat. num. 740902.250). RNA quality was assessed using a NanoDrop and then Bioanalyzer was used to quantify RNA amount. ERCC spike ins (ThermoFisher cat. num. 4456739) were added to each sample in a dilution ranging from 1:1000 to 1:10000 depending on the initial amount of RNA extracted. RNA-Seq library preparation and sequencingRNA-seq libraries were prepared with Ovation RNA-seq system v2 kit (NuGEN). In this method, the total RNA (50 ng or less) is reverse transcribed to synthesize the first-strand cDNA using a combination of random hexamers and a poly-T chimeric primer. The RNA template is then partially degraded by heating and the second strand cDNA is synthesized using DNA polymerase. The double-stranded DNA is then amplified using single primer isothermal amplification (SPIA). SPIA is a linear cDNA amplification process in which RNase H degrades RNA in DNA/RNA heteroduplex at the 5′-end of the double-st...

No abstract